Conan's 'Tonight Show' contract revealed


Recommended Posts

If there was one big mystery in the Great Late-Night Fiasco of 2010, it was whether NBC actually specified in Conan O'Brien's contract that "The Tonight Show" had to begin at 11:35 p.m. This seemingly small detail was of crucial importance to O'Brien, who ended up exiting the network rather than accepting NBC's offer to move him and "Tonight" to 12:05 a.m. -- a potential violation of his deal, which was never made public.

But we've finally tracked down a copy of the O'Brien contract, and -- lo and behold -- NBC did define "Tonight" as the series that airs at 11:35 as far back as 2002. However, what may have emboldened NBC to move the program anyway was the absence of that key language from later amendments to the deal.

Here's the backstory:

The 2002 timeslot language was part of an amendment to O'Brien's first contract with NBC, which dated back to his 1993 hiring as host of "Late Night." The provision stipulated that if Jay Leno ever left, O'Brien would be installed as host of "Tonight," which is described as the "series that airs at 11:35."

The phrase itself is not only a pretty damning indication of the legal leverage the O'Brien camp held over NBC to extract his hefty $37.5 million-plus settlement, but reveals another new wrinkle in the GLNF2010: The 2002 timing means O'Brien had been waiting seven years for "Tonight," not the five-year span that is generally reported (for those of you scoring at home).

Moreover, in his original deal to host "Late Night," that show is described as the "second network series after the end of primetime."

Case closed, right? Not exactly. As is common, O'Brien's deal was modified several times. In a 2004 amendment to the deal -- the one that officially promised O'Brien he'd get "Tonight" after a five-year waiting period -- there's no mention of the timeslot.

Insiders familiar with settlement negotiations say NBC jumped on that fact to argue that the "operative" deal was silent on the timeslot issue and even contained some NBC profit-participation boilerplate allowing NBC discretion to move shows as it chooses.

One problem with that argument: Any lawyer worth his 5% commission knows you've got to read an amended contract in the context of all other prenegotiated elements. O'Brien's 2004 deal incorporated by reference and ratified all the terms of his prior deals -- including the "Tonight Show" definition -- and says any conflicts between NBC's standard terms and the negotiated terms are governed by what's been negotiated.

NBC countered that if the 11:35 timeslot was so important to Conan, his team should have thought to put it in the 2004 amendment -- the one that actually gave O'Brien the show. But Team Coco's response was that they didn't have to. The show was already defined in the deal and was an established institution that had aired directly after the local news for decades.

The differing contractual language may also explain the choice of words NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker used in his Jan 18 interview with PBS' Charlie Rose, Zucker's only public comments on the case. Asked by Rose whether O'Brien's deal defined when "Tonight" would air, Zucker paused and said: "In Conan's current [emphasis ours] contract, there is no guarantee of timeslot for 'The Tonight Show.'"

There were other sticking points in the tense negotiations between O'Brien's team -- led by litigator Patty Glaser, deal lawyer Leigh Brecheen (who had also worked on David Letterman's deal to move from NBC to CBS), agent Rick Rosen and manager Gavin Polone -- and the NBC crew led by execs Marc Graboff, Jeff Gaspin and Andrea Hartman and litigator Scott Edelman with a team from Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.

NBC argued that O'Brien would have trouble proving his damages in court beyond what NBC owed him on his contract. But Team Coco had a nice bit of language in its favor in the 2004 deal, which expressly discusses what Conan gave up in order to wait around for "The Tonight Show." According to the contract, O'Brien "could earn more than double the contracted salary for ["Late Night"] if [O'Brien] were to enter into a contract with a third party at this time." Instead, he gave up that increased money to rely on the promise of a move to the 11:35 "Tonight Show." That language likely would have made it easier for Glaser to paint a picture of a host who sacrificed millions to wait for a show that NBC attempted to materially change.

With whom would an arbitrator or jury have agreed? We'll never know, and both sides say they're happy with O'Brien's settlement of $32.5 million, plus $5 million for executive producer Jeff Ross and additional money for the show's 140 staff members (O'Brien paid a lot of that out of his own pocket).

But given that O'Brien's team got him the big payday, plus the right to look for another job immediately, plus no mitigation or offset damages from any new salary, the settlement suggests NBC was more than a little afraid of how this might play out -- and that Conan's "Tonight" deal wasn't the weak contract NBC wanted us to believe it was.

http://www.thresq.co...t-revealed.html

I'm looking forward to his next show whenever that may be. In the meantime I'll watch Jay slowly burn when he returns. What a crappy last show he had. Conan went out amazing. Loved his final Late Night and Tonight Show. Coco, king of late night :D

^ He'd have to be on at 12, he wouldn't want to screw with Daily/Colbert as they are all good friends. Although that'd be a killer lineup, those 2 then Conan at the end. Plus he could keep it more focused on comedy and improvisation, unlike Jay who needs cue cards to remember to breath. If I had to pick one thing I hated about his new show was that everything was so damn scripted. It was really evident when Kimmel was on, like **** Jay, can you say anything without reading it first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, this is absolutely nothing new and EA have done it before. Burnout Paradise, released in 2008, had dynamic advertising billboards that were updated via the internet and targeted people based on location and what EA knew about them from their profile. It was particularly notable for the fact that the Obama presidential campaign ran ads in the game, in an attempt to reach a younger audience who didn't watch broadcast TV any more. It was by no means the first though. Battlefield 2142 from 2006 had the same thing. In fact, Neowin wrote a story about it back then. https://www.neowin.net/news/ba...-in-game-ads-clarification/
    • This is obviously aimed at the education where Apple has lost so much ground to Chromebooks in the last few years, but unless they come up with a comparable management system for education why would anyone switch back?
    • Here's how we arrived at that claim: Note that this is just Play Store downloads. The app is also available on the Galaxy App Store
    • Google Play states the app had more than 50 million downloads. What other metric do you suggest should be used?
    • MSN defined our generation in some ways, kind of like Snapchat and TikTok have done for future generations. I have great memories of the MSN era in the late 90s / early 2000s. In the UK everyone seemed to come home from School and go on MSN for the evening. We didn't really have mobile phones then, so other than going and knocking on your friends door it was a totally new way of interacting with people. I also loved how I could talk to people I’d met playing online games from around the world. Inviting people to NetMeeting and messing about with the shared white board and webcams was pretty fun, even if webcams only ran at a couple of fps over dial-up. All the random things you could do with MsgPlus! were really fun - I suspect that made a few people jump with /shello randomly blasting Mr Hankey out their speakers! Maybe I’m just nostalgic, however I do feel the internet and computers were more fun back then.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      531
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      205
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      neufuse
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!