can I connect to my University's VPN with the Windows 7 VPN feature?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Windows 7 has a VPN feature built in ("Set up a [...] VPN connection to your workplace") which asks me for an "internet address", a "destination name", an optional domain and username plus password.

I'm wondering if I could use this feature to connect to the VPN network of my University without any third party client. The VPN information that is given on the homepage of my University reads as follows:

VPN-Typ: Cisco IPSec mit VPN-Concentrator 3000 / CiscoASA

Gateway: vpn.mobile.unibas.ch

Use Perfect Forward Secrecy: neu: DH2 (alt: off)

Gruppenname: UniBasel-Access

Gruppenpassword f?r Nicht-Cisco-Clients: UniBasel

SA-lifetime: 1h

WINS und DNS erfragen: on

IKE: DH-1024, Gruppe2, 3DES-CBC, MD5 (alt: DH-768, Gruppe1, 3DES-CBC, MD5)

IP-Sec: ESPIP_3DES_SHA (alt: ESPIP_3DES_MD5-96)

Unfortunately I know close to nothing about VPN connections and so I would appreciate your advice, opinions or ideas.

thanks, G-Z

thanks for your answer.

yes, there is a Cisco client. But the information I posted above is meant for the use in other clients.

What I would like to know is, if it would be possible to use the native Windows 7 VPN client to access that network.

I can only agree with BudMan, MSVPN isn't great. Cisco VPN Client is great... and it works :)

Just ask the school for the PCF and the necessary VPN Client Installer... You need to ask for the installer unless you have a CCO which has a SMARTNet contract attached to it...

well, the Cisco client officially only supports Windows up to Vista. For Windows 7 I have to use a Java based browser solution.

It works but if there is the possibility to use native Windows functionality, I think it could be a better experience.

So you both agree that it isn't possible to use the VPN client built into Windows 7?

Not sure were you go the idea that was for other clients? If you are running a cisco based ipsec vpn, then you need a cisco client. No I do not believe the windows 7 client can connect. If so I would think there would be lots of info on doing it for starters. With all the issues you hear about a windows 7 compatible cisco client, etc. If it could connect without the client you would think that would be pretty big news.

I hear there is a 3rd party client that can work with cisco, they have a universal ipsec client http://www.ncp-e.com/

edit:

"the Cisco client officially only supports Windows up to Vista"

Where did you get this tidbit??

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/

The Cisco VPN Client supports:

* XP, Vista (x86/32-bit only), and Windows 7 (x86/32-bit only); Windows x64 (64-bit) support requires Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client

Like I said with the windows 7 issues that are all over the news about the cisco client support for windows 7 (64bit) Don't you think if you could connect with the built in client it would be fairly big news?? ;)

Edited by BudMan

Actually you should be able to connect with other clients like most VPN routers/firewalls. We provide Netscreen firewalls at work and the VPN Client for Netscreen isn't compatible with Windows 7 and probably won't be supported by Juniper for a long time.

We recommend Shrew VPN which works for Windows 7. I've just had a chat with a colleague who is in our Connectivity team (we supply Cisco and Zyxel routers) and he said give Shrew VPN a go and see if you can get that going:

The Shrew VPN Client software can be found at the following URL: http://www.shrew.net/download/vpn

Anyway hope that helps :)

The Shrew client is not the native built in vpn support now is it ;)

I also suggested a 3rd party client that will work.

There are always many ways to skin a cat ;)

Simple fact of life is...

If the school has a Cisco based VPN Server (ASA,PIX,VPN Conc whatever...) , I'd assume they have support etc which means they have access to the Cisco VPN Client, which you just need to ask them for.........

Why is this being made difficult?

also Shrew isn't native :/

EDIT:

Why are people suggesting the non-Cisco client when all he has to do is ask for that ? :|

I'm with Sn00py on this -- using some 3rd party client may or may not work for you.. But its going to be hard trying to get support from your school if your not using the client they provided. It would seem asinine for anyone to proved a cisco vpn connection for people to use without providing the client.

If the client they provide does not support your choice of OS - I would suggest you get with them on what your best option is. But it sounds like you already have a way to connect

"I have to use a Java based browser solution."

So what is your problem with the java based client? As already stated its not a native client -- but sure if you want you could try the shrew client, seems the latest version supports the import of the .pcf file that cisco clients use.. Does your school provide this file - they should.

2009-12-05

am pleased to announce the Shrew Soft VPN Client 2.1.5 Release is now available for download. This is a maintenance release that includes many critical bug fixes as well as minor feature enhancements. It is also the first to support the Windows 7 operating system. Compatibility for Cisco gateways has been improved and the ability to import PCF files has been added. The Windows OS installer has been improved to support both 32bit and 64bit operating systems in a single unified package. For a complete list of changes, please review the product documentation available on our website.

If your issue is with 64bit windows 7, I'm fairly sure you could also use XP mode for the cisco vpn client. But that would seem more complicated than just using the java based client your currently using.

wow, thanks a lot for all these responses! let's address some of the issues:

Why do I think that the Cisco client of my University does not support Windows 7?

Because the University Homepage says so. For Windows 7 there is, as I already mentioned, a Java based browser solution. This solution works so it's not as if I wouldn't have a way to connect to the VPN network. I once installed this Cisco client on Windows 7 back while it was still in beta and it completely crashed my system and I couldn't even boot it anymore after the installation. I know that there probably are solutions to this problem and it also might not exist anymore. But I would like to be careful.

Why di I think that the Information I posted is meant for third party VPN clients?

Because the University Homepage says so. But this information is the piece of support for any other VPN clients than the Cisco one. They officially don't support any third party solution.

What is this thread about?

1. I saw that there is a VPN solution built into Windows 7.

2. I wanted to ask if it is possible to access the VPN of my University with that Windows 7 solution.

I already asked this question to the support of my University but again the only support they give for third party clients is this information:

VPN-Typ: Cisco IPSec mit VPN-Concentrator 3000 / CiscoASA

Gateway: vpn.mobile.unibas.ch

Use Perfect Forward Secrecy: neu: DH2 (alt: off)

Gruppenname: UniBasel-Access

Gruppenpassword f?r Nicht-Cisco-Clients: UniBasel

SA-lifetime: 1h

WINS und DNS erfragen: on

IKE: DH-1024, Gruppe2, 3DES-CBC, MD5 (alt: DH-768, Gruppe1, 3DES-CBC, MD5)

IP-Sec: ESPIP_3DES_SHA (alt: ESPIP_3DES_MD5-96)

I hope I made things a bit more clear: 1. I'm not looking for a third party solution, 2. I'm not looking for a solution to any possible troubles with the Cisco client and 3. I have a solution to access the VPN - not a comfortable one, but it works. All I'm really looking for is a possible way to access the VPN through the native Windows 7 VPN system.

again, thanks a lot for your ideas!

And like I said if there was native support for windows 7 to connect to cisco vpn's info on it would be all over the place! ;) Cisco's late support for win7 and 64bit support has been a hot topic for quite some time.. If there was native support in windows 7 it would be huge news and there would be countless guides on how to set it up.

Your options are to use the client already provided - or use a 3rd party, or use a cisco client inside a VM (xp mode for example) if school only supplies an older client, or if your on 64bit.

That being said there is a cisco client that supports windows 7 (32bit) If you school has not provided it - thats on them on them. They are prob just to lazy to download it ;)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5743/ps5699/ps2308/product_data_sheet0900aecd801a9de9.html

Features and Benefits

? Support for x86 (32-bit) XP, Vista (including SP1 & SP2), and Windows 7; Linux (Intel); Solaris (UltraSparc 32- and 64-bit); and Mac OS X 10.4 & 10.5.

post-14624-12653047221769_thumb.jpg

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client5006/release/notes/vpnclient5006.html#wp62415

Changes to Platforms Supported by this Release

VPN Client 5.0.06 features support on Microsoft Windows 7 (32-bit only).

This release does not support Microsoft Windows 2000 and Tablet PC 2004/2005, although it may work with these OSs.

If your not happy with your current method of connecting, I would suggest you urge your school to update the client they provide (if your using 7 32bit) or go with one of the 3rd party clients offered the ncp or shrew client.

alright, then I will use the Java solution which is recommended by my University for Windows7 and wait until they provide a Cisco client version which works under Windows 7 (at the moment they even warn about problems with Windows Vista so it is an old version of the Cisco client they use).

thanks a lot to all of you for your replies!

Question which I don't recall seeing answered - are you using 32 or 64 bit version of win7? If 64, I don't believe there will ever be a cisco client, they are moving toward the SSL based vpn and their anyclient vs ipsec based vpn. This requires new hardware and different licensing - so your school might not go that route for some time.

Your going to see more an more locations move to a SSL based I believe, since ipsec based can have issues for road warriors - depending on your location, restrictions on traffic, Nat, etc. you might not always be able to make a ipsec connection.. Its great for site to site, but as a road warrior solution it has its issues.

If you not happy with the java solution - you could try the shrew client, it is free ;) Works great, if not your out nothing but some time, etc.

Good Luck.

Fortunately I have Windows 7 with 32bit.

I wouldn't say that this Java based solution they provide is particularly bad. It is a bit slow, the URL of the pages is not visible which is kind of annoying and it is not very well integrated and feels sort of clumsy ... but it works and it does so with less problems than it would with the client.

Well I would ask them to download the latest client then.. Or if you know someone with a contract with cisco, they can download the client for you. Don't you have a buddy with your schools IT?? Good idea always make good with the IT guys ;) hehehe Buy them Beers is a good start.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!