Platinum Games Unveils New Title 'Vanquish'


Recommended Posts

January 28, 2010 - Tonight, Platinum Games unveiled a debut trailer for its new title Vanquish, which appears to be another take on the shooter genre.

The trailer contained no actual gameplay footage, but instead treated us all with an impressive blend of live action sequences and CGI. As for the story, there's an alien attack on the United States and one man in a white combat suit is sent to put a stop to the war.

Sound familiar?

The game will be headed up by producer Atsushi Inaba, who previously worked on Devil May Cry, God Hand, and Mad World, and famed Resident Evil creator Shinji Mikami. Yeah, get excited.

Though no other details were released, we'd venture to guess this will be a PlayStation 3/Xbox 360 title. However, the character design is reminiscent of P.N.03, a Gamecube title released in 2003, so it may also appear on the Wii.

We hope to have more details on this soon.

News Source

Debut Trailer

  • 8 months later...

Has anyone picked this game up yet? I should be receiving my gamefly copy tomorrow. This has been one of my most anticipated games this year.

Here's a brilliant review from gametrailers. I'm so excited to play it. The innovator of 3rd person shooters looks like he's innovating once again.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/review-hd-vanquish/706375

I can't see or hear the words "I need a weapon" without thinking of that Halo Bollywood video :p . Anyways...

I just watched the trailer, and it looks pretty fun. I certainly wouldn't buy this at full price, since it apparently only has about 4-6 hours of gameplay (depending on how fast you go). I'll probably take Ars Technica's advice and give it a rent.

From that review, it sounds like the game features a pretty ridiculous plot and some over-the-top dialogue. Between Bulletstorm and Vanquish, I'm happy that we're seeing a little less seriousness in our games.

I forgot which review I read it from but it said every single scene in the game is an amazing action setpiece. Although the game is only 6 hours long, having that much in the game weighs over time length for me.

Edit: It was gamespot

Any given Vanquish level might be considered a high-energy set-piece sequence in another game. You rush across a collapsing bridge while fending off armored foes; battle inside a cylindrical construct in which the entire inner surface exerts a gravitational pull; and gun down huge armored vehicles outfitted with intimidating drills. Other levels give you short but welcome breathers while letting you focus on Vanquish's other impressive elements. A calm section involving sniping a series of spotlights lets you take in the game's intricate futuristic environments and attractive lighting.

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/vanquish/review.html

In general, the game looks quite fun and over the top. But, I absolutely hate the pose and animation they gave Sam when he boosts around. It looks stupid and it irritates the hell out of me for some reason.

I forgot which review I read it from but it said every single scene in the game is an amazing action setpiece. Although the game is only 6 hours long, having that much in the game weighs over time length for me.

I definitely agree on that one. Sometimes it's better for a game to be short, since trying to pad it for length would ruin the pacing. Limbo (to pick a random example off the top of my head) may have been short, but it was probably better off that way, since that's not the type of game that you can drag to a ~20 hour length. I'm thinking that this is probably the same way.

It's just difficult to justify spending $60 on a game that will take me six hours, especially in a season loaded with $60 games that I'll sink over 20 hours into (Black Ops, GT5, Civ 5 for $50). I suppose that I might be tempted to replay it if it's really good, but it's hard to say.

I already bought the game (havn't had time to play it though), this is the first game that got 9/10 score in a while on gametrailers.com (even new vegas got 8.6, which I thought is little high for that game).

My gamefly copy came in last night but I as well didn't play it. I plan on trying it out tonight. Reviews to come

Last night I was able to get couple of chapter in Act 1, though there's isn't much about the story the action is amazing. Everything just works; controls are the best I've seen in a long time. They're quick and don?t make you work hard like GoW or any other game in the same genre.

I'm giving it 9/10, it's not for multiplayer though like lot of you nowadays expect in each game. But SP (like I for one look forward too) this is really a good game, and it has a moderaly high replay value on the days you just feel like shooting AI robots.

I said to DrunknMunky on Messenger a couple of months ago before the demo came out that it looks like the MGS Raiden Game we want with crazy fast action and looking badass while doing it, minus the sword, lol.

I will be waiting till it is cheaper, but I definitely want to pick it up at some point.

I just love the powerslide - can't recall seeing that move in any other game. I love the AR mode too.

Identifying enemy and knowing what you're meant to be doing is a bit tough because it's so frenetic but the game feels so fluid you don't really mind.

Lost Planet meets Gears of War meets Mass Effect meets Ninja Gaiden <3

That sounds very tempting. My list of games to purchase this fall isn't very big right now, so I'm trying to justify purchasing this one. If I could find it for even $10 off, that would do it for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!