features you disabled in Windows 7 and why?


Recommended Posts

Not crippled at all. Works faster without Microsoft's spyware applications.

Again it's only spyware if it does it without your knowledge and consent.

and since every one of those asks you to submit data to MS or even requires you to start the app manually... well no.

and none of those have any impact on performance anyway since they don't actively run, and some only run when there's an exception being caught and reported to windows. such as error reporting, wich is a useful tool in getting solutions back from MS about what the problem actually is. and for most problems nowadays they have a solution ready.

Can't think of much I've turned off, now what I've had to turn on on the other hand...

Disabling Tablet tools is absolutely silly, you lose Snip! FAIL

Disabling UAC is unnecessary at this point and has a greater chance of causing new issues (New crappy apps like QB code for it being ON, the trend will continue)

Disable Shadow Copies, cause having a few versions of your files isn't worth a pitiful amount of drive space

Actually, in Windows 7 the Snipping Tool is not a feature with the Tablet PC tools, so you can disable it without losing the Snipping Tool.

Not crippled at all. Works faster without Microsoft's spyware applications.

You keep wearing that tin foil hat of yours!!!!

Removed all high contrast/basic themes, also removed all other themes except for Windows 7 theme (I think without that one it is a no go). Also removed the web folder (it holds wallpapers to accompany the themes).

NTFS compressed the backup folder in winsxs - saved about 100MB of space. Also removed elements in winsxs dealing with defender, mail, and homegroup.

All works for now.

BS.

Yeah, except when you realize something won't work, you'll come crying to this forum for help, you won't tell anyone what you disabled, and most likely, similar to the other sheep who "tweak" their system, you'll blame Microsoft for everything and claim it's their fault.

Calling it now.

Yeah, except when you realize something won't work, you'll come crying to this forum for help, you won't tell anyone what you disabled, and most likely, similar to the other sheep who "tweak" their system, you'll blame Microsoft for everything and claim it's their fault.

Calling it now.

If you can disable something useful, you can get it back.

For easy tweaking (disabling services and such), one can just enable them again. For more professional tweaking, there are things called registry backups, system restore, LKGC, and drive images.

I messed up my computer many times. What did I do? System Repair. System Restore. Registry Backup.

You can't make your system useless. :)

Microsoft is to blame for some things. Like some desktop icons becoming transparent or explorer not refreshing after copy/move commands in certain situations.

None. I don't see the point in turning features off or 'optimising' the operating system - with 4 GB of RAM in my machine 10 or 20 MB being used by a service don't bother me.

We're not in 2001 anymore, trying to make XP run well on machines with 256 MB of RAM.

Me too.

Removed all high contrast/basic themes, also removed all other themes except for Windows 7 theme (I think without that one it is a no go). Also removed the web folder (it holds wallpapers to accompany the themes).

NTFS compressed the backup folder in winsxs - saved about 100MB of space. Also removed elements in winsxs dealing with defender, mail, and homegroup.

All works for now.

why?.... really. WHY?

Removed all high contrast/basic themes, also removed all other themes except for Windows 7 theme (I think without that one it is a no go). Also removed the web folder (it holds wallpapers to accompany the themes).

NTFS compressed the backup folder in winsxs - saved about 100MB of space. Also removed elements in winsxs dealing with defender, mail, and homegroup.

All works for now.

It might work....for now.

But winsxs, or windows Side by Side Assembly, is used to eliminate dll hell.

It stores multiple versions of dll files to prevent problems with version conflicts, missing and duplicate DLLs, and incorrect or missing registration. This reduces dependency problems for applications that include an SxS manifest.

So, enjoy your crippled machine....while it lasts!!!!

Source: Wikipedia

I cannot believe such crap from people in this thread, everyone is jumping down throats saying omg your crippling your system omg you disabled IE , grow up will ya.

The point is they are crippling their systems, disabling components such as IE using turn windows components on/off or disabling services are not a problem but removing things like files from the winSxS is crippling the system as those files are needed to prevent problems later.

Edited by neo158
The point is they are crippling their systems, disabling components such as IE using turn windows components on/off or disabling services are not a problem but removing things like files from the winSxS is crippling the system as those files are needed to prevent problems later.

OK so what big deal? if that person wishes to do so let them instead of being immature about it. To say somone is crippling their system by removing IE or Windows Components hardly says that the computer is crippled. If I wish to disable IE or System Restore who cares? It's my system to mess with, Yes I agree some people dont know what they are doing but for those like me who do, lay off will ya.

OK so what big deal? if that person wishes to do so let them instead of being immature about it. To say somone is crippling their system by removing IE or Windows Components hardly says that the computer is crippled. If I wish to disable IE or System Restore who cares? It's my system to mess with, Yes I agree some people dont know what they are doing but for those like me who do, lay off will ya.

Maybe you should calm down a bit before posting, I wasn't even talking about windows components, all I'm saying is that when people start deleting critical system files to disable features then that's crippling the system.

The sad fact is that some of those people will then come on here and say that windows 7 is rubbish because they deleted files and it stopped working.

Edited by neo158
It looks like I'm the only one who hasn't disabled anything, I feel like a newbie. :p
I haven't disabled anything, and I'm a ******* pro.

You are not alone, I too am an IT professional, and I don't disable anything yet. I've not found things bothersome in Win7 to bother with tweaking. I tweaked XP out back in the day, I tweaked Vista a little, and I've not found a good reason to start tweaking W7. It simply does a great job so far. I may go in and disable a few things from the start up menu that do not need to be running, but that'd be it. Probably I won't do it though. I'm happy with W7. (Y)

You are not alone, I too am an IT professional, and I don't disable anything yet. I've not found things bothersome in Win7 to bother with tweaking. I tweaked XP out back in the day, I tweaked Vista a little, and I've not found a good reason to start tweaking W7. It simply does a great job so far. I may go in and disable a few things from the start up menu that do not need to be running, but that'd be it. Probably I won't do it though. I'm happy with W7. (Y)

Same here, and I also run 7 HP on a netbook without any issues.

Maybe you should calm down a bit before posting, I wasn't even talking about windows components, all I'm saying is that when people start deleting critical system files to disable features then that's crippling the system.

The sad fact is that some of those people will then come on here and say that windows 7 is rubbish because they deleted files and it stopped working.

Exactly, I found that out back when I was all into tweaking XP. I finally reached a point where I realized it was largely counter productive with the quality of hadware availible these days. I even stopped OC'ing my system as a result. It just isnt' worth the trouble anymore.

Exactly, I found that out back when I was all into tweaking XP. I finally reached a point where I realized it was largely counter productive with the quality of hadware availible these days. I even stopped OC'ing my system as a result. It just isnt' worth the trouble anymore.

I totally agree, the way I look at it Windows 7 is pretty much optimised for the hardware available these days anyway. I also feel that the only ones that know windows 7 well enough to tweak it are Microsoft themselves.

Many of the "tweaks" that are out there probably came from Microsoft in the first place. The issue with applying them is that the vast majority are for use under special circumstances. Obviously, there are many hardware configurations that must be supported by Windows, and it does a fine job running on many systems, however, some people run with unusual hardware combinations, or atypical usage scenarios that might not work optimally under the default Windows configuration. In these cases, tweaks may be warranted.

Need to run a kiosk? By all means, strip the system. Using some obscure hard drive setup on an archaic motherboard? Might need to tweak a few registry settings. Average user? Windows is already set up for you, so there is no need to touch it.

I've dealt with people who have followed tweaking guides and ended up creating problems for themselves.

My computer keeps popping up this error box every 20 minutes, what can I do?

After establishing that it doesn't look like malware... Have you tried System Restoring to sometime before this happened?

There are no restore points listed.

Did you disable System restore? (Yes, they did). Ok, when was the last time you updated Windows?

I never update Windows, my friend says that that's how Microsoft spies on me.

That's bull****, run Windows Update. If it doesn't fix the issue, it at least will eliminate some variables.

I can't run Windows Update, it says that it can't find some DLL file.

Ok, list for me all the tweaks that you've applied to this computer.

I've applied regtweaks.reg that I found on a forum.

Mother****er...

I cannot believe such crap from people in this thread, everyone is jumping down throats saying omg your crippling your system omg you disabled IE , grow up will ya.

Do you even have the slightest idea how many applications depend on Internet Explorer? Winamp, for example, uses it, as well as countless other applications. Internet Explorer isn't just an application, it's also framework. It might not be such a big deal in Windows 7, but disabling it before sometimes (more times than not) resulted in severe issues with programs that contacted the internet, as well as Windows Explorer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!