Is it possible to use Windows XP's explorer.exe in Windows 7?


Recommended Posts

In previous versions of windows your could get the shell/file manager from ReactOS to run as the Windows Shell. Might still work, haven't tried to replace the shell in Win 7 yet.

http://www.foxplanet.de/explorer/index.html

ok well my mother witch is computer illiterate and has only used XP for 3 years now has windows 7 on her machine her used machin with 1.5gb of ram AMD athlon XP 2200+ and a 17" CRT screen and she did not have to ask me what to do in 7 she very quickly understood how things worked .

Now as far as your 2x 1024 screens go i understand i dont have the cnage myself but you can get now days but it always hits the wrong time of month for me 20" screens 20" wides for 140 or less way way less a friend of mine just got a 23" Asus for $99 on -sale it was a 2 day thing not sure where he got it but he got it fast and it is 1920x1080 rez.

I don't mean to be offensive or anything, but reading that gave me a headache, I really wish people wouldn't use text speak on message boards

ok well my mother witch is computer illiterate and has only used XP for 3 years now has windows 7 on her machine her used machin with 1.5gb of ram AMD athlon XP 2200+ and a 17" CRT screen and she did not have to ask me what to do in 7 she very quickly understood how things worked .

well thats good for yer mother

my sister is in a similar setup, Windows Vista on a 2.4GHz Pentium 4, 1GB DDR266, onboard i845 video with an i865 driver loaded, CD-RW, 40GB IDE. it works very well enough for her, but i couldn't use the machine for longer than it took me to set it up that way.

Now as far as your 2x 1024 screens go i understand i dont have the cnage myself but you can get now days but it always hits the wrong time of month for me 20" screens 20" wides for 140 or less way way less a friend of mine just got a 23" Asus for $99 on -sale it was a 2 day thing not sure where he got it but he got it fast and it is 1920x1080 rez.

both my screens were free for the taking, and one of them has television video hookups as an added bonus.

i have considered buying a larger screen before, and i used to use a 19 inch CRT at 1600x1200 up to a couple months ago.

really, i am not up to buying monitors. i just put brakes and a lil front end work into my minivan for about the same amount as a pair of $140 monitors. clearly my priorities are elsewhere, and i am satisfied with Windows XP on a pair of 15 inch XGA LCD screens.

In previous versions of windows your could get the shell/file manager from ReactOS to run as the Windows Shell. Might still work, haven't tried to replace the shell in Win 7 yet.

http://www.foxplanet.de/explorer/index.html

that would be pretty interesting thing to get going :)

  • 1 month later...

I just joined here to see, if there's been any progress or new info on this topic, since I'd really like to keep on using the Explorer UI from Windows XP. It's just somewhat slower to use in Win7 than in XP. Too many clicks on that Superbar to do what I want to do.

What I wish for, is that I could have the exact same thing I had with Windows XP, because that's what I have optimized for my useage scenario (nLite just rocks... otherwise I'd be gone from Windows a long long time ago)... I only want to have DirectX 10 and 11 to put my graphics card to good use and the TRIM functionality of the Win7 kernel.

Anyways, I at least finally got my hands on a rather useable version of Windows 7 (free Windows Embedded 7 RC from MS Connect), but I still think it's rather bloated (hell, it's more than 2gig after installing it with only WMP and IE... I do fit in XP, WMP, Firefox, Pidgin, Office and Visual Studio in that!).

Oh, and my XP looks better... I'm using the Advance4[xp]/pro msstyle on it. I'll try to get at least that one working on Win7 now.

Greetings

Decryphe

Well, since Explorer.exe from XP doesn't seem to work at all in Win7 (WinDbg supposes it crashes in RegSetValueW... just wtf?), is there any way to get the "old" task bar and start menu to Win7?

And what about using an old MSSTYLE with Win7? And no, I don't account it worthwile to get WindowBlinds, it's too expensive for what it would do for me (i.e. enabling what I already use with XP).

Getting the best of both worlds would be the optimum for me...

Greetings

Decryphe

Well, since Explorer.exe from XP doesn't seem to work at all in Win7 (WinDbg supposes it crashes in RegSetValueW... just wtf?), is there any way to get the "old" task bar and start menu to Win7?

And what about using an old MSSTYLE with Win7? And no, I don't account it worthwile to get WindowBlinds, it's too expensive for what it would do for me (i.e. enabling what I already use with XP).

Getting the best of both worlds would be the optimum for me...

Greetings

Decryphe

So you want it to look like Windows XP and function like Windows XP... Why don't you just stick with Windows XP and save us all a headache?

So you want it to look like Windows XP and function like Windows XP... Why don't you just stick with Windows XP and save us all a headache?

How is it giving you a headache? You didn't have to reply or even read this thread, and honestly if you have nothing helpful to contribute why bother? I hate the people that love to s**t all over other people's choices because they don't share the same opinion, as if the universe revolves around them and what they like.

Also for the morons saying "Well why don't you just stick with XP" did you ever stop to think that maybe someone that likes the appearance of XP would still like to have the latest kernel, security updates and other features? Personally if there was a way to get the XP classic shell to run on 7 I'd jump on it in a heartbeat, because to me Aero is fugly and the new Windows Explorer sucks.

Now to the original poster, I was able to get the shell from ReactOS working in Vista so it should work in 7 I think, and there are some nice alternative file managers out there as others have pointed out. I haven't tried the Classic Shell mod yet but it looks very interesting. :)

So you want it to look like Windows XP and function like Windows XP... Why don't you just stick with Windows XP and save us all a headache?

Because I still would rather like some improvements from Win7 over what XP can do. I already named two examples.

  • 2 weeks later...

This is quite possibly the most stupidest and ridiculous thing I've ever heard of anyone doing.

You really need to man up and accept the new Win7 explorer.

How is it giving you a headache? You didn't have to reply or even read this thread, and honestly if you have nothing helpful to contribute why bother? I hate the people that love to s**t all over other people's choices because they don't share the same opinion, as if the universe revolves around them and what they like.

Also for the morons saying "Well why don't you just stick with XP" did you ever stop to think that maybe someone that likes the appearance of XP would still like to have the latest kernel, security updates and other features? Personally if there was a way to get the XP classic shell to run on 7 I'd jump on it in a heartbeat, because to me Aero is fugly and the new Windows Explorer sucks.

Now to the original poster, I was able to get the shell from ReactOS working in Vista so it should work in 7 I think, and there are some nice alternative file managers out there as others have pointed out. I haven't tried the Classic Shell mod yet but it looks very interesting. :)

Because we're talking about the bigger picture here, and what's essentially better for the operating system. If you don't want Windows 7, you simply don't use it. There's no point in Frankensteining it like this. If it really ****es him off, there are so many damn alternative shells.

This is quite possibly the most stupidest and ridiculous thing I've ever heard of anyone doing.

You really need to man up and accept the new Win7 explorer.

Because we're talking about the bigger picture here, and what's essentially better for the operating system. If you don't want Windows 7, you simply don't use it. There's no point in Frankensteining it like this. If it really ****es him off, there are so many damn alternative shells.

I wouldn't have put it so strongly, but I have to agree with your point.

If you don't like the way Windows 7 does certain things, such as present Windows Explorer, then don't use it. Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP and Windows Vista still exist and still work, and many, many people still use them. (I have an aunt who still uses Windows 95 full-time to this day). Not only is trying to shoehorn XP's Explorer into 7 going to be a tough task, it probably won't even work in the first place.

Thus, I must agree... If you want to use Windows 7, then accept that it works differently from what you're used to. And that's what you'll often find with software... What we perceive as better/worse is really just different. People often forget how radically different XP was compared to 98, and what horror stories we heard about it when it was first released. But then people got used to it, and then liked it.

Windows 7 != Windows 7 Explorer? Why is it so hard for some people to accept that there may be someone who like the rest of Win 7 save for Windows Explorer? And rather than looking for alternatives they should ditch Windows 7 altogether? If you don't like an application (say, IE, for example) do you ditch the entire OS or simply move to a replacement? And what if none of the third party replacements were suited to your taste but an older version of the application was?

Going back to the problem, how about sharing all the drives from Windows 7 with read/write permissions and running XP Mode or VBox in seamless mode. Then use the Windows Explorer from XP to browse the shared folders instead. Accessing shares from W7 will need a password, so being careful while handing the passwords out and not giving XP access to the Internet (using VBox host-only networking) would keep you quite safe as well.

I'm too lazy to check for sure, but Explorer.exe is probably tied to Winlogon.exe and even low level stuff like Ntoskrnl.exe in each respective Windows version. As such, all those things would have to be emulated properly and a pretty hefty wrapper would be needed to successfully port it. I wouldn't say it's impossible, but it's extremely unlikely that anyone will take up that task.

I would suggest searching for an alternate file manager.

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to chime in, Explorer is not only a file manager, but it also handles your start menu, desktop, and a bunch of other things as well. It's not going to happen. Ever.

To be honest though, I'm using the classic shell extension and a couple other tweaks, my explorer is actually rather similar to XP's now, but still retains all the good things that Win7 adds. Very similar to my old Explorer + FindeXer + a few other shell extension combo's, including the old file menu and bottom status bar. Also use Hidden Files Toggle, HashTab and a few others.

post-225934-12685215030938_thumb.png

  • 3 months later...
Also for the morons saying "Well why don't you just stick with XP" did you ever stop to think that maybe someone that likes the appearance of XP would still like to have the latest kernel, security updates and other features? Personally if there was a way to get the XP classic shell to run on 7 I'd jump on it in a heartbeat, because to me Aero is fugly and the new Windows Explorer sucks.

Whoa, fire!..:) Anyway, The new Windows Explorer can be configured.. just a few options + stuff like this:

http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/8955/make-backspace-in-windows-7-or-vista-explorer-go-up-like-xp-did/

.. prolly this ****'ll get fixed with Service Pack 1; besides Windows 7 Windows Explorer has in-line search and just that is the reason to have Windows 7. Best thing would be to run the Windows 7 explorer.exe shell on Windows XP actually.

[.]] I'm using the classic shell extension and [..]

^^ How's that the classic shell? o.0

Edited by Colin-uk
please dont bypass the swear filter - thanks.

Why on earth would you use classic theme in Windows 7 ? That is the most retarded thing ever, as it looks insanely terrible. Just get used to Aero already.

Some people like the look of classic better? Not everyone is like you :rolleyes:

Some people like the look of classic better? Not everyone is like you :rolleyes:

It's not meant to be used in Windows 7. The UI was not designed with it in mind. Note how ugly the start menu, start button, explorer windows, etc are in it. Nevermind the fact that calculator and other windows 7 programs don't look proper in it either. Also, classic is 15 years old, FIFTEEN YEARS, you realize how old that is in tech years? No other OS still carries around such an old look!

How many people in MacOSX make it look like system7 ? How many Ubuntu users make it look like old X11 with the extremely basic square buttons and stuff? So why are people in 2010 using a 2009 version of windows with an awesome, GPU-accelerated and much smoother GUI, gimp it down to cpu-driven non-composited ugly windows 95 rubbish that looks way out of place with windows 7's design?

If someone can't stand the way windows 7 looks and feels, then they should keep using an ancient OS that matches their ancient way of thinking. People who cannot adapt to new things, or accept change, only hold the rest of the world back from advancing. Look at the people in the dark ages afraid of discovering any technology, because they were afraid of change.. kept humanity back for centuries. The reason XP is STILL around in such high numbers is because so many people are afraid to adapt to change (to windows 7). Why is it when Windows 3.1 upgraded to 95, not so many people had this problem? However, XP to 7 is like.. OMG CANT ADAPT! MUST KEEP OLD WAY!

I know not all change is good, but in Windows 7 case.. change is definitely, definitely good.

It's not meant to be used in Windows 7. The UI was not designed with it in mind. Note how ugly the start menu, start button, explorer windows, etc are in it. Nevermind the fact that calculator and other windows 7 programs don't look proper in it either. Also, classic is 15 years old, FIFTEEN YEARS, you realize how old that is in tech years? No other OS still carries around such an old look!

It's not because it's old and ugly to YOU that it doesn't work for other people

How many people in MacOSX make it look like system7 ? How many Ubuntu users make it look like old X11 with the extremely basic square buttons and stuff? So why are people in 2010 using a 2009 version of windows with an awesome, GPU-accelerated and much smoother GUI, gimp it down to cpu-driven non-composited ugly windows 95 rubbish that looks way out of place with windows 7's design?

Windows still gives you the option to have the classic look, OSX doesn't let you make the OS look like system7 and Ubuntu can have ANY window manager you want so you can make it look as old as you want (see xubuntu etc)

If someone can't stand the way windows 7 looks and feels, then they should keep using an ancient OS that matches their ancient way of thinking. People who cannot adapt to new things, or accept change, only hold the rest of the world back from advancing. Look at the people in the dark ages afraid of discovering any technology, because they were afraid of change.. kept humanity back for centuries. The reason XP is STILL around in such high numbers is because so many people are afraid to adapt to change (to windows 7). Why is it when Windows 3.1 upgraded to 95, not so many people had this problem? However, XP to 7 is like.. OMG CANT ADAPT! MUST KEEP OLD WAY!

I know not all change is good, but in Windows 7 case.. change is definitely, definitely good.

You're always the first one to moan when you see people still using XP so I would have expected you to be happier about people using 7 and the classic look :shifty:

I think you care a little too much about the way the OS look and not enough about the functionality behind it. To be honest with you a corporation running ~1000 workstations used solely for email and basic internet browsing will be more than fine running XP, there's no reason for them at the moment to upgrade to 7. When support for XP is pulled off then it will make sense for security purposes but right now Win7 won't make anything better for them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!