Platinum Games Unveils New Title 'Vanquish'


Recommended Posts

January 28, 2010 - Tonight, Platinum Games unveiled a debut trailer for its new title Vanquish, which appears to be another take on the shooter genre.

The trailer contained no actual gameplay footage, but instead treated us all with an impressive blend of live action sequences and CGI. As for the story, there's an alien attack on the United States and one man in a white combat suit is sent to put a stop to the war.

Sound familiar?

The game will be headed up by producer Atsushi Inaba, who previously worked on Devil May Cry, God Hand, and Mad World, and famed Resident Evil creator Shinji Mikami. Yeah, get excited.

Though no other details were released, we'd venture to guess this will be a PlayStation 3/Xbox 360 title. However, the character design is reminiscent of P.N.03, a Gamecube title released in 2003, so it may also appear on the Wii.

We hope to have more details on this soon.

News Source

Debut Trailer

  • 8 months later...

Has anyone picked this game up yet? I should be receiving my gamefly copy tomorrow. This has been one of my most anticipated games this year.

Here's a brilliant review from gametrailers. I'm so excited to play it. The innovator of 3rd person shooters looks like he's innovating once again.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/review-hd-vanquish/706375

I can't see or hear the words "I need a weapon" without thinking of that Halo Bollywood video :p . Anyways...

I just watched the trailer, and it looks pretty fun. I certainly wouldn't buy this at full price, since it apparently only has about 4-6 hours of gameplay (depending on how fast you go). I'll probably take Ars Technica's advice and give it a rent.

From that review, it sounds like the game features a pretty ridiculous plot and some over-the-top dialogue. Between Bulletstorm and Vanquish, I'm happy that we're seeing a little less seriousness in our games.

I forgot which review I read it from but it said every single scene in the game is an amazing action setpiece. Although the game is only 6 hours long, having that much in the game weighs over time length for me.

Edit: It was gamespot

Any given Vanquish level might be considered a high-energy set-piece sequence in another game. You rush across a collapsing bridge while fending off armored foes; battle inside a cylindrical construct in which the entire inner surface exerts a gravitational pull; and gun down huge armored vehicles outfitted with intimidating drills. Other levels give you short but welcome breathers while letting you focus on Vanquish's other impressive elements. A calm section involving sniping a series of spotlights lets you take in the game's intricate futuristic environments and attractive lighting.

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/vanquish/review.html

In general, the game looks quite fun and over the top. But, I absolutely hate the pose and animation they gave Sam when he boosts around. It looks stupid and it irritates the hell out of me for some reason.

I forgot which review I read it from but it said every single scene in the game is an amazing action setpiece. Although the game is only 6 hours long, having that much in the game weighs over time length for me.

I definitely agree on that one. Sometimes it's better for a game to be short, since trying to pad it for length would ruin the pacing. Limbo (to pick a random example off the top of my head) may have been short, but it was probably better off that way, since that's not the type of game that you can drag to a ~20 hour length. I'm thinking that this is probably the same way.

It's just difficult to justify spending $60 on a game that will take me six hours, especially in a season loaded with $60 games that I'll sink over 20 hours into (Black Ops, GT5, Civ 5 for $50). I suppose that I might be tempted to replay it if it's really good, but it's hard to say.

I already bought the game (havn't had time to play it though), this is the first game that got 9/10 score in a while on gametrailers.com (even new vegas got 8.6, which I thought is little high for that game).

My gamefly copy came in last night but I as well didn't play it. I plan on trying it out tonight. Reviews to come

Last night I was able to get couple of chapter in Act 1, though there's isn't much about the story the action is amazing. Everything just works; controls are the best I've seen in a long time. They're quick and don?t make you work hard like GoW or any other game in the same genre.

I'm giving it 9/10, it's not for multiplayer though like lot of you nowadays expect in each game. But SP (like I for one look forward too) this is really a good game, and it has a moderaly high replay value on the days you just feel like shooting AI robots.

I said to DrunknMunky on Messenger a couple of months ago before the demo came out that it looks like the MGS Raiden Game we want with crazy fast action and looking badass while doing it, minus the sword, lol.

I will be waiting till it is cheaper, but I definitely want to pick it up at some point.

I just love the powerslide - can't recall seeing that move in any other game. I love the AR mode too.

Identifying enemy and knowing what you're meant to be doing is a bit tough because it's so frenetic but the game feels so fluid you don't really mind.

Lost Planet meets Gears of War meets Mass Effect meets Ninja Gaiden <3

That sounds very tempting. My list of games to purchase this fall isn't very big right now, so I'm trying to justify purchasing this one. If I could find it for even $10 off, that would do it for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!