I can see again - LASIK Laser Eye Surgery


Recommended Posts

I've been wearing a combination of glasses and lenses for pretty much the last 15-16 years. Vanity makes me not wear glasses outside the house, and lenses tended to get uncomfortable late into the night. I was down to my last month of lenses (If you want them and have the same prescripon as me click here) and was about to order more, after thinking about the expenses of it all I decided to think about surgery instead. I spoke with a few friends that have had the procedure recently and all spoke well of it, with this I decided to take the plunge and get it done.

I originally went for my consultation with Optical Express last Friday 22/01/10 Took about an hour while they checked your prescription, took a map of the eye to indicate thickness of the cornea and also pressure tests on the eye too. Once they had the results from that they advised me that I was suitable :) Good news!

Next the shock...prices They offered two variables, either a mechanical cut of the eye for the first part or laser (Intralase), the laser is less intrusive and has a faster healing time but obviously comes with a cost. The next option was the type of surgery, they offered the standard LASIK or Wavefront , again the Wavefront was the more advanced and offered more chanes on the surface of the eye allowing better vision for night driving etc with halos/glare. The consultant then mentioned that if I could take one of the two cancelled slots for the following Friday they would offer 10% discount (probably offered to everyone) but given that I wanted it done I thought I might as well book in sooner rather than later.

Intralase with Standard came out at £1330 and Intralase with Wavefront was £2330 so quite a bit of difference. I booked up for the standard treatment as that was what my budget allowed for.

My parents picked me up and took me home, on the way we discussd it and they said they would pay the difference of the two, so called up and changed the treatment. (I love my parents!)

With that and only a week to go I really didn't have time to think about it too much, all I did was focus on the positives to come from it and nothing about the procedure, I knew all about it so nothing was a shock that I had been told.

Friday came (Yesterday) and I went for the treatment, they remapped my eye to check for any changes and then was taken in. The whole procedure took about 15-20 minutes I guess, maybe less. They put some anticeptic drops into the eye to numb them and water to keep them moist. They then used two different lasers, one to make the flap and the other to do the corrective surgery. The surgeon and assistant were really good and talked me through every process they were doing and there was no pain at all. Once done I sat in a dark room for about 40 minutes whilst the drops wore off and all of a sudden there was discomfort, similar to being poked in the eye or peeling onions. Nothing too bad, but certainly not a nice sensation. They checked the eyes to make sure all was good. Already I could tell that my distance vision was much better albeit cloudy and hazey.

Last night I had to wear goggles whilst sleeping (for a week) to make sure you don't rub your eyes during the night and damage the flap. Apparently the bulk of the healing is done in the first 24 hours though. I've been given 3 types of drops to use, antibiotic drops 4 times a day, anti-inflamatory 7 times a day, and liquid tears for lubrication been advised every hour or so.

Woke up this morning perfect vision, just had my 24 hour check and have better than 20/20 vision and fine to drive, so right now I would say it's possibly the best money I've ever spent!

Definitely inspired to highly consider Lasik for myself (pending that I'd be eligible.) I hate all of the money I've spent as well for glasses/contacts for the last 15 years for myself... I remember how much was forked over for when I first converted to contacts (hard lenses too :() but then over to soft.

Would definitely love to be able to see better at night as I have major issues with glare/halos, so I'd probably opt for whichever the non-standard treatment is for it.

Glad to hear how awesome your vision is though. I've put off my consideration for just extreme fear of my eyeballs being lazered away into oblivion.

Definitely inspired to highly consider Lasik for myself (pending that I'd be eligible.) I hate all of the money I've spent as well for glasses/contacts for the last 15 years for myself... I remember how much was forked over for when I first converted to contacts (hard lenses too :() but then over to soft.

Would definitely love to be able to see better at night as I have major issues with glare/halos, so I'd probably opt for whichever the non-standard treatment is for it.

Glad to hear how awesome your vision is though. I've put off my consideration for just extreme fear of my eyeballs being lazered away into oblivion.

they wont get lazered away, but wouldn't it be way cool to have lazer beams shoot from ure eyes ala Superman!?

I'd have it done, but I don't like them cutting the flap open. Seen videos of it and it looks gruesome. I'll wait 10 years or so until you put your face up against a machine and it does it all in 30 seconds, without cutting anything.

I honestly don't mean to upset or scare you, but I discussed laser eye surgery with my families optometrists in depth once last year, and the points he questioned that he said came up at conferences he took part in that may be relevant to me were :

- After laser eye surgery the exact ORIGINAL length of your eye is lost and this makes it difficult to impossible for cataract surgery later in life (you say they measured this, is the measurement documented and passed to medical records now?)

- I'm a long time practising martial artist, and laser eye surgery weakens the eye making it dangerous for combat sports.

were either of these points raised in any way at all?

If one day these issues were fully covered I'd love to have it done myself (though the actual surgery part of it scares the bejezus out of me)

Glad to hear your vision is amazing and all went well, I wish you all the best with it :)

Oh please.

It's not about how long it took, but about the equipment and the cost of development. The average CT scan costs at least $500 and you just lay down there and the operator presses a button. And they're a company after all, they're in for the monies :-)

They are really making some serious dough off that operation, 20 minutes with a laser and they want that much money? Oh please.

+1

Watch a couple youtube vids, buy a powerful laser pen off the internet, get some girls and a couple sexy nurse outfits from Ann Summers. Your good to go! :laugh:

I had surgery in 2005. Lost 0.25 in the right eye already. Astigmatism is kicking in too.

That's what I'm worried about, too - my prescription isn't static, and if it continues to deteriorate after the LASIK surgery then I'll just end up needing glasses again soon anyway - so basically all those thousands of pounds would have been spent just to lower my prescription. Not sure if it's worth it then.

That's what I'm worried about, too - my prescription isn't static, and if it continues to deteriorate after the LASIK surgery then I'll just end up needing glasses again soon anyway - so basically all those thousands of pounds would have been spent just to lower my prescription. Not sure if it's worth it then.

If they want to operate you without being static, they are scamming you. One has to be static for several years (4 years in my case) before even considering surgery.

What ****ed me up was simply that I spend too much time in front of screens, read in bad conditions, et caetera.

I had LASEK back in 2005. I was not a good candidate for LASIK (shape of my eye wasn't good enough for the flap or whatever) and wanted a quicker recovery time then PRK. I now have 20/18 vision and have very little side effects. I guess my only "complaint" would be my eyes are sometimes dry...but that is just grabbing at really nothing. I do not have the nighttime halo effects.

Cool thing for the OP...since he just had it done...my eyesight just got better during the few months following the procedure.

Wow congratulations! My eyesight is terrible but I don't mind wearing glasses so I wouldn't consider this. You have great parents as well for paying the difference for you!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!