I can see again - LASIK Laser Eye Surgery


Recommended Posts

For those that say this is cheap to run the machine and it's a rip off....

Yes, the press of a button and the power taken while running the machine is cheap

BUT...the development of the machine, testing, hardware, and software all add to the cost of the office to buy the machine which then has little human influence to have less chance of something going wrong while the operation is performed.

I am aiming for 2011 being the year I get this done :D

For those that say this is cheap to run the machine and it's a rip off....

Yes, the press of a button and the power taken while running the machine is cheap

BUT...the development of the machine, testing, hardware, and software all add to the cost of the office to buy the machine which then has little human influence to have less chance of something going wrong while the operation is performed.

I am aiming for 2011 being the year I get this done :D

Exactly, you aren't paying just for the procedure, you're paying for the research that went into it. In the same way that the standard procedure used to cost ?'000s but is now cheaper as they have clearly made back research/design costs and can offer at a cheaper rate.

Good luck with getting it done, I very much doubt you will regret it :)

When they did it could you smell your eyes burning? :shiftyninja:

There was a burning smell :p

Well, friend of mine who visits these boards as well had it done for what was estimated to be no more than $400 or $450 per eye, USD.

Apparently, Mexico is cool like that. His results were immediate and seem to have worked out better than a few other friends of mine who've had it done in the U.S. even. Just a thought for those who are looking at those $1,000+ per eye. :p

For those that say this is cheap to run the machine and it's a rip off....

Yes, the press of a button and the power taken while running the machine is cheap

BUT...the development of the machine, testing, hardware, and software all add to the cost of the office to buy the machine which then has little human influence to have less chance of something going wrong while the operation is performed.

I am aiming for 2011 being the year I get this done :D

Yeah and at that price I have a feeling they will make up for the price of the machine, salary, the entire place its located in and everybody's lunch for a year within a few years because every man and his dog seem to be getting this surgery. I still believe it's taking huge advantage of people because this surgery can really change people's lives so of course they are willing to pay but I still think it's a bit too steep.

So honestly, I just see you and others making excuses on behalf of the companies - Not to mention, the medical industry, hospitals and the like aren't actually known for

being cheap or fair.

Yeah and at that price I have a feeling they will make up for the price of the machine, salary, the entire place its located in and everybody's lunch for a year within a few years because every man and his dog seem to be getting this surgery. I still believe it's taking huge advantage of people because this surgery can really change people's lives so of course they are willing to pay but I still think it's a bit too steep.

So honestly, I just see you and others making excuses on behalf of the companies - Not to mention, the medical industry, hospitals and the like aren't actually known for

being cheap or fair.

I'm a great believer in that life changing procedures/medication should be a lot cheaper in this world. Sadly as places like Optical Express are businesses, I guess the Government has no say over what they can and can't charge for the work done and we just have to suck it up.

Congrats on the eye surgery. Mine has paid off big for me. I'm very happy after having lasik surgery . There are some limitations, but overall I have better than normal vision.

Where do you get your statistics on this? I've never heard of such such a thing. I know the military does LASEK (silmilar to PRK) as opposed to LASIK, Where the skin in front of the lens is removed completely. That I can understand somewhat with eye length. But the contact sport part seems to be BS. Many military professionals get this surgery and never have a problem. I advise people to get LASIK as it has faster healing time than LASEK.

No 'statistics' simply comments from my optometrist, and it's easily found with a few minutes simple web searching

LASIK

"Those with thinner corneas may suffer less than ideal results, flap may dislodge with trauma, increases higher order aberrations (HOA)**, uneven flap edges may lead to astigmatism, flap may result in scars, post-operational treatment is needed in approximately 5% of patients."

LASEK

"More discomfort than LASIK, takes longer to heal than LASIK, many diseases, medications, and conditions are contraindications, trauma, such as being hit in the eye may cause flap to dislodge, as a fairly new technique, long-term outcomes are not well established, increases HOA, blade can create uneven flap edges leading to astigmatism"

http://www.the-lasik-directory.com/lasik_lasek_chart.html

The RAF still has enough concerns that does not accept laser eye patients for airborne roles still.

I'm a great believer in that life changing procedures/medication should be a lot cheaper in this world. Sadly as places like Optical Express are businesses, I guess the Government has no say over what they can and can't charge for the work done and we just have to suck it up.

The machine used to perform LASIK costs around a million US. In some small way this contributes to the cost of the treatment as a good hospital will want to keep changing their machine as the technology gets better. It would be nice though if the cost of the treatment could be subsidised for people who could really use it.

The RAF still has enough concerns that does not accept laser eye patients for airborne roles still.

It has to do with concerns that people who have had vision correction done (especially from higher powers) have flawed depth perception.

Awesome news, good to hear :happy:

I'd always worry about anything going near my eyes, but luckily I don't have a need for glasses.... yet.... *ponders amount of hours the monitor burns my retinas playing WoW*

My best friend got it done last year at age 25. Reckons its the best money she's ever spent (along with her motorbike). Glad it went well, I remember she was a bit uptight about the whole thing, did my best to help and get her food ect given we share an apartment :)

Congrats on the eye surgery. Mine has paid off big for me. I'm very happy after having lasik surgery . There are some limitations, but overall I have better than normal vision.

Where do you get your statistics on this? I've never heard of such such a thing. I know the military does LASEK (silmilar to PRK) as opposed to LASIK, Where the skin in front of the lens is removed completely. That I can understand somewhat with eye length. But the contact sport part seems to be BS. Many military professionals get this surgery and never have a problem. I advise people to get LASIK as it has faster healing time than LASEK.

The US Military offers LASEK, LASIK, and PRK. It all depends on your eyes and which procedure would benefit you the most. I was recommended for PRK and got it done on Uncle Sam's dime, I have had zero problems and it's now been over four years since I had it done. My vision is still perfect.

Eye surgery doesn't exempt you from anything in the military at all. You can be a fighter pilot if you want to after the surgery and wouldn't be put at any disadvantage.

The US Military offers LASEK, LASIK, and PRK. It all depends on your eyes and which procedure would benefit you the most. I was recommended for PRK and got it done on Uncle Sam's dime, I have had zero problems and it's now been over four years since I had it done. My vision is still perfect.

Eye surgery doesn't exempt you from anything in the military at all. You can be a fighter pilot if you want to after the surgery and wouldn't be put at any disadvantage.

I know the Army prefers Soldiers get PRK over LASIK was my point. That's all.

Glad to hear it all went well. Did they do both eyes at the same time then?

I've always considered having it done, my eyes are pretty terrible. I used to wear contacts but now they just dry my eyes out so it's back to glasses :(

I'd have it done, but I don't like them cutting the flap open. Seen videos of it and it looks gruesome. I'll wait 10 years or so until you put your face up against a machine and it does it all in 30 seconds, without cutting anything.

c-TEN is all-laser. No physical touching of the eye at all. It's pretty new, I think.

I had surgery in 2005. Lost 0.25 in the right eye already. Astigmatism is kicking in too.

How old are you? Had your eyes stabilizied?

I had LASEK back in 2005. I was not a good candidate for LASIK (shape of my eye wasn't good enough for the flap or whatever) and wanted a quicker recovery time then PRK. I now have 20/18 vision and have very little side effects. I guess my only "complaint" would be my eyes are sometimes dry...but that is just grabbing at really nothing. I do not have the nighttime halo effects.

Hey, sounds like a friend. He had the thing where they didn't cut a flap, but just polished off the top area. His vision is nearly perfect, but not quite 20/20, and he tends to get dry eyes some nights. Also, the healing took longer than LASIK. I wonder if this is what a lot of people with the "better than LASIK" method are experiencing.

The RAF still has enough concerns that does not accept laser eye patients for airborne roles still.

IntraLasik is actually a treatment that is accepted even for fighter pilots. IntraLasic also cause the flap that is cut to be even thickness all across, while regular surgical lasic has flaps with thinner edges. IntraLasik also heals better and faster and don't thin out the flap so.

I wish I had 3.6k dollars to do this surgery....

I have horrible vision and need to wear contact lenses to drive. They are so costly. I pay $50 for 6 month supply but its more like 3 month supply since contacts always get ripped or lost in some way.

I'm 24. Prior to the surgery my eyes were stabilized for at least 4 years.

That's odd. If you are more than 20 and your eyes have been stable for a few years, it should definitely not be a problem. Maybe some people get problems anyway.

I wonder if it's possible to redo the surgery in the future at some point. At least if one didn't do LASIK but rather the thing where they don't need to cut a flap.

  • 3 months later...

You guys are hilarious! I had my LASIK done about 2 months ago and was terrified! Its really a lot of worry for nothing. The entire LASIK process takes only about 15 minutes and there's no pain whatsoever, it just feels a little weird when the suction cup sucks onto your eye. Afterward its just a little itchy for a while and you cant touch your eyes. I had mine done at a place called LASIK San Diego in case anyone is wondering.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!