Recommended Posts

I have a problem with a customer who's database has twice dismounted due to the database exceeding 18+GB. This of course can be increased to 72GB+ with the addition of a registry key. I have added this key but the logs still show the same error when I start the Exchange Information Store.

Event Type: Information

Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store

Event Category: General

Event ID: 1216

Date: 09/01/2010

Time: 11:22:56

User: N/A

Computer: *********

Description:

The Exchange store 'First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (*********)' is limited to 18 GB. The current physical size of this database (the .edb file and the .stm file) is <1 GB. If the physical size of this database minus its logical free space exceeds the limit of 18 GB, the database will be dismounted on a regular basis.

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.

If I delete the key and re-add it then restart the services it then shows the correct 72GB in the event logs. Overtime though it will resort back to 18GB. Ideas? :(

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/864748-exchange-server-2003-sp2/
Share on other sites

few hours for that small of a database. I did one recently to a completely screwed exchange server 49GB took 8 hrs, repair first then defrag, defrag is optional but I would recommend it.

Either that or build another exchange server on hardware that you may or may not have. As I told them, its either you live without exchange until the process is done or we continue to have errors and issues until you get new hardware to put a new install on, they decided on the cheap way.

Edited by sc302

Had the same problem once with a client, i did warn them a month before hand that the server was getting full but they ignored me until the server crashed.

I had to defrag the database to get it to run again, make sure you have lots of free space, due to the server i had to perform the defrag to an external USB2 HDD as i couldn't get another IDE / SCSI connection, the server was physically full.

Once defraged depending on your version of exchange you should then be able to create another database and move some users to that.

As others have mentioned a hell of a lot of patience is required.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!