129 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructors Cup?

    • McLaren
      48
    • Mercedes GP
      11
    • Red Bull
      29
    • Ferrari
      36
    • Williams
      1
    • Renault
      2
    • Force India
      1
    • Toro Rosso
      0
    • Lotus
      1
    • Campos
      0
    • US
      0
    • Virgin
      0
  2. 2. Who will be the world champion this year?

    • Jenson Button
      11
    • Lewis Hamilton
      33
    • Michael Schumacher
      13
    • Nico Rosberg
      1
    • Sebastian Vettel
      10
    • Mark Webber
      21
    • Felipe Massa
      8
    • Fernando Alonso
      26
    • Rubens Barrichello
      1
    • Nico Hulkenberg
      0
    • Robert Kubica
      3
    • Vitaly Petrov
      2
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Vitantonio Liuzzi
      0
    • Sebastien Buemi
      0
    • Jaime Alguersuari
      0
    • Jarno Trulli
      0
    • Heikki Kovalainen
      0
    • Bruno Senna
      0
    • Jose Maria Lopez
      0
  3. 3. Who will be the world champion this year? Continued

    • Timo Glock
      2
    • Lucas di Grassi
      2
    • VOID VOTE (Because of Neowin's restrictions, select this if you choose not to select the above two drivers
      125


Recommended Posts

So should Hamilton be stripped the title bcoz Heikki let him past in 08 at the same track? Get over it seriously...

Yep, we all clearly heard Ron Dennis getting on the radio saying "Heikki... Lewis is faster than you. Please confirm that you understood that message"

There is no evidence that McLaren used team orders in '08, no incriminating radio traffic. You can only punish someone if you have evidence of wrongdoing.

Yep, we all clearly heard Ron Dennis getting on the radio saying "Heikki... Lewis is faster than you. Please confirm that you understood that message"

There is no evidence that McLaren used team orders in '08, no incriminating radio traffic. You can only punish someone if you have evidence of wrongdoing.

The "evidence" is that Heikki, a racing driver, moved out of the way and let his team mate pass him. We can all agree that no racing driver would do that if the team didn't instruct him to one way or another. The public also does not receive the same information that the stewards do. Let's not be naive. But in either case there was no clear instruction of team orders, you can read into it all you like but the "evidence" is not there, which is why the WMSC made the right decision and the FIA will be reviewing the regulation.

The "evidence" is that Heikki, a racing driver, moved out of the way and let his team mate pass him. We can all agree that no racing driver would do that if the team didn't instruct him to one way or another. The public also does not receive the same information that the stewards do. Let's not be naive. But in either case there was no clear instruction of team orders, you can read into it all you like but the "evidence" is not there, which is why the WMSC made the right decision and the FIA will be reviewing the regulation.

That didn't actually happen at the Italian GP in 2008 come to think of it, Heikki finished 2nd, Lewis 7th. If you are referring to Silverstone or Hockenheim.. Well I will concede that you have a point with Hockenheim, it did look contrived but with Silverstone, Lewis was about 2s a lap faster than Heikki at that point, he probably pulled that pass by himself. Still, as I said, McLaren implemented it all quietly, Ferrari hung themselves in public, AND lied to the fans and media about it after. Whatever way you look at it, they screwed up badly.

Another factor to keep in mind for tomorrow: A lap of Monza == 70% full throttle. A lot of drivers have engines which are close to EOL.

There shall be fireworks in the last 3rd of the race.

Another factor to keep in mind for tomorrow: A lap of Monza == 70% full throttle. A lot of drivers have engines which are close to EOL.

There shall be fireworks in the last 3rd of the race.

Yeah I thought about that too. Legard mentioned that Ferrari have used 8/8 engines (or is it 8 per driver)? Either way, it could wreck his title chances if one fails.

What a disappointing result for Lewis. Hopefully he will improve tomorrow.

Yeah I thought about that too. Legard mentioned that Ferrari have used 8/8 engines (or is it 8 per driver)? Either way, it could wreck his title chances if one fails.

nah, that rule is stupid, they will pay 100 grand instead... :)

What a disappointing result for Lewis. Hopefully he will improve tomorrow.

nah, that rule is stupid, they will pay 100 grand instead... :)

100 grand for what? They get a 10 place grid penalty if they use a 9th engine, and a further 10 place penalty for any further engine after that.

100 grand for what? They get a 10 place grid penalty if they use a 9th engine, and a further 10 place penalty for any further engine after that.

It's called a joke, you know because Ferrari break the rules and only ever pay a pathetic fine. :p

I don't forsee the engine issue being a problem, as all but 3 drivers are using brand new engines for this grand prix, however, particularly for Ferrari and Red Bull, it could become an issue as the season draws to a close. McLaren have the edge on the engine front IMO

What kind of start was that? Alonso seemed to be asleep, the chaos in the first chicane was not as bad as I expected it to be, and Hamilton's move on Alonso was.... over-optimistic.

Decent race. Congratulations to Alonso - he clearly was the fastest on track today.

RBR's strategy gamble with Vettel paid off in the end, keeping his title chances intact.

This weekend's Reject of the Race: Lewis Hamilton. You just don't throw away like that.

Lastly: I thought we'd see more mechanical failures than we did.

Decent enough race, Hamilton threw away his chance to get a margin in the championship. Alonso kept his nose clean enough after the encounter with button, I wouldn't put it all down to that incident the strategy Ferrari side was better. Hulkenberg on the other hand, 3 corner cuts defending a line.. I'm shocked that wasn't investigated.

PROVISIONAL RACE RESULTS

The Italian Grand Prix
Autodromo di Monza, Italy;
53 laps; 306.720km;
Weather: Sunny.

Classified:

Pos  Driver        Team                       Time
 1.  Alonso        Ferrari                    1h16:24.572
 2.  Button        McLaren-Mercedes           +     2.938
 3.  Massa         Ferrari                    +     4.223
 4.  Vettel        Red Bull-Renault           +    28.193
 5.  Rosberg       Mercedes                   +    29.942
 6.  Webber        Red Bull-Renault           +    31.276
 7.  Hulkenberg    Williams-Cosworth          +    32.812
 8.  Kubica        Renault                    +    34.028
 9.  Schumacher    Mercedes                   +    44.948
10.  Barrichello   Williams-Cosworth          +  1:04.200
11.  Buemi         Toro Rosso-Ferrari         +   1:05.00
12.  Liuzzi        Force India-Mercedes       +  1:06.100
13.  Petrov        Renault                    +  1:18.900
14.  De la Rosa    Sauber-Ferrari             +     1 lap
15.  Alguersuari   Toro Rosso-Ferrari         +     1 lap
16.  Sutil         Force India-Mercedes       +     1 lap
17.  Glock         Virgin-Cosworth            +    2 laps
18.  Kovalainen    Lotus-Cosworth             +    2 laps
19.  Di Grassi     Virgin-Cosworth            +    2 laps
20.  Yamamoto      HRT-Cosworth               +    2 laps

Fastest lap: Alonso, 1:24.139

Not classified/retirements:

Driver        Team                         On lap
Trulli        Lotus-Cosworth               47
Senna         HRT-Cosworth                 12
Hamilton      McLaren-Mercedes             1
Kobayashi     Sauber-Ferrari               1


World Championship standings, round 14:                

Drivers:                    Constructors:             
 1.  Webber       187        1.  Red Bull-Renault          350
 2.  Hamilton     182        2.  McLaren-Mercedes          347
 3.  Alonso       166        3.  Ferrari                   290
 4.  Button       165        4.  Mercedes                  158
 5.  Vettel       163        5.  Renault                   127
 6.  Massa        124        6.  Force India-Mercedes       58
 7.  Rosberg      112        7.  Williams-Cosworth          47
 8.  Kubica       108        8.  Sauber-Ferrari             27
 9.  Schumacher    46        9.  Toro Rosso-Ferrari         10
10.  Sutil         45       
11.  Barrichello   31       
12.  Kobayashi     21       
13.  Petrov        19       
14.  Hulkenberg    16       
15.  Liuzzi        13       
16.  Buemi          7       
17.  De la Rosa     6       
18.  Alguersuari    3    

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      258
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!