Command & Conquer 4 "Open" Beta


Recommended Posts

I gave the beta a go, having been a loyal Command & Conquer fan as far back as I can remember, and I think I can safely say the game I played was not Command & Conquer - it honestly seems like they've taken another game, chucked the CnC units and story outline in, and said "That's the CnC cash cow milked for another year", before rolling around naked in all the money they've already made out of the series.

^ My take on it was they wanted this RTS to be made towards casual gamers who might find base building, resource management more difficult to micromanager so they removed everything.

If you want to dumb down the game to cater for the lowest common denominator, then go right ahead... but do it in a franchise that hasn't got millions of loyal fans.

Command and Conquer is base building, gathering resources, building units, and attacking the enemy. This isn't Command and Conquer, by definition!

  • Like 2

I installed the beta and I couldn't find a game to play. I wasted 5 minutes going from Campaign to Skirmish, etc and I didn't even play a single game. What a waste of hard drive space.

If you want to dumb down the game to cater for the lowest common denominator, then go right ahead... but do it in a franchise that hasn't got millions of loyal fans.

Command and Conquer is base building, gathering resources, building units, and attacking the enemy. This isn't Command and Conquer, by definition!

I agree. They ruined this game. They dont realize how large enough the hardcore CnC fan base is. They left all of them in the dust with a game that is not CnC that we know and love but has the CnC name. I just dont understand their mindset with this. Also, their art team have been making some weird design choices. Their units are all poorly done. Theres something about this group of developers that are just ruining this game.

If you want to dumb down the game to cater for the lowest common denominator, then go right ahead... but do it in a franchise that hasn't got millions of loyal fans.

Command and Conquer is base building, gathering resources, building units, and attacking the enemy. This isn't Command and Conquer, by definition!

Couldn't have said it better myself. While I haven't tried the beta (and after reading through this thread, I have no intention of doing so), the videos I've watched haven't shown me anything to suggest that a true C&C fan would be satisfied with this.

It's strange, because even as recently as Kane's Wrath, the developers made a pretty good effort to create something that the competitive C&C community would like. I remember reading somewhere that they even invited high-profile members of the community to their office to play a beta of Kane's Wrath and give their feedback. KW didn't take off in the competitive scene (too many imbalances, if I recall), but at least the developers attempted to reach out the community. Now it just seems like they're not even trying.

I'll just leave this here. cry.gif

I may sound melodramatic but I am devastated that they are doing this to C&C. They could've done a spinoff series like Generals to test their new play style without having to ruin what is fun about C&C. This is just ridiculous.

Watching that vid I had flash backs to Dark Reign. First game was a fun RTS, second game was some sort of 3D nightmare with some completely different story line :\ I wish it werent so the gameplay doesnt appeal to me but theyll be getting my money as I have to see how the story all pans out.

I may sound melodramatic but I am devastated that they are doing this to C&C. They could've done a spinoff series like Generals to test their new play style without having to ruin what is fun about C&C. This is just ridiculous.

Indeed. I almost feel like if they had just created a new game franchise (or a spinoff like you suggested), the response wouldn't have been nearly as negative. It certainly wouldn't take off in competitive circles (the lack of base building guarantees that), but I think people would have given it more of a chance. The C&C franchise has a lot of history, and people don't like seeing Westwood's beloved creation defiled like this.

I haven't tried it yet but I like games where you are only given limited resources/units to win the mission. I don't really like base building too much especially if you can build unlimited armies.. less strategical approach... just build 200 tanks and 50 anti-air vehicles and you'll get an instant win

I haven't tried it yet but I like games where you are only given limited resources/units to win the mission. I don't really like base building too much especially if you can build unlimited armies.. less strategical approach... just build 200 tanks and 50 anti-air vehicles and you'll get an instant win

So you're saying there is no strategy to having to build certain buildings to be able to use certain units while handling your income? All while making sure your base is safe from ground and air attacks? And taking into account building location, location of resources and natural formations?

Yeah, I'd much rather have a base drop from the sky and then start pumping out units. blink.gif

It was much easier to "pump out units" and spam people to death in the previous C&C games. The different classes give you different units, capabilities and roles as part of the team. It's not simply about who's got the faster/better build order like the previous C&C games. The element of teamwork is key. If a team mates don't pull their weight the other team will easily over power you and conquer more of the map since you can't build any kind of unit you want and manage the entire map yourself. Tiberium is still an important part of the game as you have to collect enough for upgrades, abilities and upper tier units. Controlling and holding key points on the map gives you access to more Tiberium thus giving the advantage over the other team. Tiberium drops are scattered through out the map so it requires each player on your team to gather the Tiberium in the area that they control. People have tried to spam certain units in the beta but it's easily countered especially with team mates swinging into action with some back up. It's easy for one player to steamroll the enemy in this game but this only seems to happen when the teams are horribly unbalanced. Someone can take the support class and (with enough tiberium gathered) build some 'wtfpwn' units as the kids say these days and blow everything to smithereens but if the other team is any good they will be able to hold them off or prevent them from amassing such a force in the first place.

That being said I still think this game is crap. Yes, it is different from the good ol' C&C but I don't really mind that. It had potential if they would have took time to design and build a proper game. Most elements of this game are way too simple. As I mentioned above the tiberium is important but after like 20-25 tiberium points you can pretty much upgrade everything. This usually happens pretty early on in the game if your teammates aren't noobs and gather tiberium properly. The unit selection is pretty poor too. You'd think by removing base building they'd have more units, special abilities or more depth or something to keep things interesting but there's really only a handful and it's the same few units that people tend to use. There's a quite few units that people never use unless people build them for the lulz.

The whole level system is garbage too. It's way too easy to level up and 20 is the max level. You can level up to 20 in a few games by playing with some decent people and playing a supportive role to gain XP. The low level players end up being pretty useless on their own because they can't build any useful units especially late game when you're faced with tier 3 units and stuff. The game is supposed to be released soon (March or soemthing?) so I really don't see them overhauling the level system.

They should have made the maps a little larger and added more reward for capturing control points like building specific units, unlocking tech trees or something. If the maps were bigger they could have Tiberium harvesting in certain zones while other control points unlock certain tech trees for units and upgrades. That way there would still be a monetary system rather than a dumbed down Tiberium drop thing. If the level system been a per match type thing. i.e. Each game everyone starts from lvl. 1 and works their way up. This would remove the imbalance between players in a match right from the beginning.

IMO EA is just another megacorp who's only motivation is making money. It's pretty apparent from this and the last few C&C games that their primary goal is to slap together a product, market it and wait for the cash to roll in.

I guess that's my main quirk with it. It's not about "teams." I played C&C mainly for the single player campaign and the story. Multiplayer was just a bonus thrown in. I want to hear about what Nod is doing and how I can counterattack in a particular scenario. Then I want to play the Nod side to see how the scenario played out from that point of view. I guess everything is going multiplayer these days. Maybe they could've made a C&C MP edition and played around with online balancing there. Then they could've released a "proper" C&C 4.

I agree, a lot of things seem to be going multiplayer. ?I want to play the game in my own time and not rely on other people :(

I really hope someone creates a game to get this C&C market, because C&C seems to have hurt themselves now with this.

  • 1 month later...

Steam says it got released today. Is that true? I haven't heard anything about it since the open beta.

I got an email from Impulse saying the same thing so I guess it's out. I guess the series ends not with a bang, but with a whimper.

Wow none of the reviews have much to say about the single player except it was limp, too short, not engaging and Kane didnt get a fitting ending :( since I have no interest in MP I guess ill have to wait till this hits the cheap bin before I can play it to see how it all ends.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2026.001.21662 by Razvan Serea Adobe Acrobat Reader DC software is the free, trusted standard for viewing, printing, signing, and annotating PDFs. Its the only PDF viewer that can open and interact with all types of PDF content – including forms and multimedia. It’s connected to Adobe Document Cloud – so you can work with PDFs on computers and mobile devices. Adobe Document Cloud is a revolutionary, modern and efficient way to get work done with documents in the office, at home or on-the-go. At the heart of Document Cloud is the all-new Adobe Acrobat DC, which will take e-signatures mainstream by delivering free e-signing with every individual subscription. Document Cloud includes a set of integrated services that use a consistent online profile and personal document hub. With Adobe Document Cloud, people will be able to create, review, approve, sign and track documents whether on a desktop or mobile device. Businesses will be able to take advantage of Document Cloud for enterprise which provides enterprise-class document services that integrate into systems of record such as CRM, HCM, CLM, and CMS, adding speed, efficiency and transparency to getting business done with documents. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC new feature highlights: Work with PDFs from anywhere with the new, free Acrobat DC mobile app for Android or iOS. Select functionality is also available on Windows Phone. Use the new Fill & Sign tool in your desktop software to complete PDF forms fast with smart autofill. Download the free Adobe Fill & Sign mobile app to add the same option to your iPad or Android tablet device. Save money on ink and toner when printing from your Windows PC. Store and access files in Adobe Document Cloud with 5GB of free storage. Get instant access to recent files across desktop, web, and mobile devices with Mobile Link. Sync your Fill & Sign autofill collection across desktop, web, and iPad devices. Adobe PDF Pack premium features includes: Convert documents and images to PDF files. Use your mobile device camera to take a picture of a paper document or form and convert it to PDF. Turn PDFs into editable Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or RTF files. Combine multiple files into a single PDF (web only). Get signatures from others with a complete e-signature service. Send, track, and confirm delivery of documents electronically instead of using fax or overnight services (tracking not available on mobile). Store and access files online with 20GB of storage. Download: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 64-bit | 719.0 MB (Freeware) Link: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson, Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to exploit a prompt injection vulnerability. Hackers managed to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!