Most Pirated Games of 2009


Recommended Posts

I may be getting a little off subject here but....

Since most games now focus on multi-player as their selling point and include a shorter, single-player mode (which only upsets those that like 'em and feel ripped off), why not come up with something like this:

A massive single-player campaign which takes place on-line, in a multi-user environment. Meaning, you play your mission, while seeing others play theirs but they cannot kill you. You each have separate goals yet your actions could effect each others (i.e., the other player might take out an enemy tank which I am tasked to destroy, but another tank appears after a limited time).

Both, multi and single player campaigns are online. Then, give everyone a limited time offer to demo it by restricted user accounts. If you pirate the game, you're only pirating the interface to the server, there'd be nothing to play.

... just an idea.

... but people with no internet connection (or a crappy connection) would be stuck.

Ive an OK connection, but hate playing games with immature plebs, whether or not they had an affect on my gaming would be a moot point if I could still see them ghosting around when Im trying to get stuff done.

Just because people downloaded COD:MW2 didn't mean they downloaded it to play without paying.

I bought a russian key of the game and Steam automatically downloaded the russian version of the game so I had to download the english version via torrent and install it into Steam. Completely legit in the eye of steam but chumbersome (having to download english version and install english patches but really worth the money ($37 AU). Playing it right now on Veteran using the key I purchased.

So torrents DO have legit uses.

The Wii piracy surprised me though. I didn't realize there was any significant amount of piracy on that platform.

Homebrew :)

Also, these figures are only for torrent, can you imagine if they included P2Ps ( most people STILL use them) Like ares, shareaza and the likes, not to mention usenet

Also, these figures are only for torrent, can you imagine if they included P2Ps ( most people STILL use them) Like ares, shareaza and the likes, not to mention usenet

If they included Usenet and Rapidshare we'd see the 360 piracy numbers go skyward.

I'm sure Infinity Ward thought PC gamers would be fine without Dedicated Servers, they knew that latency issues wouldn't be a major problem which was the only reason for having dedicated servers in the past, however they probably perfected the means of P2P networking and made it similar to consoles.

Yuh huh which is why they went from: "Everything will be the same as before" in August then a month later they tell us it'll be a C&P of live? Christ they didn't even rename the exe from CoD4!

It's a rush job.

And now Activision has the justification they need in order to neglect PC development even further. Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but I can't shake the feeling that Activision and IW neutered the PC version of MW2 on purpose, in order to stir the people into a frenzy and get them to pirate the game out of anger. Now for all future Activision titles, whenever they're asked why there's no PC version, they can just point to MW2 and and the fact that it was pirated to hell.

The Wii piracy surprised me though. I didn't realize there was any significant amount of piracy on that platform.

But MW2 was the most pirated for the 360, too. They'd have to stop developing for consoles as well.

If they included Usenet and Rapidshare we'd see the 360 piracy numbers go skyward.

Yuh huh which is why they went from: "Everything will be the same as before" in August then a month later they tell us it'll be a C&P of live? Christ they didn't even rename the exe from CoD4!

It's a rush job.

And so would the PC numbers too, what's your point?

Personally I've never touched the PC version of MW2, but it seems like Infinity Ward saw the piracy coming and acted accordingly.

I would've done the same thing.

Why build a perfect product for it to be stolen by 4 million people.

However, the 360 reached the highest number of MW2 sales of all platforms and there in lies the major difference.

"According to the NPD Group, Modern Warfare 2 sold approximately 4.2 million units for the Xbox 360 and 1.87 million units for the PlayStation 3 in the U.S. during the month of November 2009." - Wikipedia

Enough said really, I'm not surprised the PC sales weren't mentioned.

And so would the PC numbers too, what's your point?

I'm sure the numbers we'd see would be much closer since pirates can go on live with a copy if they are careful. My 360 is modded and is yet to be banned. :)

Personally I've never touched the PC version of MW2, but it seems like Infinity Ward saw the piracy coming and acted accordingly.

See problem with that idea is this: Without a valid CD key for CoD4 you're locking your self out of most of the official servers. Severely limiting your experience with the multiplayer and forcing your self to play with cheats. But with MW2 people got around the P2P system in a matter of days and EVERYONE could play it. :)

I've seen a lot of this too.

However, the 360 reached the highest number of MW2 sales of all platforms and there in lies the major difference.

But if they left in dedicated servers who knows, maybe they could have netted another 500k+? That's another ?17mil. :/

Still it appears it was a choice between getting it out for Christmas or including dedicated servers & play testing the MP. The Christmas sales did em some good it appears.

Edited by Spookie
See problem with that idea is this: Without a valid CD key for CoD4 you're locking your self out of most of the official servers. Severely limiting your experience with the multiplayer and forcing your self to play with cheats. But with MW2 people got around the P2P system in a matter of days and EVERYONE could play it. :)

This is why I don't think that IWNet was a response to piracy. It's more likely a way to start pushing paid DLC. In any case it was one of the greatest cases of epic fail in recent gaming memory. Bad decisions cost in any sector and it's cost IW/Activision in PC sales. I know they lost me as a customer. I'd been counting down the months and weeks to the release date until they dropped the bombshell.

Some things are just not gonna work. Like a three-wheeler Lamborghini or a Prius with a Hummer engine. Or a PC FPS with no dedicated servers or moddable content in it's 4th release. They knew their client base, they knew what they had come to expect and they failed to deliver.

PC and Wii are just too easily broken down with minimal or no reprecussions it's as simple as that. It's like telling a drug dealer he can sell his drugs to as many people as he wants at this specific corner of the street - Yeah one day in a one in a million chance he might go, "oh what I'm doing is illegal", and stop, but 99% chance he'll carry on till he gets to the point it's justified in his head what he's doing is acceptable or excusable.

Hence the breeding of our entitlement generation.

Consoles are the future for the most varied source of gaming, PC gaming will always live on with it's pro's, mainly MMOs, but consoles are starting to hit onto that turf as well.

When I say 'some people', below, Im certainly not on about me :pirate: Just so we clear that up.... :shifty:

Some people are just really too impatient to wait for games to be released, some people will download the latest offering just to play it and see what it's like. Most people that I know who download games, have loads of downloaded games but never play them, coz they dont actually mean anything - I have to say that someone very close to me (but definately not me) will usually pirate a game when it first comes out, if it's great then 'he' will buy it when it's come down in price, but 'he' never buys games when they first come out coz they are just far too expensive. 'He' does buy games when they have come down in price and 'he' always plays bought copies more than pirated copies.

Of course, piracy really cant be justified at all, whether you would buy it or not, or whether you are in a country or position where you think it's too expensive to buy and for some reason you think you deserve to play the games whether the company/store get your money are not, piracy is a crime, if you pirate games you are breaking the law, and if you get busted it's your own fault.

I am pretty sure that the act of piracy in itself is a civil matter and not a criminal one (hence the fact that they can only fine pirates and not imprison them), it only becomes a criminal matter when you start to produce and distribute pirated content, if you just procure it for personal use then you can only be tried in a civil court.

Honestly, I pirate games for the pc. Why? Because I've been screwed too many times buying crappy games. Now I pirate it, if I like it, then I buy it, uninstall the pirated version, and install the proper one. The only reason I don't do this for xbox is because I don't want to be banned. I got screwed when I bought NFS: Shift. I should have just pirated the damn thing for pc, then I would have realised how crummy it was.

im most worried about the people that know how to pirate and choose to download the Sims...

It doesn't take much technical know how to pirate something. One person can burn the dvd with the game + crack and then pass it around to all their less technically inclined friends.

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Only if.

I'm willing to bet that if the only means of obtaining the game was to purchase it many of the people who pirated it would pony up the money. These are people who want the game. If they didn't want it they wouldn't have downloaded it. As such, each illegal download is actually a potential sale lost.

If one sees nothing wrong with piracy, and knows how to pirate, it is logical to pirate and not buy software as there is no advantage in buying something that you can get for free. Save $20 or spend $20? Save is the logical choice. It doesn't matter if this person makes a lot or a little - only an idiot would spend money on something free.

The figures don't mean much.

Someone downloading a game doesn't equal a lost sale if they were NEVER GOING TO BUY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

And actually there's a valid argument that piracy helps a company's sales. Someone might download a pirated version of a game, because at the time he doesn't have money. But by the time sequels of the game come out, he might have the money, and having played the game and liked it he might be willing to go to the store and buy them. People assume those who pirate are completely amoral and they're not, they just don't put a guilt trip on themselves for something they think is stupid. So a lot of people who pirate, when they have the money, and they like a game, they buy it.

In other cases, like with Microsoft, there's incentive to encourage piracy in countries like China because the more Windows is pirated the less people there will turn to operating systems like Linux.

I still think pirating software should be illegal, I just don't make people who do it into villains.

...? What? Your analogy has absolutely no relevance to what I was talking about. None. Further, it doesn't even parallel the situation at all. I really suggest you read my post again.

Yep you're right. When I re-read it I realised I'd missed some of the nuances. I thought you were implying that every download was a lost sale, not a potential lost sale. The joys of late night browsing...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!