can I connect to my University's VPN with the Windows 7 VPN feature?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Windows 7 has a VPN feature built in ("Set up a [...] VPN connection to your workplace") which asks me for an "internet address", a "destination name", an optional domain and username plus password.

I'm wondering if I could use this feature to connect to the VPN network of my University without any third party client. The VPN information that is given on the homepage of my University reads as follows:

VPN-Typ: Cisco IPSec mit VPN-Concentrator 3000 / CiscoASA

Gateway: vpn.mobile.unibas.ch

Use Perfect Forward Secrecy: neu: DH2 (alt: off)

Gruppenname: UniBasel-Access

Gruppenpassword f?r Nicht-Cisco-Clients: UniBasel

SA-lifetime: 1h

WINS und DNS erfragen: on

IKE: DH-1024, Gruppe2, 3DES-CBC, MD5 (alt: DH-768, Gruppe1, 3DES-CBC, MD5)

IP-Sec: ESPIP_3DES_SHA (alt: ESPIP_3DES_MD5-96)

Unfortunately I know close to nothing about VPN connections and so I would appreciate your advice, opinions or ideas.

thanks, G-Z

thanks for your answer.

yes, there is a Cisco client. But the information I posted above is meant for the use in other clients.

What I would like to know is, if it would be possible to use the native Windows 7 VPN client to access that network.

I can only agree with BudMan, MSVPN isn't great. Cisco VPN Client is great... and it works :)

Just ask the school for the PCF and the necessary VPN Client Installer... You need to ask for the installer unless you have a CCO which has a SMARTNet contract attached to it...

well, the Cisco client officially only supports Windows up to Vista. For Windows 7 I have to use a Java based browser solution.

It works but if there is the possibility to use native Windows functionality, I think it could be a better experience.

So you both agree that it isn't possible to use the VPN client built into Windows 7?

Not sure were you go the idea that was for other clients? If you are running a cisco based ipsec vpn, then you need a cisco client. No I do not believe the windows 7 client can connect. If so I would think there would be lots of info on doing it for starters. With all the issues you hear about a windows 7 compatible cisco client, etc. If it could connect without the client you would think that would be pretty big news.

I hear there is a 3rd party client that can work with cisco, they have a universal ipsec client http://www.ncp-e.com/

edit:

"the Cisco client officially only supports Windows up to Vista"

Where did you get this tidbit??

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/

The Cisco VPN Client supports:

* XP, Vista (x86/32-bit only), and Windows 7 (x86/32-bit only); Windows x64 (64-bit) support requires Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client

Like I said with the windows 7 issues that are all over the news about the cisco client support for windows 7 (64bit) Don't you think if you could connect with the built in client it would be fairly big news?? ;)

Edited by BudMan

Actually you should be able to connect with other clients like most VPN routers/firewalls. We provide Netscreen firewalls at work and the VPN Client for Netscreen isn't compatible with Windows 7 and probably won't be supported by Juniper for a long time.

We recommend Shrew VPN which works for Windows 7. I've just had a chat with a colleague who is in our Connectivity team (we supply Cisco and Zyxel routers) and he said give Shrew VPN a go and see if you can get that going:

The Shrew VPN Client software can be found at the following URL: http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn

Anyway hope that helps :)

The Shrew client is not the native built in vpn support now is it ;)

I also suggested a 3rd party client that will work.

There are always many ways to skin a cat ;)

Simple fact of life is...

If the school has a Cisco based VPN Server (ASA,PIX,VPN Conc whatever...) , I'd assume they have support etc which means they have access to the Cisco VPN Client, which you just need to ask them for.........

Why is this being made difficult?

also Shrew isn't native :/

EDIT:

Why are people suggesting the non-Cisco client when all he has to do is ask for that ? :|

I'm with Sn00py on this -- using some 3rd party client may or may not work for you.. But its going to be hard trying to get support from your school if your not using the client they provided. It would seem asinine for anyone to proved a cisco vpn connection for people to use without providing the client.

If the client they provide does not support your choice of OS - I would suggest you get with them on what your best option is. But it sounds like you already have a way to connect

"I have to use a Java based browser solution."

So what is your problem with the java based client? As already stated its not a native client -- but sure if you want you could try the shrew client, seems the latest version supports the import of the .pcf file that cisco clients use.. Does your school provide this file - they should.

2009-12-05

am pleased to announce the Shrew Soft VPN Client 2.1.5 Release is now available for download. This is a maintenance release that includes many critical bug fixes as well as minor feature enhancements. It is also the first to support the Windows 7 operating system. Compatibility for Cisco gateways has been improved and the ability to import PCF files has been added. The Windows OS installer has been improved to support both 32bit and 64bit operating systems in a single unified package. For a complete list of changes, please review the product documentation available on our website.

If your issue is with 64bit windows 7, I'm fairly sure you could also use XP mode for the cisco vpn client. But that would seem more complicated than just using the java based client your currently using.

wow, thanks a lot for all these responses! let's address some of the issues:

Why do I think that the Cisco client of my University does not support Windows 7?

Because the University Homepage says so. For Windows 7 there is, as I already mentioned, a Java based browser solution. This solution works so it's not as if I wouldn't have a way to connect to the VPN network. I once installed this Cisco client on Windows 7 back while it was still in beta and it completely crashed my system and I couldn't even boot it anymore after the installation. I know that there probably are solutions to this problem and it also might not exist anymore. But I would like to be careful.

Why di I think that the Information I posted is meant for third party VPN clients?

Because the University Homepage says so. But this information is the piece of support for any other VPN clients than the Cisco one. They officially don't support any third party solution.

What is this thread about?

1. I saw that there is a VPN solution built into Windows 7.

2. I wanted to ask if it is possible to access the VPN of my University with that Windows 7 solution.

I already asked this question to the support of my University but again the only support they give for third party clients is this information:

VPN-Typ: Cisco IPSec mit VPN-Concentrator 3000 / CiscoASA

Gateway: vpn.mobile.unibas.ch

Use Perfect Forward Secrecy: neu: DH2 (alt: off)

Gruppenname: UniBasel-Access

Gruppenpassword f?r Nicht-Cisco-Clients: UniBasel

SA-lifetime: 1h

WINS und DNS erfragen: on

IKE: DH-1024, Gruppe2, 3DES-CBC, MD5 (alt: DH-768, Gruppe1, 3DES-CBC, MD5)

IP-Sec: ESPIP_3DES_SHA (alt: ESPIP_3DES_MD5-96)

I hope I made things a bit more clear: 1. I'm not looking for a third party solution, 2. I'm not looking for a solution to any possible troubles with the Cisco client and 3. I have a solution to access the VPN - not a comfortable one, but it works. All I'm really looking for is a possible way to access the VPN through the native Windows 7 VPN system.

again, thanks a lot for your ideas!

And like I said if there was native support for windows 7 to connect to cisco vpn's info on it would be all over the place! ;) Cisco's late support for win7 and 64bit support has been a hot topic for quite some time.. If there was native support in windows 7 it would be huge news and there would be countless guides on how to set it up.

Your options are to use the client already provided - or use a 3rd party, or use a cisco client inside a VM (xp mode for example) if school only supplies an older client, or if your on 64bit.

That being said there is a cisco client that supports windows 7 (32bit) If you school has not provided it - thats on them on them. They are prob just to lazy to download it ;)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5699/ps2308/product_data_sheet0900aecd801a9de9.html

Features and Benefits

? Support for x86 (32-bit) XP, Vista (including SP1 & SP2), and Windows 7; Linux (Intel); Solaris (UltraSparc 32- and 64-bit); and Mac OS X 10.4 & 10.5.

post-14624-12653047221769_thumb.jpg

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client5006/release/notes/vpnclient5006.html#wp62415

Changes to Platforms Supported by this Release

VPN Client 5.0.06 features support on Microsoft Windows 7 (32-bit only).

This release does not support Microsoft Windows 2000 and Tablet PC 2004/2005, although it may work with these OSs.

If your not happy with your current method of connecting, I would suggest you urge your school to update the client they provide (if your using 7 32bit) or go with one of the 3rd party clients offered the ncp or shrew client.

alright, then I will use the Java solution which is recommended by my University for Windows7 and wait until they provide a Cisco client version which works under Windows 7 (at the moment they even warn about problems with Windows Vista so it is an old version of the Cisco client they use).

thanks a lot to all of you for your replies!

Question which I don't recall seeing answered - are you using 32 or 64 bit version of win7? If 64, I don't believe there will ever be a cisco client, they are moving toward the SSL based vpn and their anyclient vs ipsec based vpn. This requires new hardware and different licensing - so your school might not go that route for some time.

Your going to see more an more locations move to a SSL based I believe, since ipsec based can have issues for road warriors - depending on your location, restrictions on traffic, Nat, etc. you might not always be able to make a ipsec connection.. Its great for site to site, but as a road warrior solution it has its issues.

If you not happy with the java solution - you could try the shrew client, it is free ;) Works great, if not your out nothing but some time, etc.

Good Luck.

Fortunately I have Windows 7 with 32bit.

I wouldn't say that this Java based solution they provide is particularly bad. It is a bit slow, the URL of the pages is not visible which is kind of annoying and it is not very well integrated and feels sort of clumsy ... but it works and it does so with less problems than it would with the client.

Well I would ask them to download the latest client then.. Or if you know someone with a contract with cisco, they can download the client for you. Don't you have a buddy with your schools IT?? Good idea always make good with the IT guys ;) hehehe Buy them Beers is a good start.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!