Palm Pre UK Review


Recommended Posts

Just a quick phone history, I’ve owned the following phones:

Motorola Startac, Nokia 7600, Nokia 8800, SE K750i, K800, K810i, K850i, Iphone 3G and some others.

Device itself

The device itself is no different from the USA model. Featuring only the volume keys on the side, the front button, power switch and silence button.

Hardware

The quality of the device is subpar. It is not built to last to be frank. My device was “faulty” when I first got it. The problem is that the phone slider results in the phone moving side to side when closed and opened! This is known as the “oreo” effect. That however isnt the only problem, when the phone is closed you can see the edges dont line up, its a sloppy finish. Some areas around the keyboard CREAK too.

Whilst this phone is pretty cheap in the USA, Canada etc, this phone is the same price as the Iphone 3G in the UK. So it is not a cheap device to buy. O2 provide a two year warranty, and I highly recommend the insurance if you do want the Palm Pre.

O2 will provide you with 14 day cooling off period, so if there is a problem RETURN IT, within 30 days you have can return the device for another Palm Pre. After 30 days tough luck is the general stance unless you have insurance.

Keyboard, I personally like it, however after some use the keys don’t feel tactile anymore, just feel flat!

Battery life is pretty bad, so bad infact that I really don’t want to use it as my primary phone, until they improve it via firmware updates. Basically you sent an alarm before going to bed with 60% battery, and it will have died before your 7am alarm!

WebOS

Running on 1.3.1 the device is fast. Initially we in the UK got some really old school firmware, which resulted in the phone being sluggish and difficult to use. As well as the fact that you couldn’t transfer contacts via Vcards. The new firmware is good, but a large number of features are still absent or poorly executed.

Currently the phone can’t seem to update the time when you go aboard, this is a basic feature that most phones for the last 10 years have had! You go aboard and the phone tells you to manually update the time!

Contacts: The idea of pulling all your contacts from Gmail, facebook is great! However I really don’t need to have the email address of some company I contacted years ago! Also there is poor support for hotmail, yahoo! (yahoo was supposed to be available with the new firmware, but was pulled from the GSM update). Hotmail isn’t officially supported so you have to use the manual settings found online. Also when you want to quickly check a number you won’t, for some reason it feels as though the contacts are not stored on the device but on the “cloud” so there is a delay, sometimes a few seconds before the contacts appear. Which is way too long (talking 5,6 seconds). Also YOUR number is not stored anywhere on the device, unlike every Sony Ericsson (just press the volume key), iphone (in the contacts), etc.

Also there is NO BLUETOOTH file send option for contacts or pictures etc. You can not receive files either. And NO FILE manager.

Camera: No options to do anything, just point and shoot like a teen watching porn! no video or autofocus either.

App store: With the new firmware 1.3.1 the GSM lot went from 100 apps to about 20 something. They are all useless! apps like to judge lighting conditions etc. NO PAID apps either.

Calendar: The calendar is nice but poorly done here too, for some reason it doesn’t automatically download people’s birthdays from any accounts, and no facebook events will appear UNLESS you accept them via facebook on your pc.

Also chat features for yahoo, hotmail etc are not available, and there are NO apps for this. Including Skype. So you won’t be able to use any of them with the Palm Pre.

Browser: Its great, websites all open smoothly, however scrolling through one quickly the device will show you the checker pattern, indicating you have to wait. Which isnt good seeing as how this device uses the same hardware as the iphone 3GS.

Email: I said somewhere, but its poor. If your only using Gmail then its great, but if you were using Gmail and google services then you should really be buying a Android device! For things like hotmail, yahoo etc there is NO FOLDER SUPPORT! and you dont get JUNK MAIL folder! so basically a new friend sends you an email, goes to junk mail, you cant check it with the inbuilt email app, you need to go to m.hotmail.com to check the junk mail. There is no folder support, so if i make a folder called "work" it wont appear on the device when syncing/setting up.

Multitasking: it’s great, until you open a few apps, then the phone comes really slow!

Homebrew

It’s pretty cool, however most of the applications and patches are those that Palm should really have addressed, not the community. Like the Mp3 player, the fact that palm included a player that you couldn’t fast forward etc is just shameful. The fact that I can’t set an alarm for say 7.24am ( only in increments of 5), the same for the calendar times,

Conclusion

I really like the software, it’s nice, feels light and easy to use, however it’s a half baked device.

Bottom line, it is not worth it! Remember this device will end up costing you at least ?700 over the contract, and it’s priced the same as the iphone, which more apps, better built quality and is more mature software wise.

Unless Palm come out with revisions to the hardware and really put some effort behind the WebOS it’s just not worth buying or even looking into. Right now it feels more of a side project for Palm that their pride and joy! In terms of development, they haven't figured out how to use ALL the hardware, which is pretty bad. Much like an automotive manufacturer including air conditioning, but not knowing how to get the knobs to work!

Also in the UK you get a FREE touchstone charger! which is cool. Had the device been priced alot cheaper then i think most of the issues you could overlook, but at a premium price and ?90 upfront for the phone (depending on which contract you want) it can not be overlooked.

Edited by peacemf
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/857486-palm-pre-uk-review/
Share on other sites

wow! what a pos phone. Thank God, i didn't pick one from eBay. I thought Palm Pre on Sprint got pretty good reviews and people were happy with it. Have you updated your phone to 1.3.5 btw ?

not available in europe :) , much like most apps in the app catalog :(

its supposed to be out in jan, but we'll see...

its a minor update really, still no video recording or any proper apps blah blah blah.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!