NBC to Conan O'Brien - The Choice Is Yours


Recommended Posts

the Tonight show died for me after conans arrival

hes not funny, his guests are, i cant laugh at what he says,just at how weird he acts and looks

Ive never understood why hes funny, but i think this thread proves everyone has diff tastes

Glad to see i can get my Jay fix again

the Tonight show died for me after conans arrival

hes not funny, his guests are, i cant laugh at what he says,just at how weird he acts and looks

Ive never understood why hes funny, but i think this thread proves everyone has diff tastes

Glad to see i can get my Jay fix again

You have no idea what are you talking about.

Connan is way better than any of the late night hosts, although ... since he's been moved to Jay's time he hasn't been the same. His jokes are mellowed down trying to fit the younger crowed too.... I wish they return him back to his old time schedule. He kicked ass there.

The future of NBC?s late-night plans may wind up in Conan O?Brien?s hands.

One day after NBC executives said privately that they were contemplating a plan to move Jay Leno back to 11:35 p.m., representatives of Mr O?Brien made it clear the comedian has not accepted NBC?s plan and was likely not to agree any time in the near future.

At the same time a new possibility may be emerging for Mr. O?Brien ? at a rival network. The Fox network apparently wants Mr. O?Brien ? and the public ? to know that it thinks very highly of the late-night star.

?We?ve always been interested in late night and we?re always looking to bring great new talent to Fox. While Conan would be a great fit for Fox, he?s still under contract with NBC, so we?ll just see how all of this plays out,? said a Fox employee who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record about the issue.

Several news organizations published similar comments Friday afternoon.

And one Fox executive amplified by saying a late-night show has always been at least loosely on the network?s agenda. ?We love Conan,? the executive said.

Mr. Leno has already made an oblique reference to the possibility of an opening at Fox. On Thursday night, Mr. Leno joked in his monologue: ?If we did get canceled, it will give us time to do some traveling. I understand that Fox is beautiful this time of year.?

Unlike Mr. Leno, Mr. O?Brien made no jokes Thursday night about the public speculation about both men?s late-night careers.

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010...fox/#more-23231

The LATimes has an interesting piece today chronicling the rise and fall of TV executive Jeff Zucker. Just over half a year ago, Zucker’s decision to move Leno into the 10 p.m. slot on NBC was widely regarded as one of the biggest TV bets we’d ever seen. But while Leno might have technically been profitable, NBC clearly failed to take into account their entire TV ecosystem, as Leno completely decimated the ratings of local affiliates. In fact, my local NBC affiliate, WHDH in Boston, almost refused to air Leno outright, but was eventually cowed into submission. Unfortunately, it now looks like they would have been better off striking out on their own.

With rumors that NBC’s entire prime time lineup will be reshuffled, the cost of the entire Leno debacle might end up being quite high. According to the LATimes, “Some veteran TV executives believe the Leno imbroglio could ultimately cost more than $200 million, including the damage inflicted on stations’ local newscasts, their ad rates and NBC programs, such as ‘Law & Order: Special Victims Unit,’ which lost millions of viewers when its time period was changed. They predicted that it could take years for NBC to rebuild.” (emphasis added) Consider the $200 million number a back-of-the-envelope guess, but I don’t have any problem believing that this whole experiment has been nothing short of a financial disaster.

Slash Film

All this hubbub is helping Conan with the ratings.

Late Night: Conan Crushes Dave on Friday Night

Posted on 09 January 2010 by Robert Seidman

While all the noise about Jay Leno moving back to 11:30 hasn?t done anything for The Jay Leno Show?s 10pm ratings, perhaps the noise about whether Conan will stay or go has helped with The Tonight Show at 11:30. Last night Conan crushed Letterman in adults 18-49 (1.2/4 rating/share vs. 0.8/3) in Nielsen?s 25 local markets with People Meters.

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/01/09/late-...day-night/38218

im happy about this if only one thing happens: conan moves to Fox.

Why? Fox fits in more with Conan's humor, and he can be himself, and even better than before.

His humor mixes in well with family guy, simpsons, and other shows that fox does. it'll be awesome.

I really started to lose interest in NBC when the talks of comcast buyin them started. Now they're just turning to ****. used to be my fav network :(

but yea, conan would be nice on fox. :D

so in other words, its immature

Wow that's pretty bad. No wonder Vivendi dumped NBC.

Vivendi dumped its 20% take in order for NBC Universal to take full control to help finalize a sale to Comcast. not because NBC is doing poorly.

http://www.silobreaker.com/vivendi-dumps-2...784967786364952

Conan's obviously quite keen on leaving NBC. Just look at the end of that clip: "whoever crawls out alive gets to leave NBC - that's an appealing proposition" - I think he's gone.

Relax, he's poking fun. Jay's done millions of jokes about NBC as well.

Apparently NBC is holding a conference right now and they've already announced their plans for the late night lineup.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/w...article1425456/

AndrewRyan:

Correction: The Tonight Show will run one hour, from 12:05 to 1:05, when Jimmy Fallon takes over. That means Conan gets the half-hour at 11:30.. But Jay gets the mantle of The Tonight Show

...

AndrewRyan:

Gaspin just said Conan will take Toe Tonight Show title, so apologies for earlier confusion. The headline is Leno's 10 p.m. show is gone, and that he's moving back to 11:35 p.m.

...

AndrewRyan:

Yes, that is the plan. Gaspin clarified the fact that Leno is their 11:30 man. Again, he keeps saying this all has to be worked out with the talent.

They also talked about the primetime lineup but I don't think the blogger posted much about it. This is all I saw.

AndrewRyan:

Gaspin hinted that a new drama from David E. Kelley will help fill the void, and mentioned they have Law & Order: Criminal Intent in the wings. Obviously this is still being determined.

AndrewRyan:

They were just asked about Southland, and said that the show underperformed in ratings.

Edited by Rob2687
Let me get this straight: They want to compress Leno's show down to a half-hour, and move it later, which means pushing O'Brien's show back by a half-hour as well.

Has it occured to NBC that they don't have to keep him on the air at all?

They want him on their network instead of another. That is why Leno got the 10pm slot in the first place.

Apparently NBC is holding a conference right now and they've already announced their plans for the late night lineup.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/w...article1425456/

They also talked about the primetime lineup but I don't think the blogger posted much about it. This is all I saw.

That first set of quotations makes absolutely no sense at all to me.

TMZ posted some as well!

NBC has just confirmed the TMZ story that Jay Leno's 10 PM show is going off the air next month when the Olympics begin.

And as we also reported, after the Olympics, Leno will take over Conan O'Brien's time slot -- at least for the first half hour.

NBC chairman Jeff Gaspin added that he wants to push Conan and Jimmy Fallon back an hour so things will go back to the way they were -- with Jay controlling 11:35 to 12:35 .... but that's not a done deal.

Gaspin claimed that he's already met with both Conan and Fallon to discuss the changes -- and shockingly, they weren't ****ed.

Gaspin says both men were professional and understanding.

Well, you can't please everybody.

While the industry basked in a smug "we told you so" glow Sunday at the prospect of the broadcast universe returning to its normal rotational orbit, there were some TV fans were none-too-pleased about NBC's plan to relocate late-night-type shows back to late night.

"I swear if they move Conan to midnight I'll be so ****ed," groused Jgopp on Digg.com "It was horrible when he was on so late. I usually just stay up late enough to watch Conan do his opening and then fall asleep. I cannot believe NBC, they cannot make up their mind about anything and it drives me insane."

"The network is 100%+ doing the WRONG thing(s)," wrote Nunya Biz on The Live Feed. "Leno shorter? NO! Later? NO! 1/2 hour!? DEFINITELY NOT!"

And on EW.com: "Guess I?m in the minority who liked having Leno at 10 so that I could get to bed at a decent hour," wrote Jim. "And it did actually get me to watch some of the local news at 11:00 ? something I never did before. Oh well. I?ll not stay up."

Must be said that these comments were pretty rare on message boards. Most viewers said variations on the same things industry pundits have been saying.

"According to NBC, the show 'was performing at acceptable levels for the network' but 'did not meet our affiliates' needs,'" wrote TallGuyWithGlassesOn on Fark.com. "If that's not an admission of incompetence, I'm not sure what it is."

THR

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!