features you disabled in Windows 7 and why?


Recommended Posts

I've started a similar thread for Vista, so here goes...

What major features/service did you turn off in W7?

User Account Control -> Useless for me. I run 7 as a Administrator, and I'm virus free since the release of Vista.

System Protection (Restore) -> Until I get a bigger harddrive, I'll keep it off.

Windows Search (Indexing services) -> Search is already fast because all my files are organized in specific folders.

Windows Defender -> NOD32 can detect malware.

I've kept Superfetch this time, because it is much more optimized than its Vista counterpart.

Window shadows, because I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. Thank you whoever at Microsoft made them optional.

I also disable system restore. I never, ever use it and it just wastes time and space.

with hard drives being so cheap these days i don't really care about space....

but the features i turned off were all the games, auto updates. help and support, defender, the 50 languages, error reporting.

turned UAC down since I still would like to know when a program is making changes on its' own. it doesn't bother me at all now.

win7stuff.png

I have apps that use .NET, and XPS is required by Office 2007 to operate properly. Remote Differential Compression sounds like it could be useful, but I haven't really looked into it.

System Restore is disabled as I never use the feature.

Only thing I've disabled were the Tablet PC components. If 7 can detect whether a machine can support Pen or Touch, then why doesn't it disable/enable the components based on that?

I really see no point in disabling anything else. I use features of System Restore like Previous Versions, but even if that wasn't there, I'd still have it enabled. Never know when you'll need that one restore point.

XPS Services. No idea what are those for, never used them, and the additional "printers" just kept bugging me.

If someone wants to tell me that it's not the best idea, then please do it now :p

Kept system restore on, I think I've got enough space for that. I'm also fine with Windows Defender + MSE.

Turned off UAC, Turned off Driver Signing (x64), Turned Off the Super Bar and went back to a vista-style taskbar + quicklaunch.

Most of these things to me are pretty stupid for Microsoft to include. First of all UAC is just frustrating and doesn't appear to be curbing security issues under Windows at all. Forced driver signing under x64 is frustrating and in my opinion a pathetic attempt by Microsoft to lock the operating system down from open source and freeware developers who cannot raise the money to pay for a signed driver, and the superbar is not to my liking personally I prefer the old taskbar. The most annoying thing about it is when you launch an application all the icons move around so if you usually keep an icon in a specific place you have to search all around the bottom of your screen for it. The quicklaunch bar in older versions of windows solved this problem but Microsoft removed it unless you go through and specifically activate it in a hidden shortcut group.

Anyway just minor issues overall windows 7 is great.

WTF turn anything off when windows 7 is what it is and works the way it is just fine. sure everyone has there opinion on what works fine and all but why not run the OS as default setting why bother messing with it because all your doing is trying to turn it in to something you had in the past turning things off or well disabling services related to features.

If you want windows 7 superbar to act more like vistas then why did you bother moving to 7 cause if you was not interested in any of its feature why move. i myself run windows 7 with everything enabled and things work perfect for me on my system and i got fast enough system with plenty of space so turning off stuff is a no Need i love all of windows 7 features and run them as they are intended to run as windows 7 was made to run. the windows 7 Devs put alot of time in effort making a product we would love to use .

sorry for the little rant but hey.

UAC - Im not an idiot and with a bit of common sense you dont even need UAC, i managed fine from windows 3.11 onwards.

Superbar - I hate it with a passion, i re-enabled quick launch and "classic" vista style start bar.

System Restore - I dont find it particularly useful, i use Macrium Reflect for drive imaging and backup anyway.

Auto Arrange Windows when dragged to the edge of screen - dont need it, i am OCD about how my desktop is set out, Firefox smack bang in the middle equal distance away from the left and right side of screen, irc window at the bottom of the screen, games icons in the gap on the right side of firefox and recycle bin on the left gap and with this feature turned on every time i try to drag a window it automatically resizes it.

If you want windows 7 superbar to act more like vistas then why did you bother moving to 7 cause if you was not interested in any of its feature why move. i myself run windows 7 with everything enabled and things work perfect for me on my system and i got fast enough system with plenty of space so turning off stuff is a no Need i love all of windows 7 features and run them as they are intended to run as windows 7 was made to run. the windows 7 Devs put alot of time in effort making a product we would love to use .

Because there is more to 7 than just a pretty GUI update, i upgraded from Vista because of all the behind the scenes work and its faster than Vista. Besides, i paid for it i should be able to do wtf i want to it including make it look like windows 3.11 if i wanted to i dont need your permission.

None. I don't see the point in turning features off or 'optimising' the operating system - with 4 GB of RAM in my machine 10 or 20 MB being used by a service don't bother me.

We're not in 2001 anymore, trying to make XP run well on machines with 256 MB of RAM.

XPS is Microsoft's answer to PDF.

It's also a new print format.

WTF turn anything off when windows 7 is what it is and works the way it is just fine. sure everyone has there opinion on what works fine and all but why not run the OS as default setting

If there are small things I can EASILY do to make it more comfortable for me, then why on earth shouldn't I? You argument makes absolutely no sense. I also turn labels back on for the taskbar, because I like it better that way. Why should I accept all the defaults?

None. I don't see the point in turning features off or 'optimising' the operating system - with 4 GB of RAM in my machine 10 or 20 MB being used by a service don't bother me.

We're not in 2001 anymore, trying to make XP run well on machines with 256 MB of RAM.

Maybe not, but what's the point in me keeping, say, system restore on when I've never had a need for it, and it takes time to create restore points every time something is done? It's a waste to me. Disabling it is just clicking a radio button. Why shouldn't I?

UAC - Im not an idiot and with a bit of common sense you dont even need UAC, i managed fine from windows 3.11 onwards.

Superbar - I hate it with a passion, i re-enabled quick launch and "classic" vista style start bar.

System Restore - I dont find it particularly useful, i use Macrium Reflect for drive imaging and backup anyway.

Auto Arrange Windows when dragged to the edge of screen - dont need it, i am OCD about how my desktop is set out, Firefox smack bang in the middle equal distance away from the left and right side of screen, irc window at the bottom of the screen, games icons in the gap on the right side of firefox and recycle bin on the left gap and with this feature turned on every time i try to drag a window it automatically resizes it.

Because there is more to 7 than just a pretty GUI update, i upgraded from Vista because of all the behind the scenes work and its faster than Vista. Besides, i paid for it i should be able to do wtf i want to it including make it look like windows 3.11 if i wanted to i dont need your permission.

Firstly the superbar is a complete overhaul and not just a GUI update and adds many little features to it useful features so yes it is faster but making it more like vista makes it less productive because part of windows 7 being faster besides the performance improvement under the hood is the usability aspect and how things can get done .

( Example) Aero snap is a huge feature and ya already know what it does and how it works . now try doing that in windows vista or below then you have to mauualy take the time just to resize the window to way Aero snap does it automatically.

Firstly the superbar is a complete overhaul and not just a GUI update and adds many little features to it useful features so yes it is faster but making it more like vista makes it less productive because part of windows 7 being faster besides the performance improvement under the hood is the usability aspect and how things can get done .

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

well ya can make the icons bigger , also hovering over an icon is fast and simple and the previews come up very damn split second fast for me so i dont know what your issue is on that also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon . also Less Clutter on the superbar also enabling the old quick launch just puts more clutter on the superbar specially if you have many icons in the quick launch .

UAC, system restore and backup. Haven't really touched the add/remove features; features such as touch input and many others were already deselected which was good. I enjoy using the superbar and haven't gone back to the old way. I think it takes a bit of time getting used to.

well ya can make the icons bigger

No, you can't. You can only make them smaller. The point was that for many people they really are very small and hard to identify. It's nice that you don't have a problem with it, but don't generalize.

also hovering over an icon is fast and simple and the previews come up very damn split second fast for me so i dont know what your issue is on that

By default it takes almost a second for the previews to appear.

also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon .

No, the previews are tiny to the point where it's pretty much impossible for most people to figure out what the thumbnail is showing. This is why they added a window title to the previews, as well as the full-size previews that appear if you hover for a while over the thumbnail.

The fact that you're trying to tell me I can do all this faster than just finding the button (with a label!) that corresponds to the window I want to show and just clicking it is absurd.

also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon . also Less Clutter on the superbar also enabling the old quick launch just puts more clutter on the superbar specially if you have many icons in the quick launch .

I personally don't use the quick launch, but I can see why some people would prefer to have their launchers and window buttons (which is what the taskbar is actually showing.. it shows windows, that's why you need hacks to add arbitrary items to the superbar) separate. If you have labels on the launcher icons in the superbar can look out of place and move around as you launch applications. Personally I don't mind this, but I can it being an issue for some.

Also, can you please try to use punctuation?

Secure Desktop

While I like UAC, I really dislike the background dimming when a prompt appears.

It's a pretty major part of AAM. Without it, programs can not only trick you and ride elevations (which they can even with the SD), but they can also completely change the appearance of the prompt to say whatever they want. They could even make it look like a random non-UAC message.

I only have the indexing service disabled. I rarely use the search feature and when I'm forced to, I can wait an extra 5 minutes for whatever I'm searching.

You should go down and disable Windows Search then, because the "Indexing Service" is not what powers the search in Vista and 7, it's a legacy component that is disabled by default.

UAC - Still too much of an annoyance

Driver signing in 64bit - Pretty much required to use the xbcd drivers for my 360 pad isntead of ms's basic, crappy, and [last i checked] un-configurable ones.

Automatic updates - Don't like things downloading and installing randomly.

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

You do know you can click with the windows 7 style taskbar too, right? You're not forced to hover and wait for it. "Finding the icon" also isn't rocket science if you've ever seen the icon of the app you're looking for even once before.

You do know you can click with the windows 7 style taskbar too, right? You're not forced to hover and wait for it. "Finding the icon" also isn't rocket science if you've ever seen the icon of the app you're looking for even once before.

I do, but it's still a far more consuming process than simply going straight for the button and blam, having my window appear. People who insist I use something that is more complicated and slower for me simply because it is the default are idiots.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!