• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2010


Definitive Best Defragmenter 2010  

590 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      60
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      0
    • Diskeeper
      59
    • JKDefrag
      32
    • Norton Speed Disk
      0
    • O&O Defrag
      50
    • PageDefrag
      0
    • Vopt
      3
    • Windows Defrag
      116
    • PerfectDisk
      143
    • Defraggler
      107
    • Other (please specify)
      20


Question

An updated "Best Defragmenter" poll for 2010. Please use this as a reference when researching Defrag utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Happy Voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/861054-definitive-best-defragmenter-2010/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've use PerfectDisk, O&O, Diskeeper, Defraggler and the one I like the best is Auslogics. Its very quick and light. It has a built in auto defrag feature, a option to turn off PC when completed, it also has a optimize and defrag option besides the defrag only option. It has variable color schemes and its FREE.

  • 0

i used o&o defrag for very long time, now however i want to use a freeware defragmenter, which of those supports boot-time defrag?

Puran Defrag supports boot time defrag. I've recently replaced Auslogics with this software; does everything Auslogics does + boot time defrag + uses layout.ini for its optimization.

  • 0

Because it runs in background when needed, skips huge files to avoid useless IO activity, keeps VSS, uses Low priority IO and has an awesome boot optimization:

http://www.msfn.org/board/speed-boot-process-under-windows-vista-windows-t140262.html

:whistle:

So, it's the best and free. You don't need a GUI to have a great tool ;)

  • 0

Because it runs in background when needed, skips huge files to avoid useless IO activity, keeps VSS, uses Low priority IO and has an awesome boot optimization:

http://www.msfn.org/board/speed-boot-process-under-windows-vista-windows-t140262.html

:whistle:

So, it's the best and free. You don't need a GUI to have a great tool ;)

All defrag tools I know do that plus more. About boot time, well, I restart my PC one time per month.
  • 0

All defrag tools I know do that plus more. About boot time, well, I restart my PC one time per month.

some defrag tools like perfectdisk will remove your restore points in windows 7(i don't like that as i myself like the restore points) but only if you do an ondemand defrag.

  • 0

What's wrong with windows defrag?

Nothing really. I find the UI too simplistic to be honest but it is quite good for the "average" user. I like how PerfectDisk defrags my disk every time the screen saver activates and does some defragging in the background.

PerfectDisk also uses a different method of organizing your files which differs from Diskeeper. For me, I find my system slighty more quicker and responsive than if I use Diskeeper. All my apps open at the click, no waiting :D

  • 0

Diskeeper 2010. Its the only true proactive solution, as the rest are reactive. No lag when starting apps and does as many disks as you connect to it at the same time.

You do realize that everyone who selected Windows Defrag has also selected a chopped down version of Diskeeper, right? ;)

  • 0

Wow! Shocked to see that Perfect Disk is not in the list.

The only real competition to PD seems to be from Diskkeeper. But, I am still not convinced. For now, PD has the best optimisation technique and it actually makes a perceivable difference.

Lets hope that the Defrag Guy finishes his tests son.

i used diskeeper for awhile before switching to PerfectDisk, I am now using PerfectDisk 11 and have noticed great improvement even over 10

  • 0

I've completely forgotten about defragmenting since Windows Vista. One less thing to manage. I can't be bothered to even think about installing a dedicated defragmenter, for some kind of psychological increase in performance.

Diskeeper 2010. Its the only true proactive solution, as the rest are reactive. No lag when starting apps and does as many disks as you connect to it at the same time.

These two are the opposites, and personally I prefer something in the middle. Those never defragmenting their HDD are the ones that has most to gain in performance by doing a defrag, as the HDD gets more fragmented over long use. It's correct that running defrag on a already almost tidy HDD gives basically nothing in performance. Never doing it isn't what I would choose though, I'd choose to do it very seldom. On the opposite end, I'd never use a pro-active defrag running as a background process, because it always puts a load (however minuscule) on your system with unnoticeable gains in performance. I'd rather have one less process running and do manual defrag now and then.

Also, I would never pay for a 3rd party defrag program, like Diskeeper or Perfectdisk. The free options are good enough according to me. The built-in windows defrag is ok, but slow and in Vista without progress display or any estimated time indicator (afaik they haven't updated it). A good 3rd party defrag program gives better visual cues, and a tad more options to play with, which is why I prefer to use them over the built-in defrag. In Windows 7, you should get an automatically scheduled defrag setup every week if you have a HDD. Personally, I turned it off, as I prefer to run it manually with longer time in between.

As for the choices on the list, Auslogics or Piriforms defrag programs are my current favourites.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!