Most Pirated Games of 2009


Recommended Posts

You just pointed out an excellent reason for pirating....if someone has to "save up for" a measly game, then there's a serious problem. When a game sells for $9.99 that was $49.99 just two years earlier, that tells me they are still making a profit on the $9.99 price and that greed accounted for the $40.00 hike two years earlier.
Supply and demand. The game couldn't sell for $50 indefinitely, anyone could tell you that. Likewise the reason they can sell things for $9.99 later is because the fact that it selling at $49.95 earlier on is what covered the actual costs to make the game, advertise it, pay wages for the publisher, developer, store ect ect.

The fact it goes to $9.99 two years later only means that the costs have probably been covered a long time a go and if they can make a few extra dollars down the road then it's a bonus on top of the previous revenue. By that point all they really need to cover is the distribution cost, wages ect should have long been accounted for if the game was half successful.

Some of the comments in this thread amaze me.

If there were no pirating in the first place -- as in, no way for pirates to download games -- do you honestly think that those people would simply stop gaming altogether? They'd just give up something they enjoy because they have to pay money for it? That argument makes no sense whatsoever to me. Of course there are always going to be people who wouldn't buy a game if there were no way to pirate it, but com'n... do you really think that makes up a significant portion of pirates?

The fact that the pirates own a gaming system tells me that clearly they want to game. And even if it's not a console, on the PC you generally have to have a fairly decent rig to run most of the games on that list. Not top of the line by any means, but you'd probably buy a PC knowing that you intend to use it for gaming.

As for games selling for $9.99 two years after release -- generally, that's not the work of the publisher. The MSRP is normally still well above that, it's just the retail chains' way of clearing inventory. And most of these highly pirated games are still within $10 of full price two years after release (see: the Call of Duty and Halo franchises).

The simple fact that people are trying to defend a practice that they know is wrong is what bothers me. Use whatever justifications you want to make yourself sleep better at night knowing you're sticking it to "the man," but you know what you're doing is wrong. Don't even try to deny it.

Yep as connections get faster each year, pirating will continue to increase sadly enough. I wonder how many people used the excuse "IW isn't using dedicated servers so I'm going to pirate the game", just so they wouldn't feel bad about it.

I did not buy or pirate the game. Not primarily because of protesting IW, but because I think it was a mediocre game, and a step backwards from MW. So you got more achievements, so what? It made the game into a cartoon, and the multiplayer was worse than MW's.

Haha

I love the Wii list.So true.

A must have game for Wii owners (and PC) :

Too bad that emulator(which is easy to figure out even with your censoring btw) is far, far too slow to run anything for wii(or GC).

Yep as connections get faster each year, pirating will continue to increase sadly enough. I wonder how many people used the excuse "IW isn't using dedicated servers so I'm going to pirate the game", just so they wouldn't feel bad about it.

I dont think people who didnt buy it feel in any way bad about pirating it.

Too bad that emulator(which is easy to figure out even with your censoring btw) is far, far too slow to run anything for wii(or GC).

Nope it is not.

For the meanwhile i am perfectly happy being able to run perfectly the only game i like on Wii on my PC.Maybe it is slow for other games but as i said i really dont like the other games Wii has to offer.

I sense you are a Wii owner? :D

Why do people feel the need to defend pirates I don't care how high the price is we live in a capitalist economy which gives us a lot of economic freedoms and if the price is too high then the sales will reflect that. By pirating something you are basically saying that the people who made the game's work is not worth your money but you want it anyway so you just take it. It's the same as if you thought that the work a mechanic did on your car wasn't worth what he charged you for it but you wanted the work done anyway so when he's done you just drive away and don't pay the only difference is you're more likely to get caught by the mechanic. If you feel a game is not worth it's price then don't buy it at that price wait for a sale or don't buy it and if you can't do that and you just have to have it then ok buy it but then you know it is worth the price you paid for it to you.

MW2 is a great example. It's on top cause they pretty much cut out the ability to have decent multiplayer(console kiddies may enjoy home servers run on shared 128kbps dsl since they have no choice, but i don't). Basically removing half the game. They cut corners and it cost them.

I'm not surprised they cut corners, they sold 4.7 million units only to have it pirated on PC alone 4.1 million times. (I realise that there are probably people in that figure that actually bought the game, still a shocking number).

Some of the comments in this thread amaze me.

If there were no pirating in the first place -- as in, no way for pirates to download games -- do you honestly think that those people would simply stop gaming altogether? They'd just give up something they enjoy because they have to pay money for it? That argument makes no sense whatsoever to me. Of course there are always going to be people who wouldn't buy a game if there were no way to pirate it, but com'n... do you really think that makes up a significant portion of pirates?

The fact that the pirates own a gaming system tells me that clearly they want to game. And even if it's not a console, on the PC you generally have to have a fairly decent rig to run most of the games on that list. Not top of the line by any means, but you'd probably buy a PC knowing that you intend to use it for gaming.

As for games selling for $9.99 two years after release -- generally, that's not the work of the publisher. The MSRP is normally still well above that, it's just the retail chains' way of clearing inventory. And most of these highly pirated games are still within $10 of full price two years after release (see: the Call of Duty and Halo franchises).

The simple fact that people are trying to defend a practice that they know is wrong is what bothers me. Use whatever justifications you want to make yourself sleep better at night knowing you're sticking it to "the man," but you know what you're doing is wrong. Don't even try to deny it.

Totally agree with you.

Why do people feel the need to defend pirates I don't care how high the price is we live in a capitalist economy which gives us a lot of economic freedoms and if the price is too high then the sales will reflect that. By pirating something you are basically saying that the people who made the game's work is not worth your money but you want it anyway so you just take it. It's the same as if you thought that the work a mechanic did on your car wasn't worth what he charged you for it but you wanted the work done anyway so when he's done you just drive away and don't pay the only difference is you're more likely to get caught by the mechanic. If you feel a game is not worth it's price then don't buy it at that price wait for a sale or don't buy it and if you can't do that and you just have to have it then ok buy it but then you know it is worth the price you paid for it to you.

QFT.

If you didn't buy it, you shouldn't play it.

most developers dont provide a demo for you to get a taste of what the game really is, without at least a demo a game aint worth buying but a demo helps. i know if i didnt have a demo to try i would never buy that game but a demo allows me to get a glimpse of what the game can be like and the prices for most games is far too high now if there was a deal that you could say if you get the game for half price but you do like a survey on what you think but you would be monitored so you would really do it.

Multiplayer is what sells games these days, the most successful games I've noticed have usually had a good MP system. The problem is, you can't experience that with a demo (usually) or a pirated copy. So how are consumers supposed to know what they're buying into? Developers should do something like open up their MP for week-long demos. Otherwise you'll have people pirating the game, beating the single player campaign (because that's all they can access) and having no real incentive to go back and buy the real thing.

Case in point, MW2. I've heard both horror stories and praise about it. I want to give the MP a go, but I'm sure as hell not going to risk $100 on it. Give me a MP demo and you might have a sale. Don't give me a demo, I'll download it, finish the SP, have no replay value and in the end... still not have experienced the MP and be in the same situation as before. Lost potential sale.

When I say 'some people', below, Im certainly not on about me :pirate: Just so we clear that up.... :shifty:

Some people are just really too impatient to wait for games to be released, some people will download the latest offering just to play it and see what it's like. Most people that I know who download games, have loads of downloaded games but never play them, coz they dont actually mean anything - I have to say that someone very close to me (but definately not me) will usually pirate a game when it first comes out, if it's great then 'he' will buy it when it's come down in price, but 'he' never buys games when they first come out coz they are just far too expensive. 'He' does buy games when they have come down in price and 'he' always plays bought copies more than pirated copies.

Of course, piracy really cant be justified at all, whether you would buy it or not, or whether you are in a country or position where you think it's too expensive to buy and for some reason you think you deserve to play the games whether the company/store get your money are not, piracy is a crime, if you pirate games you are breaking the law, and if you get busted it's your own fault.

I'll be honest, I was one of the 4.1 Million. Here is why. I wanted to see how it would look graphically on my system and if there was a huge difference from the 360 version. Since there was no demo at the time so I could just see the graphics, I downloaded the full game. I checked it out, uninstalled it, and was on my merry way. I had no regret or remorse doing so, I guess that makes me an incredibly bad person by the responses in this thread.

Multiplayer is what sells games these days, the most successful games I've noticed have usually had a good MP system. The problem is, you can't experience that with a demo (usually) or a pirated copy. So how are consumers supposed to know what they're buying into? Developers should do something like open up their MP for week-long demos. Otherwise you'll have people pirating the game, beating the single player campaign (because that's all they can access) and having no real incentive to go back and buy the real thing.

Case in point, MW2. I've heard both horror stories and praise about it. I want to give the MP a go, but I'm sure as hell not going to risk $100 on it. Give me a MP demo and you might have a sale. Don't give me a demo, I'll download it, finish the SP, have no replay value and in the end... still not have experienced the MP and be in the same situation as before. Lost potential sale.

Bioshock, Fallout 3, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Mass Effect and Assassins Creed 1 & 2, just to name a few.

If you're happy with the demo you shouldn't need any more convincing, no matter how good/bad the multi-player is.

The incentive should be to buy the game based on what you thought of the demo.

"beating the single player campaign" - So what you're saying is that in general, developers only deserve your cash based on the multi-player experience?

"I'll download it, finish the SP, have no replay value and in the end" - That's basically what purchasing a game is all about... Remember the NES and SNES days, when you bought a game, finished it and maybe played it again a year later? I hate to break it to you but building a single player game costs money too.

If you're not happy with the demo that the developer/publisher provides then don't buy the game and walk away, you have no right to torrent it just because they didn't let you play multi-player.

I'll be honest, I was one of the 4.1 Million. Here is why. I wanted to see how it would look graphically on my system and if there was a huge difference from the 360 version. Since there was no demo at the time so I could just see the graphics, I downloaded the full game. I checked it out, uninstalled it, and was on my merry way. I had no regret or remorse doing so, I guess that makes me an incredibly bad person by the responses in this thread.

Yes it does.

Just as another aside from something from another comment, Im also a big Steam fan here, picked up a good few games over the sales this month that I wanted to play that I honestly hadnt obtained from elsewhere - cheaper prices and some form of digital distribution, or a central point online to buy and deliver games effectively is what's going to reduce piracy on the whole. People just want to play games, I just want to play games, find some way to deliver games cheaply and effectively and you've cracked it.

Ill admit I have pirated Games before but only for the reason to try before I buy... I really wish games released more demos so I could do that easier but if they don't released a demo I pirate then if I like I buy the full copy. I do the same with console I rent if I like then I buy the full copy....If they can find a way to "rent" on like steam or some sort I would rent then try..could also bring in a lil extra revenue....I just don't know how they would do this nor what I suggest a way to do so....just an idea

quick note I'm one of those people that if I like a game and play it alot I like to have all the boxart,manuals, ect. in a hard copy form....

It's a shame to see such high figures for the PC, I'm not surprised developers cut corners when adapting games for PC.

It used to be; develop for PC and shrink for consoles, now it's the other way around.

Steam FTW.

Stream is a miracle for release groups, it can be cracked easily and saves hours on the time needed to crack a game.

Stream is a miracle for release groups, it can be cracked easily and saves hours on the time needed to crack a game.

My point is that Steam offers pretty good prices on products and make them available immediately to you.

Saves a lot of effort on the buyers part.

We blaming Steam for piracy now?

I think the PC version of MW2 got pirated so much out of spite. No one wanted to give them money for a product that had the most enjoyable multiplayer feature stripped out of the PC version. While I didn't even play MW2, I don't blame the PC folks who pirated it.

im most worried about the people that know how to pirate and choose to download the Sims...

how do they determine these figures?

honestly, there was a time when i was so poor that i couldnt afford games at all.... i had to wait for my birthday or christmas. now that i have a real job and i can afford games, i STILL dont pay full price at the store for them (save for MW2... eesh... $65 after tax.) all i do is wait until the games are like $10. i have plenty of other games to occupy myself until the latest and greatest is much cheaper.

I think the PC version of MW2 got pirated so much out of spite. No one wanted to give them money for a product that had the most enjoyable multiplayer feature stripped out of the PC version. While I didn't even play MW2, I don't blame the PC folks who pirated it.

I'm sure Infinity Ward thought PC gamers would be fine without Dedicated Servers, they knew that latency issues wouldn't be a major problem which was the only reason for having dedicated servers in the past, however they probably perfected the means of P2P networking and made it similar to consoles.

And the response was, "Ohh sh*t, no dedicated servers for MW2... F*ck this I'll pirate it".

I won't be surprised if they don't even make a PC version next time with all the dedicated server b*llsh*t they got.

Maybe the word 'ungrateful' springs to mind.

(Reminds me of the StarCraft 2 LAN play incident).

Ill admit I have pirated Games before but only for the reason to try before I buy... I really wish games released more demos so I could do that easier but if they don't released a demo I pirate then if I like I buy the full copy. I do the same with console I rent if I like then I buy the full copy....If they can find a way to "rent" on like steam or some sort I would rent then try..could also bring in a lil extra revenue....I just don't know how they would do this nor what I suggest a way to do so....just an idea

quick note I'm one of those people that if I like a game and play it alot I like to have all the boxart,manuals, ect. in a hard copy form....

I may be getting a little off subject here but....

Since most games now focus on multi-player as their selling point and include a shorter, single-player mode (which only upsets those that like 'em and feel ripped off), why not come up with something like this:

A massive single-player campaign which takes place on-line, in a multi-user environment. Meaning, you play your mission, while seeing others play theirs but they cannot kill you. You each have separate goals yet your actions could effect each others (i.e., the other player might take out an enemy tank which I am tasked to destroy, but another tank appears after a limited time).

Both, multi and single player campaigns are online. Then, give everyone a limited time offer to demo it by restricted user accounts. If you pirate the game, you're only pirating the interface to the server, there'd be nothing to play.

... just an idea.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!