iTunes gets on my tits


Recommended Posts

Dear Apple,

Surely it is not beyond the realms of possibility or programmatically impossible to let people with multiple iPods, iPod Touches and/or iPhones, to use different libraries easily.

Instead of the rather stupid faffing about with pressing shift whilst clicking on the iTunes icon then having to search for the relevant library files - which is a ball ache - why can we not have a button or drop down with choices as to which library we want to use?

Even better, as soon as you plug in your iWhatever, which as we all know have their own unique ID - for DRM purposes I suspect, iTunes just automatically selects which library is relevent to that device.

I have over the last few weeks become accustomed to your idiosyncratic software, which still doesn't have a 'stop button' - pretty much every other music player/software I have used does so why not you, is that not 'Apple' enough for you?

Please include this feature in future releases.

As with all things Apple - Great Hardware, crap software.

Hopefully

//tucker

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/858756-itunes-gets-on-my-tits/
Share on other sites

I would agree on the multiple libraries, I know people who have a family PC with everything on they use for their iPods, etc.

It should really be sorted.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

Makes sense, like traffic lights who's buttons don't do anything since they are all timed anyway, lol.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

Ahh no what I meant was sort of in the rare situation where for instance, you're enjoying a song, someone walks in ruins it has a conversation with you and after the conversation you want to restart, it's best to go Stop > Play.

Whereas just hitting Previous would restart the song in their presence.

Also does iTunes do videos? If so I can see this being good for videos too for some reason, maybe force of habit.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

I need a stop button on foobar, otherwise it would not release the soundcard (because I'm using WASAPI exclusive mode).

But I guess that's not related to iTunes... :p

I to which it could be more inteligent in manging multiple devices but Apple have decided that one user will have their own account and one iPod.

I found the same issues and come up with the following solutions:

1. Set up a user account for each person that has a device, then they all have their own libraries.

You could store all of the music in a shared folder then there would be no permissions issues and no doubling up of music.

2. Set up playlists for each iPod. Connect an iPod and set it to only sync it's specific playlist

Yeah, I'd just sync the iPod with a specific playlist as Toga suggested. I can't think of any music players that actually support multiple libraries that sync with multiple devices as you have suggested.

I can also think of a number of features I'd prefer to see before anything you are suggesting gets implemented.

1. Backup and restore to HD or USB HD instead of DVD-Rs. Drives me nuts how when I reinstall iTunes I pretty much lose all my play history.

2. Actually tag files when I change information, not just the database file. That is super annoying, again because when I reinstall iTunes or move my music to a new machine all my genera changes etc. are lost.

You guys just don't understand how to use it, having a stop button is redundant and not necessary, you can do exactly what a stop button would with the pause button,

in fact there is a stop button you just don't know how to see it, click on music in the sidebar, play a song now pause it, then click on videos or something else in the sidebar, look up and what used to be a pause button is now a stop button.

I do not see the need for multiple libraries when you can sync a particular device to a playlist, a playlist is a library within a library duh!

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

That's assuming people know that combo. A stop button is easier to understand. I have it on Winamp and VLC, I just wanted it on iTunes for 'my' easy of use.

Each to their own.

How many average users have multiple libraries?

It's not necessarily that people have multiple libraries as multiple ipods. I only knew about libraries through googling. **** poor multiple ipod implementation by apple if you ask me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!