features you disabled in Windows 7 and why?


Recommended Posts

I've started a similar thread for Vista, so here goes...

What major features/service did you turn off in W7?

User Account Control -> Useless for me. I run 7 as a Administrator, and I'm virus free since the release of Vista.

System Protection (Restore) -> Until I get a bigger harddrive, I'll keep it off.

Windows Search (Indexing services) -> Search is already fast because all my files are organized in specific folders.

Windows Defender -> NOD32 can detect malware.

I've kept Superfetch this time, because it is much more optimized than its Vista counterpart.

Window shadows, because I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. I hate them so much. Thank you whoever at Microsoft made them optional.

I also disable system restore. I never, ever use it and it just wastes time and space.

with hard drives being so cheap these days i don't really care about space....

but the features i turned off were all the games, auto updates. help and support, defender, the 50 languages, error reporting.

turned UAC down since I still would like to know when a program is making changes on its' own. it doesn't bother me at all now.

win7stuff.png

I have apps that use .NET, and XPS is required by Office 2007 to operate properly. Remote Differential Compression sounds like it could be useful, but I haven't really looked into it.

System Restore is disabled as I never use the feature.

Only thing I've disabled were the Tablet PC components. If 7 can detect whether a machine can support Pen or Touch, then why doesn't it disable/enable the components based on that?

I really see no point in disabling anything else. I use features of System Restore like Previous Versions, but even if that wasn't there, I'd still have it enabled. Never know when you'll need that one restore point.

XPS Services. No idea what are those for, never used them, and the additional "printers" just kept bugging me.

If someone wants to tell me that it's not the best idea, then please do it now :p

Kept system restore on, I think I've got enough space for that. I'm also fine with Windows Defender + MSE.

Turned off UAC, Turned off Driver Signing (x64), Turned Off the Super Bar and went back to a vista-style taskbar + quicklaunch.

Most of these things to me are pretty stupid for Microsoft to include. First of all UAC is just frustrating and doesn't appear to be curbing security issues under Windows at all. Forced driver signing under x64 is frustrating and in my opinion a pathetic attempt by Microsoft to lock the operating system down from open source and freeware developers who cannot raise the money to pay for a signed driver, and the superbar is not to my liking personally I prefer the old taskbar. The most annoying thing about it is when you launch an application all the icons move around so if you usually keep an icon in a specific place you have to search all around the bottom of your screen for it. The quicklaunch bar in older versions of windows solved this problem but Microsoft removed it unless you go through and specifically activate it in a hidden shortcut group.

Anyway just minor issues overall windows 7 is great.

WTF turn anything off when windows 7 is what it is and works the way it is just fine. sure everyone has there opinion on what works fine and all but why not run the OS as default setting why bother messing with it because all your doing is trying to turn it in to something you had in the past turning things off or well disabling services related to features.

If you want windows 7 superbar to act more like vistas then why did you bother moving to 7 cause if you was not interested in any of its feature why move. i myself run windows 7 with everything enabled and things work perfect for me on my system and i got fast enough system with plenty of space so turning off stuff is a no Need i love all of windows 7 features and run them as they are intended to run as windows 7 was made to run. the windows 7 Devs put alot of time in effort making a product we would love to use .

sorry for the little rant but hey.

UAC - Im not an idiot and with a bit of common sense you dont even need UAC, i managed fine from windows 3.11 onwards.

Superbar - I hate it with a passion, i re-enabled quick launch and "classic" vista style start bar.

System Restore - I dont find it particularly useful, i use Macrium Reflect for drive imaging and backup anyway.

Auto Arrange Windows when dragged to the edge of screen - dont need it, i am OCD about how my desktop is set out, Firefox smack bang in the middle equal distance away from the left and right side of screen, irc window at the bottom of the screen, games icons in the gap on the right side of firefox and recycle bin on the left gap and with this feature turned on every time i try to drag a window it automatically resizes it.

If you want windows 7 superbar to act more like vistas then why did you bother moving to 7 cause if you was not interested in any of its feature why move. i myself run windows 7 with everything enabled and things work perfect for me on my system and i got fast enough system with plenty of space so turning off stuff is a no Need i love all of windows 7 features and run them as they are intended to run as windows 7 was made to run. the windows 7 Devs put alot of time in effort making a product we would love to use .

Because there is more to 7 than just a pretty GUI update, i upgraded from Vista because of all the behind the scenes work and its faster than Vista. Besides, i paid for it i should be able to do wtf i want to it including make it look like windows 3.11 if i wanted to i dont need your permission.

None. I don't see the point in turning features off or 'optimising' the operating system - with 4 GB of RAM in my machine 10 or 20 MB being used by a service don't bother me.

We're not in 2001 anymore, trying to make XP run well on machines with 256 MB of RAM.

XPS is Microsoft's answer to PDF.

It's also a new print format.

WTF turn anything off when windows 7 is what it is and works the way it is just fine. sure everyone has there opinion on what works fine and all but why not run the OS as default setting

If there are small things I can EASILY do to make it more comfortable for me, then why on earth shouldn't I? You argument makes absolutely no sense. I also turn labels back on for the taskbar, because I like it better that way. Why should I accept all the defaults?

None. I don't see the point in turning features off or 'optimising' the operating system - with 4 GB of RAM in my machine 10 or 20 MB being used by a service don't bother me.

We're not in 2001 anymore, trying to make XP run well on machines with 256 MB of RAM.

Maybe not, but what's the point in me keeping, say, system restore on when I've never had a need for it, and it takes time to create restore points every time something is done? It's a waste to me. Disabling it is just clicking a radio button. Why shouldn't I?

UAC - Im not an idiot and with a bit of common sense you dont even need UAC, i managed fine from windows 3.11 onwards.

Superbar - I hate it with a passion, i re-enabled quick launch and "classic" vista style start bar.

System Restore - I dont find it particularly useful, i use Macrium Reflect for drive imaging and backup anyway.

Auto Arrange Windows when dragged to the edge of screen - dont need it, i am OCD about how my desktop is set out, Firefox smack bang in the middle equal distance away from the left and right side of screen, irc window at the bottom of the screen, games icons in the gap on the right side of firefox and recycle bin on the left gap and with this feature turned on every time i try to drag a window it automatically resizes it.

Because there is more to 7 than just a pretty GUI update, i upgraded from Vista because of all the behind the scenes work and its faster than Vista. Besides, i paid for it i should be able to do wtf i want to it including make it look like windows 3.11 if i wanted to i dont need your permission.

Firstly the superbar is a complete overhaul and not just a GUI update and adds many little features to it useful features so yes it is faster but making it more like vista makes it less productive because part of windows 7 being faster besides the performance improvement under the hood is the usability aspect and how things can get done .

( Example) Aero snap is a huge feature and ya already know what it does and how it works . now try doing that in windows vista or below then you have to mauualy take the time just to resize the window to way Aero snap does it automatically.

Firstly the superbar is a complete overhaul and not just a GUI update and adds many little features to it useful features so yes it is faster but making it more like vista makes it less productive because part of windows 7 being faster besides the performance improvement under the hood is the usability aspect and how things can get done .

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

well ya can make the icons bigger , also hovering over an icon is fast and simple and the previews come up very damn split second fast for me so i dont know what your issue is on that also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon . also Less Clutter on the superbar also enabling the old quick launch just puts more clutter on the superbar specially if you have many icons in the quick launch .

UAC, system restore and backup. Haven't really touched the add/remove features; features such as touch input and many others were already deselected which was good. I enjoy using the superbar and haven't gone back to the old way. I think it takes a bit of time getting used to.

well ya can make the icons bigger

No, you can't. You can only make them smaller. The point was that for many people they really are very small and hard to identify. It's nice that you don't have a problem with it, but don't generalize.

also hovering over an icon is fast and simple and the previews come up very damn split second fast for me so i dont know what your issue is on that

By default it takes almost a second for the previews to appear.

also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon .

No, the previews are tiny to the point where it's pretty much impossible for most people to figure out what the thumbnail is showing. This is why they added a window title to the previews, as well as the full-size previews that appear if you hover for a while over the thumbnail.

The fact that you're trying to tell me I can do all this faster than just finding the button (with a label!) that corresponds to the window I want to show and just clicking it is absurd.

also and it is simple to find the preview ya need as it is huge and big and plain text on the icon . also Less Clutter on the superbar also enabling the old quick launch just puts more clutter on the superbar specially if you have many icons in the quick launch .

I personally don't use the quick launch, but I can see why some people would prefer to have their launchers and window buttons (which is what the taskbar is actually showing.. it shows windows, that's why you need hacks to add arbitrary items to the superbar) separate. If you have labels on the launcher icons in the superbar can look out of place and move around as you launch applications. Personally I don't mind this, but I can it being an issue for some.

Also, can you please try to use punctuation?

Secure Desktop

While I like UAC, I really dislike the background dimming when a prompt appears.

It's a pretty major part of AAM. Without it, programs can not only trick you and ride elevations (which they can even with the SD), but they can also completely change the appearance of the prompt to say whatever they want. They could even make it look like a random non-UAC message.

I only have the indexing service disabled. I rarely use the search feature and when I'm forced to, I can wait an extra 5 minutes for whatever I'm searching.

You should go down and disable Windows Search then, because the "Indexing Service" is not what powers the search in Vista and 7, it's a legacy component that is disabled by default.

UAC - Still too much of an annoyance

Driver signing in 64bit - Pretty much required to use the xbcd drivers for my 360 pad isntead of ms's basic, crappy, and [last i checked] un-configurable ones.

Automatic updates - Don't like things downloading and installing randomly.

That isn't automatically true. Being forced to switch to identifying small icons rather than the text buttons you've used for 15 years won't necessarily make anything faster. In fact, it can do the opposite.

I find it harder and more time-consuming to do everything with it on. First I have to find the icon (which on Windows are often of extremely poor quality, so it looks like poop as well), then I have to hover over it, wait for the thumbnails to appear, identify the window I want from the thumbnails, and then click that to get my window. I'd rather just click directly on the taskbar tab that corresponds to the window I want.

You do know you can click with the windows 7 style taskbar too, right? You're not forced to hover and wait for it. "Finding the icon" also isn't rocket science if you've ever seen the icon of the app you're looking for even once before.

You do know you can click with the windows 7 style taskbar too, right? You're not forced to hover and wait for it. "Finding the icon" also isn't rocket science if you've ever seen the icon of the app you're looking for even once before.

I do, but it's still a far more consuming process than simply going straight for the button and blam, having my window appear. People who insist I use something that is more complicated and slower for me simply because it is the default are idiots.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!