Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was wondering if something knows this. On Windows XP you could install Windows Desktop Search and I could add a mapped network drive to be indexed. In fact, if I remember correctly, you could even add a UNC path to be indexed.

I cannot find this in Windows 7, either by UNC nor with a mapped network drive. Am I looking in the wrong places or is this simply not possible? Does anyone know?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/870354-indexing-options/
Share on other sites

I'd like to know this too, because I have been unsuccessful in getting Windows to index my drives on my NAS. It wants to create an "offline backup" (a local copy), which completely defeats the purpose of network storage. I can't add my music and films (stored on my NAS) to my Libraries unless it is indexed, rendering Libraries completely useless for me.

Hi,

I was wondering if something knows this. On Windows XP you could install Windows Desktop Search and I could add a mapped network drive to be indexed. In fact, if I remember correctly, you could even add a UNC path to be indexed.

I cannot find this in Windows 7, either by UNC nor with a mapped network drive. Am I looking in the wrong places or is this simply not possible? Does anyone know?

Thanks

Had the same problem with my Windows 7 and my WHS box. You need to add the folder(s) to the Windows 7 Libraries first.

My Windows 7 box wouldn't search my 'Music' folder on my WHS box untill I added \\Server\Music to the Music library.

I have a Qnap 409 Turbo NAS, it's not running a Windows OS on it, so I can't enable indexing directly on it.

I think Singh400 might be on the right track, I'll give that a go as soon as I'm home again.

Making the drive available offline, won't that keep a local cached copy? If so, I don't have enough space locally to cache all that data. But I'll look into it.

Thanks a lot for your replies :)

I think Singh400 might be on the right track, I'll give that a go as soon as I'm home again.
You can add a UNC location via Group Policy, but when I did that it didn't help the situation. The files were still not properly indexed.

I found it odd that Windows 7 didn't supprt adding a UNC path to the index locations. But yet when I RD'ed into my WHS box and checked my index settings there, I could add a UNC path.

Libraries was the only solution to my problem.

This patch broke the single sign-on, or pass-through authentication on IE in our environment. If you're installing this in a company network, look out for that. On the other hand, we didn't really have an issue installing it, so far it installed fine on all of the machines that got it. Try also to have a look in the Event Logs, there might be something too.

Windows cannot index UNC / network share locations. Instead, it is preferred that the server run the Windows Search indexer or a similar index supporting the WS remote search protocol.

Unfortunately most standalone NAS drives do not fall into this bucket, which is why USB drives are generally preferred.

That said, you can still add a UNC path to your Music library, but you'll have to do it via an application such as WMP. You cannot do it via Explorer. Once you do this, some Library functionality will be disabled since it requires the included content to be indexed.

That said, you can still add a UNC path to your Music library, but you'll have to do it via an application such as WMP. You cannot do it via Explorer. Once you do this, some Library functionality will be disabled since it requires the included content to be indexed.

Pretty sure I added mine via explorer...

Well, I tried indexing the mapped network drive by making it available offline, but it is still not working for me. Either I'm doing something wrong, or there is just too much data that is kept to make the files available offline. If this means it's making copies of them locally, then there is no way this will work.

I now disabled everything again and cleared the offline files. It's a shame, having this work in XP with Windows Desktop Search, but not in Windows 7.

Well, I tried indexing the mapped network drive by making it available offline, but it is still not working for me. Either I'm doing something wrong, or there is just too much data that is kept to make the files available offline. If this means it's making copies of them locally, then there is no way this will work.

I now disabled everything again and cleared the offline files. It's a shame, having this work in XP with Windows Desktop Search, but not in Windows 7.

Did you add "\\Server\Music" to the Music library? You didn't mention if you tried that yet.

Sorry Singh400, I forgot to get back to you on that.

I have a secondary HDD with my music and docs, then an external NAS where I sync the entire Documents and Music to. In addition, I have lots of digital pictures, movies, series, iso's, etc... on the NAS. This amounts to a few TB's. My NAS has a built-in media server for music (Twonky).

What I would like to have was to be able to search movies and series via de Start Menu. I can search my music via WMP, that's another way to do it, but it won't do it for series and movies

Sorry Singh400, I forgot to get back to you on that.

I have a secondary HDD with my music and docs, then an external NAS where I sync the entire Documents and Music to. In addition, I have lots of digital pictures, movies, series, iso's, etc... on the NAS. This amounts to a few TB's. My NAS has a built-in media server for music (Twonky).

What I would like to have was to be able to search movies and series via de Start Menu. I can search my music via WMP, that's another way to do it, but it won't do it for series and movies

Again, libraries is the answer. I just created a Software and Films libraries and after a couple of seconds, the locations \\SERVER\Films and \\SERVER\Software were searchable from the Start Menu. See the screenshot below to see what I mean.

79043240.jpg

(click here if you can't see it)

Good morning Singh,

thanks a lot for the screenshot, I have the same resolution :D

Unfortunately I tried the exact same thing, and for me it is not working. I left the PC turned on for 48 hours, but even after that time it wouldn't find anything in the library. There is one thing still missing from your screenshot, you need to right-click on the mapped drive and make it available offline. Since for you it is showing 27GB, maybe that still fits in your cache. I have over a TB and I think that might be why it won't work for me.

My main disk is a 640GB WD and the pre-alloted space for offline files is 140GB. That might be too low for the offline files, as I saw it filled in no time when I enabled the "Make available offline".

I have some smaller sized shares, I'll try and give one of those a try this evening.

Thanks a lot for your help and patience (Y)

Unfortunately I tried the exact same thing, and for me it is not working. I left the PC turned on for 48 hours, but even after that time it wouldn't find anything in the library. There is one thing still missing from your screenshot, you need to right-click on the mapped drive and make it available offline. Since for you it is showing 27GB, maybe that still fits in your cache. I have over a TB and I think that might be why it won't work for me.

Making it available off-line defeats the purpose entirely. Besides I've disabled the ability to make off-line copies. Nor are any of my server shares mapped in 'My Computer'.

My main disk is a 640GB WD and the pre-alloted space for offline files is 140GB. That might be too low for the offline files, as I saw it filled in no time when I enabled the "Make available offline".

My main disk is a Samsung F1 750GB, and I've just created a new library called 'TV' comes in at a huge 931GB, then I added "\\SERVER\TV Shows" and I can still search it fine from the Start Menu.

I have some smaller sized shares, I'll try and give one of those a try this evening.

Just a thought - you do have the files set to be indexed don't you? See image below...

70015924.jpg

Didn't the latest Power Pack for WHS add library support?

Bingo! We have a winner. I guess the big difference is that I am running WHS + PP3, and Odom is just running a standard NAS box (ie; no WHS).

In that case I guess you are stuck Odom. But do take a look at the tool found by jnelsoninjax (Y)

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the late reply, it's been a few busy days.

I gave that tool a go, however it still doesn't make the folder indexable. I added a UNC path to the Video library, but this I could also do without that tool. So, I fail to see the point of having it. It doesn't really allow me to do something I couldn't already do before.

I guess I'm stuck :) ... or I can always re-install XP with Windows Desktop Search :laugh:

Thanks for all your help :) !!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!