Recommended Posts

Seems like a pretty good idea; the purpose of life is to become a god, esentially.

Missed a few questions like asking about life after death (which I doubt.. hence his statement that we increase our lifespan).

Fiction or not, quite a nice read - especially considering that he stated that producing a model or program of the mind is an important next step and I'm currently reading a book called "How The Mind Works", which discusses exactly this. Fascinating stuff.

I've seen god dozens of times ;)

Morgan-Freeman-God.jpg

It's wierd, but when i picture god, i see Morgan Freeman... thank you * Almighty movies :p

So you mean god is black?

(I dont believe this story at all and I do not believe in god either)

BTW You didnt post text written below the story:

*******************************************

(If you've enjoyed this and, in particular if you're wondering why we didn't touch on the issue of "Life After Death",

you might like to try my play - Resurrection Part 1 - Primary Species)

(Discuss this Article)

This work is licensed by Harry Stottle(2000-05) under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

Also read: http://www.fullmoon.nu/book/chap.php?id=eagle1992 Similar.

Intresting? Very

Fake? Very

Google him as well. Nothing besides this article shows up.

I think its possible. I mean in no way does it say he IS god, just he created OUR universe. we will never know how our universe was created.

but I would have tried stabbing the dude. I mean I would go to jail. but damn, I would have to know if he was real.

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

I think its possible. I mean in no way does it say he IS god, just he created OUR universe. we will never know how our universe was created.

but I would have tried stabbing the dude. I mean I would go to jail. but damn, I would have to know if he was real.

I think a lot would. Lots of people try to antagonize god hoping he/she/it will smite them, thus prove his/hers/its existence. Says a lot about the nature of Man.

The problem with the whole thing is this:

The person\god mentions that humans need to let go of the whole religion thing and stop trying to live up or like god itself. It mentions that religious people are living too far in the past by believing in such things as the Bible or Qu'ran.

The interesting thing is, he later mentions that this will be posted on the web and people will only begin to believe it once we make the advances in technology etc that he discusses... Meaning, he WANTS us to believe in the writting? Meaning that this writting at some point could be seen, again, as a religious text, then placing us many years behind his idea of evolution, because people then begin religion focused on the fact that this discussion was indeed, actually with god itself...

Would that not make the whole thing a contradiction of itself?

Its an interesting read and sounds like a lot of thought has gone in to its writting, however, its one of those things that, unless it happens to you or in front of you; your bound not to believe it...

Sounds more like a 'Q' than a God (Star Trek FTW).

Exactly what I was thinking when I started to read the text.

It was "ok for awhile till the "thinking machine" and then I couldnt stop laughing. btw, you cant take this text seriously?, can you?.

The other text from the page are similar to this one. All pointed to evolution/machines/hippism

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

idiot. nuff said.

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

Seriously get the hell off your high horse. Nobody on the internet cares about what you think of them and your only going to incite bad attitudes going around "generalizing" people. If they want to choose to believe this thing then its their own damn choice to do so. The time to realize you know very little is when you think you know it all.

The problem with the whole thing is this:

The person\god mentions that humans need to let go of the whole religion thing and stop trying to live up or like god itself. It mentions that religious people are living too far in the past by believing in such things as the Bible or Qu'ran.

The interesting thing is, he later mentions that this will be posted on the web and people will only begin to believe it once we make the advances in technology etc that he discusses... Meaning, he WANTS us to believe in the writting? Meaning that this writting at some point could be seen, again, as a religious text, then placing us many years behind his idea of evolution, because people then begin religion focused on the fact that this discussion was indeed, actually with god itself...

Would that not make the whole thing a contradiction of itself?

Its an interesting read and sounds like a lot of thought has gone in to its writting, however, its one of those things that, unless it happens to you or in front of you; your bound not to believe it...

That is a very good point Rich, it's almost as if he is telling us religious texts are pointless but wait till mine becomes one and then take it seriously. As I said in my original post this has got a few inconsistencies but its very intelligent nonetheless.

To the dude that said he would stab the guy I think that's a very pointless action as surely this "God" which claimed he had evolved into a higher state of being meaning not of flesh would have a temporary body of flesh in order to be able to communicate with another human and not scare him etc. Meaning you would be able to kill his temporary body but do no damage to him as a "deity"...

Seriously get the hell off your high horse. Nobody on the internet cares about what you think of them and your only going to incite bad attitudes going around "generalizing" people. If they want to choose to believe this thing then its their own damn choice to do so. The time to realize you know very little is when you think you know it all.

Indeed, here's me getting off my high horse.

Your turn.

Missed a few questions like asking about life after death (which I doubt.. hence his statement that we increase our lifespan).

Seeing that God in this case took the form of a human, then I'm sure it's fair to assume that he's a being of energy? I think personally that humans are beings of energy as well, meaning that, when physical bodies cease to function the energy is simply displaced; whether or not that energy retains intelligence or anything, I have no clue. Anyways, I think it means prolonging our life in our physical bodies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!