Most Pirated Games of 2009


Recommended Posts

Source

As 2009 is slowly moving toward its end, we follow up our most pirated movies chart by taking a look at the most pirated games of the year. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is the absolute winner on the PC and Xbox 360, while New Super Mario Bros. scoops the title of most pirated Wii game of 2009.

With 4.1 million unauthorized downloads of the PC version alone, the game more than doubles the achievement of last year?s ?winner? Spore. Modern Warfare 2 leads both the PC and Xbox 360 lists, by a landslide. The overall trend across all platforms is that, unlike last year, all of the games are 2009 releases. What makes Modern Warfare 2?s chart-topping even more impressive is that this has been achieved after just two months of availability. We further see that the figures for the most downloaded titles have more than doubled compared to last year, equaling the growth in uTorrent users.

PC games are by far the most downloaded titles, with on average more than three times the number of downloads compared to Xbox 360 and Wii releases. As expected, Mario titles are in high demand on the Wii.

The data for these lists is collected by TorrentFreak from several sources, including reports from all public BitTorrent trackers. All the data is carefully checked and possible inaccuracies are systematically corrected.

post-34384-1262133006_thumb.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/860306-most-pirated-games-of-2009/
Share on other sites

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

I'm pretty sure developers/publishers don't see it your way either.

Don't get me wrong though, your point is perfectly valid if the people are already heavy 'torrent-ers'.

The reason that the CoD games are pirated so much is because the pricing is rediculously high, even on Steam CoD 4 is still ?29.99

IMO, if Activision get more realistic about pricing, piracy would drop.

Exactly! It's still $120NZD for the PC, which is a damn right rip-off!

The figures don't mean much.

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Exactly.

If you didn't buy it, you shouldn't play it.

Since there's no way to "try before you buy" with most pc games these days, meaning there's no demo released, no rentals (unlike console games), and a "no return policy" standard everywhere, then piracy is the only option.

Most games are total trash anyway, and I would be very ****ed if I had dropped $40-60 on a crap title and couldn't get my money back. Used to be it was no problem returning an opened title for a full cash refund, but piracy killed that for all of us.

The whole issue is really a catch-22 the way I see it. Crap games, high prices, and no return policies cause piracy, yet piracy causes crap games, high prices, and no return policies.

Not to mention these damn game studios either not supporting their titles, or using their paying customers as beta testers. Sometimes both.

Sometimes they even screw their customers outright. Horse Armor anyone?

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

I doubt that since most would want online play, or have the legal copy on their hands. I know many of people who wouldn't act as you said.

I doubt that since most would want online play, or have the legal copy on their hands. I know many of people who wouldn't act as you said.

The point is that those people do exist and as long as they do developers will do everything in their power to make-up for lost sales, e.g. Increasing the price.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

If he was thinking about saving up for the game and didn't, then it's not a potential sale lost either. The majority of people who pirate would never have purchased the software/game to begin with. Game publishers in that regard can't complain about losing something they were never going to get to begin with.

If I decide not to purchase a game from a brick and mortar store because I think it's too expensive, and I don't download it either, is that lost sale counted in all those statistics as well? No it's not and everything will be lumped under the guise of "piracy" to justify why they aren't making the money they think they should be making.

Edited by iamwhoiam

And now Activision has the justification they need in order to neglect PC development even further. Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but I can't shake the feeling that Activision and IW neutered the PC version of MW2 on purpose, in order to stir the people into a frenzy and get them to pirate the game out of anger. Now for all future Activision titles, whenever they're asked why there's no PC version, they can just point to MW2 and and the fact that it was pirated to hell.

The Wii piracy surprised me though. I didn't realize there was any significant amount of piracy on that platform.

If he was thinking about saving up for the game and didn't, then it's not a potential sale lost either. The majority of people who pirate would never have purchased the software/game to begin with. Game publishers in that regard can't complain about losing something they were never going to get to begin with.

So that gives people the right to download/steal the game that the developer/publisher have pumped money into creating?

It's a shame to see such high figures for the PC, I'm not surprised developers cut corners when adapting games for PC.

And cutting corners is only a way to increase piracy, not deter it. As a half-assed pos port isn't worth paying full, or even half price for. So that train of thought would only 'hurt' devs more.

MW2 is a great example. It's on top cause they pretty much cut out the ability to have decent multiplayer(console kiddies may enjoy home servers run on shared 128kbps dsl since they have no choice, but i don't). Basically removing half the game. They cut corners and it cost them.

Imagine a guy wanted MW2 and was thinking of saving up money for it, then he finds out that he can torrent it for free and decides there's no real point in purchasing it. One potential customer lost.

You just pointed out an excellent reason for pirating....if someone has to "save up for" a measly game, then there's a serious problem. When a game sells for $9.99 that was $49.99 just two years earlier, that tells me they are still making a profit on the $9.99 price and that greed accounted for the $40.00 hike two years earlier.

Then you also need to look at how they price vs. quality. More and more companies are basing their cost on the multi-player experience. For example, MW2 is very expensive. The single player main game can be completed in under 2 hours. If you don't like multi-player, you paid nearly $30 an hour for the game. Meanwhile, another game around the same cost (e.g., Dragon Age) provides hundreds of hours of single player gaming, making it cost about $0.50 an hour.

Now for all future Activision titles, whenever they're asked why there's no PC version, they can just point to MW2 and and the fact that it was pirated to hell.

Cutting out an entire market is a surefire way to make a business fail, especially in a terrible economy. If Activision is that stupid, so be it.

Another company will simply buy up what they can and the industry will move on as it always has. Just like Eidos and Looking Glass Studios and so many others before them.

i'm not surprised by the result, if activision wants more "lost sales" another price increase will help with their next game :rolleyes:

and if somehow possible make MP even worse and SP even shorter. :rolleyes:

then i'm sure all pc gamers will run to the shop to get it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!