iTunes gets on my tits


Recommended Posts

Dear Apple,

Surely it is not beyond the realms of possibility or programmatically impossible to let people with multiple iPods, iPod Touches and/or iPhones, to use different libraries easily.

Instead of the rather stupid faffing about with pressing shift whilst clicking on the iTunes icon then having to search for the relevant library files - which is a ball ache - why can we not have a button or drop down with choices as to which library we want to use?

Even better, as soon as you plug in your iWhatever, which as we all know have their own unique ID - for DRM purposes I suspect, iTunes just automatically selects which library is relevent to that device.

I have over the last few weeks become accustomed to your idiosyncratic software, which still doesn't have a 'stop button' - pretty much every other music player/software I have used does so why not you, is that not 'Apple' enough for you?

Please include this feature in future releases.

As with all things Apple - Great Hardware, crap software.

Hopefully

//tucker

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/858756-itunes-gets-on-my-tits/
Share on other sites

I would agree on the multiple libraries, I know people who have a family PC with everything on they use for their iPods, etc.

It should really be sorted.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

The need for a stop button is kind of psychological I think in a way, but at the same time sometimes it's useful to stop a song and then restart from the beginning. If someone walks in when you're listening to a song and they spoil it for you, you can press stop and then press play when they've gone, rather than pause, rewind, play... I guess!?

Makes sense, like traffic lights who's buttons don't do anything since they are all timed anyway, lol.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

But in iTunes there is three buttons, Previous, Pause and Next. Hitting Previous will do what you just said, it will start the song playing from the beginning, unless its in the first few seconds at which point it will go back a song.

Ahh no what I meant was sort of in the rare situation where for instance, you're enjoying a song, someone walks in ruins it has a conversation with you and after the conversation you want to restart, it's best to go Stop > Play.

Whereas just hitting Previous would restart the song in their presence.

Also does iTunes do videos? If so I can see this being good for videos too for some reason, maybe force of habit.

Though one question, why do you need a stop button if the pause button does essentially the same?

I understand the need for devices that require user input for changing media, say, a DVD player, but surely with digital music having a stop and pause button is useless?

I need a stop button on foobar, otherwise it would not release the soundcard (because I'm using WASAPI exclusive mode).

But I guess that's not related to iTunes... :p

I to which it could be more inteligent in manging multiple devices but Apple have decided that one user will have their own account and one iPod.

I found the same issues and come up with the following solutions:

1. Set up a user account for each person that has a device, then they all have their own libraries.

You could store all of the music in a shared folder then there would be no permissions issues and no doubling up of music.

2. Set up playlists for each iPod. Connect an iPod and set it to only sync it's specific playlist

Yeah, I'd just sync the iPod with a specific playlist as Toga suggested. I can't think of any music players that actually support multiple libraries that sync with multiple devices as you have suggested.

I can also think of a number of features I'd prefer to see before anything you are suggesting gets implemented.

1. Backup and restore to HD or USB HD instead of DVD-Rs. Drives me nuts how when I reinstall iTunes I pretty much lose all my play history.

2. Actually tag files when I change information, not just the database file. That is super annoying, again because when I reinstall iTunes or move my music to a new machine all my genera changes etc. are lost.

You guys just don't understand how to use it, having a stop button is redundant and not necessary, you can do exactly what a stop button would with the pause button,

in fact there is a stop button you just don't know how to see it, click on music in the sidebar, play a song now pause it, then click on videos or something else in the sidebar, look up and what used to be a pause button is now a stop button.

I do not see the need for multiple libraries when you can sync a particular device to a playlist, a playlist is a library within a library duh!

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

restarting the song by clicking pause and then the previous button is the same as clicking stop and then play, both 2 clicks what is the difference?

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

Took the words right out of my mouth. Stop then Play, Pause then Previous - what's the difference?!

That's assuming people know that combo. A stop button is easier to understand. I have it on Winamp and VLC, I just wanted it on iTunes for 'my' easy of use.

Each to their own.

How many average users have multiple libraries?

It's not necessarily that people have multiple libraries as multiple ipods. I only knew about libraries through googling. **** poor multiple ipod implementation by apple if you ask me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!