Would you upgrade to a 3D HDTV this year?


Recommended Posts

Well, I ain't gone HD yet, so when my current TV dies I will go HD. After that, who knows.

If you are using an old tube TV, don't expect to upgrade for another few years.. maybe more.

I would just bite the bullet and get a nice LED HDTV :D

I'm against.

It's what, ?50 for a pair of glasses? No thanks. The way I see it, TV manufacturers are running low on ideas. At CES, all TV manufacturers were either talking about 3D or internet and all this. I don't want my TV to boot up, and didn't they try the whole internet TV thing in the early 2000s? Besides, I've already got a set top box that I can use. All I want is a simple, thin HDTV that consumes a small amount of energy and has a great picture.

I saw Avatar in 3D. It was nice. Just nice. Like most other people in this thread, I want glasses-less 3DTV.

I'll wait until my current HDTV blows before I move to 3DTV. The effect is good in a movie theater because the screen is so large, you're IN the movie. But at home, unless you buy the biggest screen possible (and even that), you're never going to have the same effect. Having a tinny hammer thrown at me while watching My Bloody Valentine 3D at home will have much less impact... The feeling works well when it's life size.

And my eyes can only stand so much of 3D. My head start to hurt after max 2 hours. So, is it worth it for me? I don't think so.

Watching 3D movie is something cool that I do once in a while in a theater. But for home, I think it's a gimmick. Content will be available on Blu-Ray and I'm not sure but is it Direct TV that is planning on having 1 channel of 3D content when their new SAT is in the air....? I don't know, again, not enough content make 3D a no-go for a couple of years....

I agree. 3D TV is just not worth it. Does anyone know if you can disable or re-enable the 3D format? So lets say I want to watch a 3D movie but afterwords I want to watch normal TV in 2D. Can I do that?

Regardless, I won't buy such a thing. I hate 3D picture. You need glasses to really see it, something that I've never gotten used to, especially watching Spy Kids in 3D as a kid. You can still see the polarization within your glasses, just much less.

You'd have to have more money than sense to get one, this year at least.

a) I'm not putting on glasses to watch a film, let alone a TV series if that ever came out.

b) I'm happy with what I have.

c) It's just another fad.

d)

The way I see it, TV manufacturers are running low on ideas. At CES, all TV manufacturers were either talking about 3D or internet and all this. I don't want my TV to boot up, and didn't they try the whole internet TV thing in the early 2000s? Besides, I've already got a set top box that I can use. All I want is a simple, thin HDTV that consumes a small amount of energy and has a great picture.

What he said :p

No. If i really wanted to watch TV with over priced sun glasses on I sure as hell wouldn't spend thousands above and beyond standard for the experience. 3D has never taken off for a reason. It's a gimmick, still is, always will be.

It will never take off and make huge sales.

Most people realize they do things besides sit and stare at a t.v. Meaning, while the set is on, you're cooking, cleaning, doing paperwork, etc.

If the glasses are needed, no one is going to sit there and constantly put them on and take them off. Not to mention if there's something happening on the screen and you turn to see it (e.g., a news flash), you completely missed it unless the glasses are in immediate vicinity.

I'm wary of dismissing a new technology as a fad - plenty of people have infamously dismissed technologies which have gone on to be 'essentials' for most people (such as the television itself, etc) - but I just don't know of anyone who's interested in one of these. I'd have to try it out to see how 'amazing' it was but I'm not bothered enough at this point to hunt down a TV and try it!

No, just no.

Unless there's a 200"+ 3D screen available, it won't work. Geez, even in the theater (not IMAX) I was a little bothered that sometimes the experience wasn't so immersive anymore because I noticed the screen edges since it didn't fill my entire peripheral vision. IMAX though, is a totally different story.. HOLY **** :o

I'm still reading your replies and noticed the majority of you guys are against.

I've even asked the show floor guys here at CES2010 if they see a market for this and keep telling me yes with a smile.

Someone didn't do their research.

I think Sharp will do well this year.

If you are using an old tube TV, don't expect to upgrade for another few years.. maybe more.

I would just bite the bullet and get a nice LED HDTV :D

Yes, I have a Beko CRT TV. It's about 8 years old and going good so far.

If I had any spare cash, maybe I would get anew TV, but all our money goes on bills/debts and essentials.

I'm with just about everyone else in this thread. TBH, HD didn't improve my enjoyment of movies that much. A good movie was still good, and a crap movie was still crap. Although I do enjoy HD, 3D is just a side show gimmick as far as I'm concerned. It works in one-off movies here and there, but I'm not going to invest in equipment to bring it to my living room (maybe if it matures to something beyond plastic glasses).

mmmmm 3D boobies

On second thought...

I'm still reading your replies and noticed the majority of you guys are against.

I've even asked the show floor guys here at CES2010 if they see a market for this and keep telling me yes with a smile.

Someone didn't do their research.

I think Sharp will do well this year.

I bet the floor guy is either in sales or marketing. Do you really expect him to answer "no, we really don't expect his to sell big"? He's got one job to do - promote his product to get the reporters (including you) to talk about the product, raise awareness and hype....which hopefully result in sales.

Have him explain how well the tv looks when you walk in the house carrying two bags of groceries and something like 9/11 is on the tv. Is your product a convenience or a deterrent to the customer if they can't see it without special glasses?

They obviously didn't think this product out from the viewers' everyday actions around a tv. Not everyone sits and stares like a zombie.

I bet the floor guy is either in sales or marketing. Do you really expect him to answer "no, we really don't expect his to sell big"? He's got one job to do - promote his product to get the reporters (including you) to talk about the product, raise awareness and hype....which hopefully result in sales.

Have him explain how well the tv looks when you walk in the house carrying two bags of groceries and something like 9/11 is on the tv. Is your product a convenience or a deterrent to the customer if they can't see it without special glasses?

They obviously didn't think this product out from the viewers' everyday actions around a tv. Not everyone sits and stares like a zombie.

It was more so his speech about it and the way he acted.. I've seen some other people here who I can tell don't truely believe in their product, but this one guy was so hyped up and over excited, he definitely believed there IS a market for 3DTV, and people will be snatching them up like crazy.

I think Sharp will do well this year.

I like the sound of Sharp's direction, but I'm not sure I understand the whole "making up a new pixel" thing. Where does it get information about the yellow pixel?

Also bear in mind that most people are idiots. If Sharp don't have a decent marketing team pushing their new stuff they won't get anywhere. People don't do research.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp slams Isreali firm, NSO Group, for trying to spy on its users by David Uzondu WhatsApp has come out accusing Israeli cyber-intelligence firm, NSO Group, of deploying a fresh wave of highly targeted "spear phishing" attacks against users, which its security teams successfully thwarted. The Israeli firm, according to WhatsApp, ran this operation like its usual one-click phishing campaigns, trying to get people to click malicious links that lead them to external sites. To coordinate the campaign, the spyware vendor created fake test accounts and groups on the messaging app. WhatsApp said it is sharing the specific malicious domains, ikhwancast[.]com, ghazacast[.]com, and fr24cast[.]com, because potential victims need this data to check if they were targeted across other messaging systems or email platforms. The NSO Group is infamous for creating and selling Pegasus, a military-grade commercial spyware capable of silently compromising smartphones simply by sending a message or placing a missed call via apps like WhatsApp or iMessage. Users do not even have to interact with the incoming notification before the infection takes hold. Once Pegasus manages to break in, the spyware harvests private data, letting operators read private messages, emails, photos, and documents. It also tracks precise GPS locations, records keystrokes, activates the device's camera, and monitors live microphone audio. Independent investigations by cybersecurity watchdogs like The Citizen Lab and human rights organizations like Amnesty International have proven that governments use this software to track humanitarian workers, journalists, diplomats, and political dissidents. These findings directly contradict NSO Group claims that clients use the technology to spy on criminals and terrorists only. In late 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce added the firm to its Entity List, effectively banning the vendor from buying hardware and software from American tech companies. WhatsApp said in its blog post that the spyware vendor violated a permanent court injunction with this new spear-phishing campaign. This injunction, which took effect in 2025, strictly prohibited NSO Group from targeting WhatsApp and its users. The platform is now asking a federal court to hold the firm in contempt.
    • It would be surprising if even 3 year old Apple Watches (and not SE models at that) cannot run watchOS 27. Granted, it doesn't mean it would work as well. We'll see.
    • Apple launches new website for parents and a revamped Screen Time experience by Aditya Tiwari At WWDC 2026, Apple announced new parental control features for iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27 to keep kids' device usage in check and keep them safe online. As a parent, you'll get access to a simpler setup experience, Ask to Browse, Time Allowances, and a redesigned Screen Time. You'll be able to pick exactly which apps your child can access on their device, choosing from just a few essential apps, a curated set, or the apps you feel are appropriate. There will be an option to gradually add more apps. Ask to Browse is a new feature that requires kids to request permission before visiting a new website in Safari on iPhone, iPad, or Mac. You can also turn on a setting that requires your kid to ask for approval before connecting with an unknown contact via Messages, FaceTime, or the Phone app. You can manage your child's screen time more effectively with Time Allowances that work across categories, including Games, Entertainment, and Social Media. You can set time limits based on your kid's age and get suggestions informed by expert research. Speaking of expert guidance, Apple added that it's working with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to adapt its Family Media Plan to create a guide parents can refer to when using Apple products. Moreover, the company has also set up a new dedicated website, where you can find tools, resources, and answers to common questions around parental controls and child safety. Apple also allows parents to set daily schedules to manage screen time, configuring access to different apps at different times of the day and across the week. Overall, the Screen Time section has been revamped and provides a bird's-eye view of your kid's average device usage and most-used apps. "For example, to help protect important family moments, parents can quickly limit access during meals, outdoor play, and other times that deserve full attention. If kids need a little extra time to finish something in an app, parents can also easily extend access," Apple said. Apart from these, Communication Safety has been updated to block gore or violent content when detected in shared images or videos. The feature already blurs nudity in Messages and FaceTime calls, and is enabled by default for users under 18.
    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus? It really feels like someone screwed up, and that advanced AI features will only be available on the list above but someone screwed up and said that Watch OS 27 in general will only be available for those models. I think they will pull it back. I did see someone also put a snap shot of their series 9 watch being offered the watch os 27 beta. As the backlash online is already in full swing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!