iTunes gets on my tits


Recommended Posts

Dear Apple,

Surely it is not beyond the realms of possibility or programmatically impossible to let people with multiple iPods, iPod Touches and/or iPhones, to use different libraries easily.

Instead of the rather stupid faffing about with pressing shift whilst clicking on the iTunes icon then having to search for the relevant library files - which is a ball ache - why can we not have a button or drop down with choices as to which library we want to use?

Even better, as soon as you plug in your iWhatever, which as we all know have their own unique ID - for DRM purposes I suspect, iTunes just automatically selects which library is relevent to that device.

I have over the last few weeks become accustomed to your idiosyncratic software, which still doesn't have a 'stop button' - pretty much every other music player/software I have used does so why not you, is that not 'Apple' enough for you?

Please include this feature in future releases.

As with all things Apple - Great Hardware, crap software.

Hopefully

//tucker

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/858756-itunes-gets-on-my-tits/
Share on other sites

I would agree on the multiple libraries, I know people who have a family PC with everything on they use for their iPods, etc.

It should really be sorted.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

Makes sense, like traffic lights who's buttons don't do anything since they are all timed anyway, lol.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

Ahh no what I meant was sort of in the rare situation where for instance, you're enjoying a song, someone walks in ruins it has a conversation with you and after the conversation you want to restart, it's best to go Stop > Play.

Whereas just hitting Previous would restart the song in their presence.

Also does iTunes do videos? If so I can see this being good for videos too for some reason, maybe force of habit.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

I need a stop button on foobar, otherwise it would not release the soundcard (because I'm using WASAPI exclusive mode).

But I guess that's not related to iTunes... :p

I to which it could be more inteligent in manging multiple devices but Apple have decided that one user will have their own account and one iPod.

I found the same issues and come up with the following solutions:

1. Set up a user account for each person that has a device, then they all have their own libraries.

You could store all of the music in a shared folder then there would be no permissions issues and no doubling up of music.

2. Set up playlists for each iPod. Connect an iPod and set it to only sync it's specific playlist

Yeah, I'd just sync the iPod with a specific playlist as Toga suggested. I can't think of any music players that actually support multiple libraries that sync with multiple devices as you have suggested.

I can also think of a number of features I'd prefer to see before anything you are suggesting gets implemented.

1. Backup and restore to HD or USB HD instead of DVD-Rs. Drives me nuts how when I reinstall iTunes I pretty much lose all my play history.

2. Actually tag files when I change information, not just the database file. That is super annoying, again because when I reinstall iTunes or move my music to a new machine all my genera changes etc. are lost.

You guys just don't understand how to use it, having a stop button is redundant and not necessary, you can do exactly what a stop button would with the pause button,

in fact there is a stop button you just don't know how to see it, click on music in the sidebar, play a song now pause it, then click on videos or something else in the sidebar, look up and what used to be a pause button is now a stop button.

I do not see the need for multiple libraries when you can sync a particular device to a playlist, a playlist is a library within a library duh!

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

That's assuming people know that combo. A stop button is easier to understand. I have it on Winamp and VLC, I just wanted it on iTunes for 'my' easy of use.

Each to their own.

How many average users have multiple libraries?

It's not necessarily that people have multiple libraries as multiple ipods. I only knew about libraries through googling. **** poor multiple ipod implementation by apple if you ask me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!