Optimize XP - A Windows XP Optimization Guide


Recommended Posts

Nice guide, I even got two new tweaks from there. I have a question about one, the SystemPages - what does it do, why should I set it the smallest size possible when benchmarks were bigger with the 0xffffffff value wich is quite a number in decimals and what was it all about Radeon owners?

  Quote
It's a good Guide, but you really don't need Cacheman with 2000/XP

Cacheman optimizes quite a few settings in Window 2000/XP:

1. Disk Cache

Windows NT4/2000/XP has a much better Disk Cache handling as Windows 95-ME. Windows NT4/2000/XP uses certain criteria to decide how to prioritize memory usage between the Disk Cache and applications. This dynamic allocation process is a continual juggling act. Four configuration presets are available.

- Minimize memory used

This setting minimizes the amount of memory used for the Disk Cache in order to maximize the amount of memory available for applications. This is the default setting for Windows NT Workstation and Windows 2000 Professional.

- Balance

This setting instructs Windows to give the Disk Cache and applications the same priority.

- Maximize throughput for file sharing

The Disk Cache gets a higher priority with this preset. It should be the best for file servers and workstations with very high I/O activity.

- Maximize throughput for network applications

This setting instructs Windows to give applications higher priority. It should be the best preset for application servers.

2. Icon Cache

Every executable file has an icon associated with it. Every time the shell displays a folder full of files it needs to obtain icons for each of those items. By saving icons that it has already retrieved into a cache, the shell is relieved of the need to constantly retrieve icons from executable files and icon libraries. This can make a vast difference to system performance, especially when accessing network drives.

After changing this setting you need to reboot at least 2 times until it becomes effective, but since it's not a critical setting Cacheman will not ask you on exit to reboot.

3. IO Page Lock Limit

If your system is very IO intensive you can increase the amount of memory that can be locked for IO operations when data is read from or written to the hard disks. When this value is 0, the system uses the default (512 Kbytes). Raising this value can give you a significant performance boost.

4. Disable NTFS last access update

By enabling this option, NT Filesystem will not record the last time a file was accessed. This can speed up disk operations if applications write many small files very frequently.

5. Hung App Timeout

Windows waits by default a long time to finally acknowledge that a particular program is "Not responding", and only after that allowing you to shut it down by clicking the End Task button.

6. Wait to Kill App Timeout

This value sets the timeout until Windows shuts down/restarts, while trying to exit all open programs.

7. Disable executive paging

Parts of system code and device drivers can be swapped out to paging file when the system needs more RAM. The system slows down when it needs that code or drivers since it must load them from the paging file. Windows stops while the required code is swapped in or out of RAM dependent on very long hard drive access times. If you have more than sufficient RAM, disabling Executive paging should improve performance.

8. Unload DLLs from memory

Windows automatically unloads DLLs when the usage count is zero, but only after the DLLs have not been used for a period of time. This inactive period might be unacceptably long at times and cause performance slow downs on low memory systems. Enable this option to disable Windows holding the DLLs in memory.

All of which help improve Windows XP performance. ;)

The problem with alot of the tweaks I see posted are comments like

"I don't know if this does anything"

"Seems to be faster now" ect.....

These same tweaks work their way into all-in-one tweaking programs and you wind up with situations like this: Dead Win XP after installation XP Smoker

  Mastertech said:
Cacheman optimizes quite a few settings in Window 2000/XP:

1. Disk Cache

Windows NT4/2000/XP has a much better Disk Cache handling as Windows 95-ME. Windows NT4/2000/XP uses certain criteria to decide how to prioritize memory usage between the Disk Cache and applications. This dynamic allocation process is a continual juggling act. Four configuration presets are available.

- Minimize memory used

This setting minimizes the amount of memory used for the Disk Cache in order to maximize the amount of memory available for applications. This is the default setting for Windows NT Workstation and Windows 2000 Professional.

- Balance

This setting instructs Windows to give the Disk Cache and applications the same priority.

- Maximize throughput for file sharing

The Disk Cache gets a higher priority with this preset. It should be the best for file servers and workstations with very high I/O activity.

- Maximize throughput for network applications

This setting instructs Windows to give applications higher priority. It should be the best preset for application servers.

2. Icon Cache

Every executable file has an icon associated with it. Every time the shell displays a folder full of files it needs to obtain icons for each of those items. By saving icons that it has already retrieved into a cache, the shell is relieved of the need to constantly retrieve icons from executable files and icon libraries. This can make a vast difference to system performance, especially when accessing network drives.

After changing this setting you need to reboot at least 2 times until it becomes effective, but since it's not a critical setting Cacheman will not ask you on exit to reboot.

3. IO Page Lock Limit

If your system is very IO intensive you can increase the amount of memory that can be locked for IO operations when data is read from or written to the hard disks. When this value is 0, the system uses the default (512 Kbytes). Raising this value can give you a significant performance boost.

4. Disable NTFS last access update

By enabling this option, NT Filesystem will not record the last time a file was accessed. This can speed up disk operations if applications write many small files very frequently.

5. Hung App Timeout

Windows waits by default a long time to finally acknowledge that a particular program is "Not responding", and only after that allowing you to shut it down by clicking the End Task button.

6. Wait to Kill App Timeout

This value sets the timeout until Windows shuts down/restarts, while trying to exit all open programs.

7. Disable executive paging

Parts of system code and device drivers can be swapped out to paging file when the system needs more RAM. The system slows down when it needs that code or drivers since it must load them from the paging file. Windows stops while the required code is swapped in or out of RAM dependent on very long hard drive access times. If you have more than sufficient RAM, disabling Executive paging should improve performance.

8. Unload DLLs from memory

Windows automatically unloads DLLs when the usage count is zero, but only after the DLLs have not been used for a period of time. This inactive period might be unacceptably long at times and cause performance slow downs on low memory systems. Enable this option to disable Windows holding the DLLs in memory.

All of which help improve Windows XP performance.  ;)

Eh, most of those things can be done in regedit if you really want them and IO Page Lock Limit does nothing. The only that might be useful is the Icon cache, but if you want that you could always go LargeSystemCache-1. now I used the program when I was under 98 and loved it, but I really believe you do not need it for XP no matter what they say.

  Quote
Eh, most of those things can be done in regedit if you really want them
LOL, just about any tweak utilities settings can be done manually. The whole point of including the utility is so you don't have to. Editing the registry manually is a bad practive since the registry has no native undo feature and changes are instantaneous. Not to mention it is alot easier and faster to use a utility. I like to keep things as simple as possible.
  Quote
and IO Page Lock Limit does nothing.

This is not true. But how much performance you will gain off of this value is based on what you use your system for and how much memory your system has.

  Quote
but I really believe you do not need it for XP no matter what they say.

Well I've installed this and configure it on over 1000 PCs with XP by now and it has improved performance. If you really feel so strongly against not using this program, you have every right not to. But the tweaks it includes will boost your system performance and I am not about to make it more complicated for people to use these tweaks by including them manually when a simple free utilitly can do it for you.

After some more research:

IO Page Lock Limit:

You will only notice performance differences with server or database applications (e.g. MS SQL Server). There are no negative effects for a large value, even if most applications will not profit from an increase, there is no reason for keeping the value low.

So at worst the value is harmless.

  Mastertech said:
After some more research:

IO Page Lock Limit:

You will only notice performance differences with server or database applications (e.g. MS SQL Server). There are no negative effects for a large value, even if most applications will not profit from an increase, there is no reason for keeping the value low.

So at worst the value is harmless.

Firstly, yes, this is an INVALID key now.

After I think after Win2000 Service Pack 2 (though I really think it was SP1), this key was invalidated by MS (many people ran tests and it showed that this key was no longer being called by the system). As WinXP usually follows Win2000, I would say it was invalidated for WinXP as well.

Also, performance increases are also seen in applications like video editing when this key did work.

  Quote
Firstly, yes, this is an INVALID key now.

After I think after Win2000 Service Pack 2 (though I really think it was SP1), this key was invalidated by MS (many people ran tests and it showed that this key was no longer being called by the system). As WinXP usually follows Win2000, I would say it was invalidated for WinXP as well.

Do you know of any sites that confirm this? Because online information regarding this setting is very limited and the opinions on its validity seem to be coming from other forums with no real proof. I'm not saying its not true I just like to be certain. For example Microsoft makes no reference to this setting one way or the other that I could find.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, what if the AI skips over some "editor's" personally cherished lie in an article? The Horror!
    • eagerly awaiting a version that runs on android tablets
    • I grew up with the Beach Boys. Even saw them in concert in the 70's. Brian suffered from mental issues all his life. May you find peace wherever you are.
    • Wikipedia suffers backlash from human editors over AI summaries, prompting feature pause by David Uzondu Wikipedia editors have pushed back against plans from the Wikimedia Foundation to test AI-generated article summaries, powered by Aya, the open-weight AI model from Cohere. The non-profit has now paused the project. The decision came after a swift and overwhelmingly negative reaction from its community. As first reported by 404Media, the plan involved a two-week, opt-in trial on the mobile version of Wikipedia. But the volunteer editors who build the encyclopedia met the idea with immediate and fierce opposition. The project's discussion page became a torrent of rejection. It included simple comments like "Yuck" and blunt declarations like "strongest possible oppose" and "Absolutely not." One editor argued that a test would cause "immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source." They noted that Wikipedia has built its name on being sober and reliable, not flashy. Another feared it would destroy the site's collaborative model. They argued that while the "collective mass" of human editors "evens out into a beautiful corpus," the AI would install "one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV [neutral point-of-view] issues" at the very top of an article. That same editor also noted the following: For context, this is what AI-generated summaries on the platform was supposed to look like: Image: 404Media It is not hard to see why they are so protective. The editors' fears are grounded in recent and very public failures of AI features from tech giants. For example, Google's AI overviews recently hit 1.5 billion monthly users. The feature became a laughingstock for telling people to put glue on their pizza and that a dog had played in the NBA. This is the kind of humiliating error Wikipedia's community is desperate to avoid, as it would undermine two-plus decades of careful work. We also saw the potential for reputational damage back in January. That was when Apple's AI feature falsely generated a notification claiming that Luigi Mangione had died by suicide. The man was actually alive and in custody. On the site's technical discussion page earlier today, Marshall Miller (MMiller), a Senior Director at the Wikimedia Foundation, posted an update acknowledging the feedback. He admitted, "It's clear we could have done a better job introducing this idea," and confirmed the experiment was paused. The Foundation says the goal was to explore accessibility for different readers. While this specific test is off the table, the organization still wants to use new technologies. Miller ended with a promise: "We do not have any plans for bringing a summary feature to the wikis without editor involvement." A WMF spokesperson also told 404Media that though the feature has been paused, the foundation is still interested in AI-generated summaries. The spokesperson insisted the goal was to eventually build moderation systems where "humans remain central" and called this kind of backlash feedback part of what makes Wikipedia a "truly collaborative platform."
    • I see, yeah that makes sense. I have been in situations where I barely did not crush badly on the road due to other driver starting to change lanes into another car - freaked out last second and avoided it by crashing into the side of the bridge instead. i got away because I quickly changed lanes 2 times in a couple of second and unlike that idiot I did not lose control big part of this was my car was good 😊 (audi a7) vs the old van the crashed driver was driving would AI be able to react and quickly change lanes twice both time barely avoiding collision … I don’t know my car systems pumped the breaks and tried to warn me with a beep and vibration but if I slammed the breaks the car behind me would hit me then again I have BMW driver training and a good car - so I have no idea how robot taxi would react i am not sure extreme fast lane changes would be programmed in - it is dangerous as hell unless you are FULLY aware, and have done it before but it is a general risk to do it especially in the conditions with bad weather and when you are not driving a sports car with 4 wheel drive and very good control
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Apprentice
      Cole Multipass went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Posting Machine
      David Uzondu earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Month Later
      Stokenking earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      267
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      193
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!