My Insane Apple Rant (yes, it is flamebait)


Recommended Posts

I really can not take much more of the speculation about the forthcoming iSlate, iPad or iWhatever. Therefore, I am launching a preemptive motion against this nonsense. I am going to give a presentation about how it should have gone... so that when you are talking about the wonderful little iGadget you might leave the Jobs Reality Distortion filled long enough to realize what you missed out on.

1). iPhone OS 3.2 for everyone (i.e. all current devices)

2). iPhone OS 4.0 demonstration with multitasking for next generation iPhone/iPod Touch (you know the one OLED, camera and ATT VOIP)

3). Some brief talk about the iPhone being available off the ATT network within the year, but if you stay with ATT... you get xyz.

4). Mac Home Server replaces the Mac Mini... it is a hybrid of WHS and in the clouds computing experience... see item #6.

5). iBook. It's not a Kindle, nor is it a massive screen iPod Touch. What it is, is a next generation Mac device... akin to the original iMac. It is Intel's answer to Nvidia. It has a new Atom dual core design, SSD storage, good gaming GPU, 10" display (that rotates), full ink tablet use, Wifi and runs a full version of Mac OSX.

6). Finally, the one more thing. They've moved into the clouds. It will begin with OSX. I like to think of it as Apple's response to Chrome OS. It will be available to everyone. It will be a full version of OSX. Full Xcode API. Full desktop with applications like iWork, iLife and many, many others.

Now this would be a show that didn't blow...

What you will get instead:

1). iPhone 3.2 (sometime this summer)

2). Crippled iPad device that is a mix between a Kindle and an iPod Touch with two year contract from ATT (otherwise over $1000)

3). No talk of Apple leaving the ATT network... strange bedfellows they do make (Apple and ATT)

4). iTunes in the clouds... for an extra fee you can stream your library (wow)

5). Maybe something about a more powerful Mac... maybe.

I know you're just being imaginative, but no way that they would go with an atom processor in a tablet. They've put too much time and money into the ARM architecture which offers much more performance per watt than the atom chips.

I get the feeling that the same people who will nitpick the tablet (or whatever it is) tomorrow (or are doing so already without any real information at all) are the same people who deemed the iPhone a complete failure because it didn't have MMS or Copy and Paste at launch. Even though they were legitimate shortcomings the iPhone still managed to move the bar for mobile phone companies. Look at what Motorola and Google are doing for example as compared to three years ago.

Edited by Stetson

Although Flamebaiting is against the rules, I fail to see how this is flamebaiting exactly. Incoherent rambling. Is there a point somewhere? Can we have some more speculation about Apple before tomorrow? The Internet does not quite have enough speculative posts yet.... :D

These are the points Apple has to hit for the keynote to be a success:

1) Introduce a tablet/slate

2) Announce that the iPhone is not going to be AT&T exclusive anymore, even though I'm in Canada and can choose from Bell, Telus, or Rogers anyway. And even on this point, they won't trash talk AT&T.

3) Release a beta of either iPhone 3.2 or iPhone 4.0 to developers, or release it to the public

4) iLife/Work '10, although I wouldn't be surprised to see this introduced on their website in the next few months. This is a wildcard.

Throw all of that into a keynote, and you've probably got some good results. Remember, Apple works in cycles: I'm expecting to see some spec bumps on some hardware, but all of the hardware has been updated recently. The iPhone is updated in June every year. The iPods have been updated in September since what, 2005? And Apple is increasingly announcing things without a stevenote, on their website. You don't need a keynote to announce a few new features or spec bumps anymore.

OP: I'm gonna be frank with you, those expectations are ridiculous. No company would introduce that many new products in one keynote and ship them soon after, especially not one like Apple who likes to maintain a small product line instead of overwhelming the customer. A lot of companies introduce things at their keynotes that will come out "some time in the future", but Apple's only really done that twice, with the iPhone and Apple TV. They usually introduce products that are shipping within a month of being announced - and usually, they ship the next day.

I'm going to lol when apple doesn't announce a tablet and also when they don't mention the iphone is going multicarrier/leaving att.

There are 2 things wrong with this statement

  1. IT will never be "Multicarier" (See #2)
  2. AT&T no longer deserves the tittle "Carrier" as it was us iPhone users who "Carried" them all this time

:whistle:

  • Like 2

If the Apple Tablet is simply an enlarged iPhone, running the iPhone OS, then I will honestly fail to see its use, and if it's as expensive as speculation hints it will be, then I think it's sure to be a flop. If it's running the iPhone OS, then it's essentially an enlarged iPhone sold at a higher price, and what good is that? I sincerely hope that it runs OS X so it can actually be useful and maybe be worth what Apple will likely charge for it.

If the Tablet is nonexistent though, the tech world will be completely disappointed. Even if Apple never wanted to make a Tablet, they should just to satisfy the general public considering how much the media has hyped this thing up, lol.

If the Apple Tablet is simply an enlarged iPhone, running the iPhone OS, then I will honestly fail to see its use, and if it's as expensive as speculation hints it will be, then I think it's sure to be a flop. If it's running the iPhone OS, then it's essentially an enlarged iPhone sold at a higher price, and what good is that? I sincerely hope that it runs OS X so it can actually be useful and maybe be worth what Apple will likely charge for it.

If the Tablet is nonexistent though, the tech world will be completely disappointed. Even if Apple never wanted to make a Tablet, they should just to satisfy the general public considering how much the media has hyped this thing up, lol.

If the tablet has an Apple logo on it, it will sell. Personally It would be a better option to me if it ran OSX, running a platform as watered down as the iPhone OS on a tablet would be pretty poor really. It may work well on a phone, but it wouldn't go on a tablet IMO.

If the tablet has an Apple logo on it, it will sell. Personally It would be a better option to me if it ran OSX, running a platform as watered down as the iPhone OS on a tablet would be pretty poor really. It may work well on a phone, but it wouldn't go on a tablet IMO.

Attempting to sell a watered down tablet as you put it at ~$1000 may not fly even with the Apple logo on it, because people would find the iPhone to be of better value. I guess we'll all find out tomorrow, but I really hope that the tablet isn't as watered down as the rumored suggest it to be.

Attempting to sell a watered down tablet as you put it at ~$1000 may not fly even with the Apple logo on it, because people would find the iPhone to be of better value. I guess we'll all find out tomorrow, but I really hope that the tablet isn't as watered down as the rumored suggest it to be.

I dunno, I recon some Apple diehards may, but it wouldn't sell en-masse. I'd like to hope that Apple wouldn't be that stupid, but then look at the first gen iPhone. Really though, people expect a tablet to essentially be a mini PC, so I couldn't imagine them getting away with using the iPhone OS on it, but I guess we will wait and see.

Oh it'll sell, but it won't be an epic hit like the iPhone was or like everyone anticipates it to be. With tablets and tablet-netbooks out there running Windows 7, the Apple Tablet definitely needs to be functional, and the best way to do that is to have it run OS X, unless they have something even better up their sleeves which we have no clue about.

I don't see much use for it especially if it doesn't have flash. People like netbooks to bring to class and such and the iPad would be horrible for that from what I can tell. Also why carry around a still large product with a crippled OS versus one running a full OS plus a keyboard?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!