Read Only Mode not working when two users open the same file


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am currently using a Windows Server 2003 as our shared drive. However, when two users open the same files, it doesn't shows the "read only" message.

Because generally, when two users open the same file, the second user who open it should receive a "Read Only" pop-up message, to avoid they overwrite the other person edit. But now this doesn't work. It allows both users open the file at the same time and save at the same time. THis cause a lot of problem as many files in our shared drive may edit by different users.

Anyone know how to solve this problem?

Thanks a lot for the help in advance.

If for whatever reason the share has permissions set to say the file permissions allow for changing - but the directory does not allow the creation of the temp file -- then you would not get the popup your talking about where it gives a user name

So for example.. Se here when I open this file from 2 different machines.

I get the popup - gave username of user that had file open.

post-14624-1262718971.jpg

But see the temp file created in the share.

post-14624-1262719062.jpg

If I change the permissions in such a way that the user can open/change the file - but does not have permissions to create that temp file.. When no temp file created in the dir -- then the second user to open the file would get a popup like this.

post-14624-1262721062.jpg

As to why you would not get any popup -- hmmm What are the permissions on the file in question exactly, and the directory for the 2 users in question. Are we sure the users are opening up the same file -- and not a local copy?? I have seen this a few times to be honest.

Had a user tell me they were making changes to a file -- but they were not saving.. Come to find out they were using a local copy of the file on their machine vs the network file, etc.

  BudMan said:
If for whatever reason the share has permissions set to say the file permissions allow for changing - but the directory does not allow the creation of the temp file -- then you would not get the popup your talking about where it gives a user name

Yes, that would be a reason. Bad setup if so, though.

  BudMan said:
Are we sure the users are opening up the same file -- and not a local copy?? I have seen this a few times to be honest.

Or the copy that was emailed to them...?

Im getting curious on the cause of this -- since even if the permissions were setup so they can not create the temp file in the directory the file is -- the user still gets a popup.. Just does not say which user - since the file is opened with a lock, etc.

But the user says they don't get a popup at all??

Have to wait for them to come back -- but since they only have 2 posts, we may never find out what the real issue was ;)

Firstly, Thanks a lot for all your help.

I am very sure both people open the same file in the shared drive. I have tested it many times, and the read only pop-up doesn't appear.

However, if two users open in a local NAS shared drive, it work perfectly. The read-only pop up immediately when two person open the same file. So I don't think is a client side problem, it should be related to the setting in the Windows Server 2003.

Based on my observation, it seems it doesn't create the temp file at all, is there any place in the Windows Server can particular blocked the temp file function??

THanks a lot for your help again.

Please post the permissions of the directory and the file in question. has the file been set as shared? is it an excel file? If so then 2nd user will not get popup

post-14624-1262895758.jpg

Hi all,

We have found this info:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/821464

In the KB article, it said the symptoms are:

- If multiple users try to access Microsoft Office documents on the server, the "File is locked for editing" message does not always appear when the second user opens the file.

- You receive an error message that is similar to one of the following messages when you try to connect to a shared resource:

System error 53. The network path was not found.

System error 64. The specified network name is no longer available.

We got both of the above problem, but this article is only apply to Windows Server 2000, however we are using Win 2003. Ahhhh..... is seems this is the cause, but is not apply to Win Sever 2003. >.<

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guilty is used as a regular English term here, not the legal term
    • AnyDesk 9.5.6 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just five megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.5.6 changelog: Features Implemented Discovery section in AnyDesk One Implemented multi-selection in Monitoring list views using Shift-Click Implemented URL handler for navigation Bugfixes Fixed crash when initialization of gles failed Fixed crash due to uncaught exceptions when registering internal services Fixed crash due to uncaught exceptions when registering internal services Fixed crash when adding device to favourites Fixed crash when starting Screen Recording Fixed bug that lead to showing incorrect Alerts in Monitoring when viewing specific devices Fixed bug that lead to interpreting right clicks as left clicks Fixed handling of double and triple clicks for middle and right mouse buttons Other changes Redesigned the authors' section in About AnyDesk panel Improved initialization of rendering components so that it is only done when needed Removed some false positive warning traces Download: AnyDesk 9.5.6 | macOS ~14.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • President Trump says TikTok deadline will ‘probably' be extended again by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar It appears that the Trump administration is quite keen on allowing TikTok to continue its operations in the U.S. The platform was briefly banned in the U.S. on January 19 for 14 hours. But as soon as Donald Trump assumed office as the 47th President of the U.S. on January 20, he signed an executive order to give a reprieve of 75 days to TikTok. During this period, TikTok had to separate itself from its Chinese parent, ByteDance, and find a U.S. buyer. Several U.S. companies, including Microsoft, Oracle, Perplexity AI, and Amazon, reportedly showed interest in buying the U.S. assets of TikTok. While President Trump hinted that a deal could soon come through, nothing materialised. As the 75-day deadline was about to expire on April 5, Trump signed another executive order on April 4, granting TikTok another 75-day extension. Now, with the second deadline nearing its end on June 19, it seems like President Trump is still unwilling to let TikTok shut down in the U.S. According to Reuters, U.S. President Trump has said that he would likely offer another extension to ByteDance-owned short video platform TikTok to divest its U.S. assets. Answering reporters on Air Force One on Tuesday, when asked about extending the deadline, Trump said; If announced, it will be for the third time, TikTok gets a lifeline to continue its operations in the U.S. While there is no clarity on how many extensions the company might receive, it's evident that President Trump wants TikTok to find a solution for its U.S. assets. Interestingly, he wanted to ban TikTok during his first Presidential term. However, things changed as Meta banned him from its platforms after the January 6, 2024, Capitol Attack. Trump then joined TikTok and appreciated the platform to help him reach a young audience. For now, TikTok's fate still hangs in the balance. Let us know in the comments below what you think about this development. Image by rafapress via Depositphotos
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Rhydderch earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Experienced
      dismuter went up a rank
      Experienced
    • One Month Later
      mevinyavin earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      rozermack875 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      oneworldtechnologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      698
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      272
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      214
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      186
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!