I can see again - LASIK Laser Eye Surgery


Recommended Posts

I've been wearing a combination of glasses and lenses for pretty much the last 15-16 years. Vanity makes me not wear glasses outside the house, and lenses tended to get uncomfortable late into the night. I was down to my last month of lenses (If you want them and have the same prescripon as me click here) and was about to order more, after thinking about the expenses of it all I decided to think about surgery instead. I spoke with a few friends that have had the procedure recently and all spoke well of it, with this I decided to take the plunge and get it done.

I originally went for my consultation with Optical Express last Friday 22/01/10 Took about an hour while they checked your prescription, took a map of the eye to indicate thickness of the cornea and also pressure tests on the eye too. Once they had the results from that they advised me that I was suitable :) Good news!

Next the shock...prices They offered two variables, either a mechanical cut of the eye for the first part or laser (Intralase), the laser is less intrusive and has a faster healing time but obviously comes with a cost. The next option was the type of surgery, they offered the standard LASIK or Wavefront , again the Wavefront was the more advanced and offered more chanes on the surface of the eye allowing better vision for night driving etc with halos/glare. The consultant then mentioned that if I could take one of the two cancelled slots for the following Friday they would offer 10% discount (probably offered to everyone) but given that I wanted it done I thought I might as well book in sooner rather than later.

Intralase with Standard came out at £1330 and Intralase with Wavefront was £2330 so quite a bit of difference. I booked up for the standard treatment as that was what my budget allowed for.

My parents picked me up and took me home, on the way we discussd it and they said they would pay the difference of the two, so called up and changed the treatment. (I love my parents!)

With that and only a week to go I really didn't have time to think about it too much, all I did was focus on the positives to come from it and nothing about the procedure, I knew all about it so nothing was a shock that I had been told.

Friday came (Yesterday) and I went for the treatment, they remapped my eye to check for any changes and then was taken in. The whole procedure took about 15-20 minutes I guess, maybe less. They put some anticeptic drops into the eye to numb them and water to keep them moist. They then used two different lasers, one to make the flap and the other to do the corrective surgery. The surgeon and assistant were really good and talked me through every process they were doing and there was no pain at all. Once done I sat in a dark room for about 40 minutes whilst the drops wore off and all of a sudden there was discomfort, similar to being poked in the eye or peeling onions. Nothing too bad, but certainly not a nice sensation. They checked the eyes to make sure all was good. Already I could tell that my distance vision was much better albeit cloudy and hazey.

Last night I had to wear goggles whilst sleeping (for a week) to make sure you don't rub your eyes during the night and damage the flap. Apparently the bulk of the healing is done in the first 24 hours though. I've been given 3 types of drops to use, antibiotic drops 4 times a day, anti-inflamatory 7 times a day, and liquid tears for lubrication been advised every hour or so.

Woke up this morning perfect vision, just had my 24 hour check and have better than 20/20 vision and fine to drive, so right now I would say it's possibly the best money I've ever spent!

Definitely inspired to highly consider Lasik for myself (pending that I'd be eligible.) I hate all of the money I've spent as well for glasses/contacts for the last 15 years for myself... I remember how much was forked over for when I first converted to contacts (hard lenses too :() but then over to soft.

Would definitely love to be able to see better at night as I have major issues with glare/halos, so I'd probably opt for whichever the non-standard treatment is for it.

Glad to hear how awesome your vision is though. I've put off my consideration for just extreme fear of my eyeballs being lazered away into oblivion.

Definitely inspired to highly consider Lasik for myself (pending that I'd be eligible.) I hate all of the money I've spent as well for glasses/contacts for the last 15 years for myself... I remember how much was forked over for when I first converted to contacts (hard lenses too :() but then over to soft.

Would definitely love to be able to see better at night as I have major issues with glare/halos, so I'd probably opt for whichever the non-standard treatment is for it.

Glad to hear how awesome your vision is though. I've put off my consideration for just extreme fear of my eyeballs being lazered away into oblivion.

they wont get lazered away, but wouldn't it be way cool to have lazer beams shoot from ure eyes ala Superman!?

I'd have it done, but I don't like them cutting the flap open. Seen videos of it and it looks gruesome. I'll wait 10 years or so until you put your face up against a machine and it does it all in 30 seconds, without cutting anything.

I honestly don't mean to upset or scare you, but I discussed laser eye surgery with my families optometrists in depth once last year, and the points he questioned that he said came up at conferences he took part in that may be relevant to me were :

- After laser eye surgery the exact ORIGINAL length of your eye is lost and this makes it difficult to impossible for cataract surgery later in life (you say they measured this, is the measurement documented and passed to medical records now?)

- I'm a long time practising martial artist, and laser eye surgery weakens the eye making it dangerous for combat sports.

were either of these points raised in any way at all?

If one day these issues were fully covered I'd love to have it done myself (though the actual surgery part of it scares the bejezus out of me)

Glad to hear your vision is amazing and all went well, I wish you all the best with it :)

Oh please.

It's not about how long it took, but about the equipment and the cost of development. The average CT scan costs at least $500 and you just lay down there and the operator presses a button. And they're a company after all, they're in for the monies :-)

They are really making some serious dough off that operation, 20 minutes with a laser and they want that much money? Oh please.

+1

Watch a couple youtube vids, buy a powerful laser pen off the internet, get some girls and a couple sexy nurse outfits from Ann Summers. Your good to go! :laugh:

I had surgery in 2005. Lost 0.25 in the right eye already. Astigmatism is kicking in too.

That's what I'm worried about, too - my prescription isn't static, and if it continues to deteriorate after the LASIK surgery then I'll just end up needing glasses again soon anyway - so basically all those thousands of pounds would have been spent just to lower my prescription. Not sure if it's worth it then.

That's what I'm worried about, too - my prescription isn't static, and if it continues to deteriorate after the LASIK surgery then I'll just end up needing glasses again soon anyway - so basically all those thousands of pounds would have been spent just to lower my prescription. Not sure if it's worth it then.

If they want to operate you without being static, they are scamming you. One has to be static for several years (4 years in my case) before even considering surgery.

What ****ed me up was simply that I spend too much time in front of screens, read in bad conditions, et caetera.

I had LASEK back in 2005. I was not a good candidate for LASIK (shape of my eye wasn't good enough for the flap or whatever) and wanted a quicker recovery time then PRK. I now have 20/18 vision and have very little side effects. I guess my only "complaint" would be my eyes are sometimes dry...but that is just grabbing at really nothing. I do not have the nighttime halo effects.

Cool thing for the OP...since he just had it done...my eyesight just got better during the few months following the procedure.

Wow congratulations! My eyesight is terrible but I don't mind wearing glasses so I wouldn't consider this. You have great parents as well for paying the difference for you!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!