Recommended Posts

Seems like a pretty good idea; the purpose of life is to become a god, esentially.

Missed a few questions like asking about life after death (which I doubt.. hence his statement that we increase our lifespan).

Fiction or not, quite a nice read - especially considering that he stated that producing a model or program of the mind is an important next step and I'm currently reading a book called "How The Mind Works", which discusses exactly this. Fascinating stuff.

I've seen god dozens of times ;)

Morgan-Freeman-God.jpg

It's wierd, but when i picture god, i see Morgan Freeman... thank you * Almighty movies :p

So you mean god is black?

(I dont believe this story at all and I do not believe in god either)

BTW You didnt post text written below the story:

*******************************************

(If you've enjoyed this and, in particular if you're wondering why we didn't touch on the issue of "Life After Death",

you might like to try my play - Resurrection Part 1 - Primary Species)

(Discuss this Article)

This work is licensed by Harry Stottle(2000-05) under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

Also read: http://www.fullmoon.nu/book/chap.php?id=eagle1992 Similar.

Intresting? Very

Fake? Very

Google him as well. Nothing besides this article shows up.

I think its possible. I mean in no way does it say he IS god, just he created OUR universe. we will never know how our universe was created.

but I would have tried stabbing the dude. I mean I would go to jail. but damn, I would have to know if he was real.

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

I think its possible. I mean in no way does it say he IS god, just he created OUR universe. we will never know how our universe was created.

but I would have tried stabbing the dude. I mean I would go to jail. but damn, I would have to know if he was real.

I think a lot would. Lots of people try to antagonize god hoping he/she/it will smite them, thus prove his/hers/its existence. Says a lot about the nature of Man.

The problem with the whole thing is this:

The person\god mentions that humans need to let go of the whole religion thing and stop trying to live up or like god itself. It mentions that religious people are living too far in the past by believing in such things as the Bible or Qu'ran.

The interesting thing is, he later mentions that this will be posted on the web and people will only begin to believe it once we make the advances in technology etc that he discusses... Meaning, he WANTS us to believe in the writting? Meaning that this writting at some point could be seen, again, as a religious text, then placing us many years behind his idea of evolution, because people then begin religion focused on the fact that this discussion was indeed, actually with god itself...

Would that not make the whole thing a contradiction of itself?

Its an interesting read and sounds like a lot of thought has gone in to its writting, however, its one of those things that, unless it happens to you or in front of you; your bound not to believe it...

Sounds more like a 'Q' than a God (Star Trek FTW).

Exactly what I was thinking when I started to read the text.

It was "ok for awhile till the "thinking machine" and then I couldnt stop laughing. btw, you cant take this text seriously?, can you?.

The other text from the page are similar to this one. All pointed to evolution/machines/hippism

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

idiot. nuff said.

This just shows how.. gullible (for lack of a better word) you people are, of course some genuinely enjoyed this story and understood that it's fiction, yet I can see that some people took it seriously. I'm afraid that even Atheists took it somewhat seriously...

Shows how a pretty story can make you believe anything it says, a burning bush ? Oh cool ! A conversation with God ? Awesome !

Get real, it's just as fiction as the Bible/whatever.

I won't go into nitpicking mode, but please stop with the supportive comments about how cool God is, you might as well bitch about Bloody Marry and how she killed your cat last night, go to a ****ing Asylum.

Edit: This is a generalization, please no comments about "I didn't say X" "I said Y, actually" or "I agree but Z"

Seriously get the hell off your high horse. Nobody on the internet cares about what you think of them and your only going to incite bad attitudes going around "generalizing" people. If they want to choose to believe this thing then its their own damn choice to do so. The time to realize you know very little is when you think you know it all.

The problem with the whole thing is this:

The person\god mentions that humans need to let go of the whole religion thing and stop trying to live up or like god itself. It mentions that religious people are living too far in the past by believing in such things as the Bible or Qu'ran.

The interesting thing is, he later mentions that this will be posted on the web and people will only begin to believe it once we make the advances in technology etc that he discusses... Meaning, he WANTS us to believe in the writting? Meaning that this writting at some point could be seen, again, as a religious text, then placing us many years behind his idea of evolution, because people then begin religion focused on the fact that this discussion was indeed, actually with god itself...

Would that not make the whole thing a contradiction of itself?

Its an interesting read and sounds like a lot of thought has gone in to its writting, however, its one of those things that, unless it happens to you or in front of you; your bound not to believe it...

That is a very good point Rich, it's almost as if he is telling us religious texts are pointless but wait till mine becomes one and then take it seriously. As I said in my original post this has got a few inconsistencies but its very intelligent nonetheless.

To the dude that said he would stab the guy I think that's a very pointless action as surely this "God" which claimed he had evolved into a higher state of being meaning not of flesh would have a temporary body of flesh in order to be able to communicate with another human and not scare him etc. Meaning you would be able to kill his temporary body but do no damage to him as a "deity"...

Seriously get the hell off your high horse. Nobody on the internet cares about what you think of them and your only going to incite bad attitudes going around "generalizing" people. If they want to choose to believe this thing then its their own damn choice to do so. The time to realize you know very little is when you think you know it all.

Indeed, here's me getting off my high horse.

Your turn.

Missed a few questions like asking about life after death (which I doubt.. hence his statement that we increase our lifespan).

Seeing that God in this case took the form of a human, then I'm sure it's fair to assume that he's a being of energy? I think personally that humans are beings of energy as well, meaning that, when physical bodies cease to function the energy is simply displaced; whether or not that energy retains intelligence or anything, I have no clue. Anyways, I think it means prolonging our life in our physical bodies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!