Weird connected computer showing up in Finder


Recommended Posts

Okay, I've noticed an unknown computer showing up in my Finder on my and my girlfriend's Macbooks.

I've determined that I can hide it by deselecting bonjour computers from finder's advanced preferences. I have used "Get Info" on the computer and determined that its a "PC server" according to that. I have double and triple checked the MAC address of every single device on my router, only my devices are showing up under the DHCP Table on my WRT54G2 router (two Macbooks, one iPod Touch, and one Xbox 360). I have always had a secure network, and recently even redid the security to make sure (WPA2 security, non-broadcasted SSID). I am running completely up to date Snow Leopard on my Macbook and my girlfriend is running up to date Leopard on hers.

Here's a screenshot of my default Finder window showing the mystery computer:

screenshot20100217at124.png

Here is a screenshot of the "Get Info" dialogue window from the mystery computer:

screenshot20100217at101.png

What in the world is this computer, and aside from just hiding "Bonjour computers" from Finder, how can I kick this thing out of here?

  On 17/02/2010 at 15:55, Shaun_ said:

Someone on your network, Is it a shared connection?

Well I my network has always been secured. And I've recently changed my wireless security settings: I turned off broadcast of my SSID, I made a much more complicated passkey, and I enabled MAC Address Filtering (I've always had WPA 2 Personal turned on).

If I connect my Macbook directly to the router via cables & disable Airport on my Mac, I won't see that mystery computer. I'm fairly certain that its not someone on my network, as I drastically changed my security settings and I never see this mystery computer on my router's DHCP Table. Here's a screenshot of that right now, the three computers listed are my Macbook, my girlfriend's Macbook, and my iPod Touch:

screenshot20100217at123.png

  On 17/02/2010 at 17:40, Rcp said:

I've noticed that on my Mac. If I don't setup the workgroup it would pick up any surrounding PC's. Maybe try that and see how it goes?

I'll freely admit I am a newb at Macs (only been a full time Mac user for a year), but I thought Workgroups were a PC only thing and I don't have any PC computers on my secure network. If that is the case, how do I change the Workgroup on my Mac?

  On 17/02/2010 at 22:18, BudMan said:

Well not sure where you got "pc server" info from? From that mac address its a apple branded device

http://www.coffer.co.../?string=0017f2

That's actually really cool that you can look that up. I got that "PC Server" thing from using "Get Info" off the right click context menu on that device from Finder (I screenie'd it in my first post).

As an update, though, I called Apple and they stated that it was probably a Windows 7 PC located on the same subnet from my ISP. They stated it was Windows 7 because they said it simply has a stronger online presence and it was nothing to worry about.

  On 17/02/2010 at 23:58, Juski814 said:

As an update, though, I called Apple and they stated that it was probably a Windows 7 PC located on the same subnet from my ISP. They stated it was Windows 7 because they said it simply has a stronger online presence and it was nothing to worry about.

Sounds like he knows alot!!

yeah a windows 7 PC with mac of apple interface? Does that sound right to you?

Stronger online presence? Um your behind a NAT router - so why would you being seeing machines that are connected to the same ISP as you? None of that makes any sense. If that was the case -- why are you not see MORE of them? If your seeing machines connected to your ISP, you would be seeing a lot more than 1 ;)

I get this sometimes. I've noticed that my iMac turns into a "PC" icon when the machine itself is on and connected to the network (its connected printers and hard drives are available over the network), but it's in a sleep/low power mode. But once I actually power it back up, the icon changes back to the familiar iMac icon.

  On 18/02/2010 at 15:31, BudMan said:

yeah a windows 7 PC with mac of apple interface? Does that sound right to you?

Stronger online presence? Um your behind a NAT router - so why would you being seeing machines that are connected to the same ISP as you? None of that makes any sense. If that was the case -- why are you not see MORE of them? If your seeing machines connected to your ISP, you would be seeing a lot more than 1 ;)

Oh I agree, it sounds absolutely retarded. It honestly sounded like he couldn't care less about my issue despite my giving him as much information as possible.

Well thanks for all the help guys, but I seem to have figured this out myself. My girlfriend had Printer Sharing enabled on her computer (which was supposed to be on) and for whatever reason that also creates that "mac0017f22b93a7" computer to show up as well... since +BudMan pointed out that the address was from Apple Computer, Inc. I assume that its just something her Mac is creating.

Which makes me wonder why the guy I called from Apple was so far off on this one... :huh: anyways, thanks for all the input guys, much appreciated.

  On 18/02/2010 at 21:37, Creamy said:

Hihi! Nice CRT! :cool:

Also, I found that icon quite humorous as well.

Yeah those so called "geniuses" at the genius bar -- yeah not so much ;)

I don't even own a mac, and get a fair share of side jobs from people that the geniuses couldn't help.. hehehe

  On 18/02/2010 at 15:31, BudMan said:

yeah a windows 7 PC with mac of apple interface? Does that sound right to you?

Maybe an Intel Mac running Windows 7? The easy way to figure out what computer (or device) is causing it would be to find out the MAC addresses of all of the devices on your network and see which one matches the name that is showing up. Also, remember that your ethernet and Airport connections will have different MAC addresses, so look at both of them on each of your computers.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've set since XP - Best performance in the Performance settings. 11 included. I enable only the show shadows after that, so I can see better fonts and mouse.. But hardly I can say I can see a difference today.
    • Yeah this kinda means nothing to me if it's going to be the same mess as HDMI 2.1 where it was difficult to know what features you were getting. It was way too confusing, designed to fool us into thinking we was getting something better with the higher number when a lot of the times we didn't get anything better because companies can add and remove features at will, which if that is the case for 2.2, then who cares lol.
    • Someone wrote a script to block 'brainrot' content online using an $8 smart plug by Usama Jawad Original image via Neil Chen Many people use smart plugs nowadays due to the various advantages they offer, including automation, integration with mobile software, increased home security, better energy efficiency, and compatibility with other smart products. However, a smart plug customer has gone a step further by enhancing their hardware in a way that it blocks them from viewing "brainrot" content online, or any website, for that matter. As seen in a popular thread over on Hacker News, a person known as "NWChen" has written a script that connects to the $8 Kasa Smart Wi-Fi Plug Mini and utilizes it to restrict access to websites of your choice. In essence, this plug then acts as a physical switch that you can toggle to visit certain websites. NWChen's main motivation behind this initiative was to avoid brainrot, with examples listed as X (formerly known as Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and Reddit in their blog post. In terms of technical functionality, the smart plug connects to Wi-Fi (obviously) and hosts a physical switch that can be used to turn it on and off. NWChen's script connects to the smart plug via an API and then polls its state. If it's on, websites of your choice get restricted and you can't open them anymore, until you physically get up and turn off the plug, or remove the website from you blocklist. NWChen has recommended plugging in the hardware far away from you so there is sufficient resistance in turning off the plug. In the thread, many have praised this invention, believing that the nature of this mechanism provides enough hurdles where you'd rather just not visit the problematic websites anymore. However, some have noted that "those without self control cannot be trusted if they hold the switch". Some have also highlighted a problem where a user can simply stop the script's execution without much friction. Overall, it's a fairly interesting setup, even if it's fairly rudimentary in nature. Configuring this physical block with a Kasa smart plug is fairly easy. You can simply download the script from the laptop-brick GitHub project here, install it, get the IP address of your smart plug, and then use it when you're executing the script. You can modify the blocklist using a dedicated file present inside the GitHub project.
    • We'll probably mirror the EU rule, we've done that in many other areas, but if we don't, well we can add this as another reason why Brexit shouldn't have happened. Personally, if I started to get ads in WhatsApp, that would be a big incentive for me to want to switch to an alternative, and I doubt it will be difficult for me to get my contacts to change as well.
    • It reminds me of fossil fuels, as they try to push the price up and renewable energy continues to get better and cheaper, it's putting the squeeze on the fossil fuel industry. In this case, bringing jobs back to modern countries with higher wages would be a big incentive for corporations to remove humans from the workforce and replace them with AI and robotics, and the funny thing is about that, consumers will demand it because they want things cheaper not more expensive, also corporations will be forced to do it if they want to survive against others that go that route. At the end of the day, they didn't pick cheap labour because they wanted to do so, they did so because competition forced companies to do so, bringing jobs back to western countries would make these companies less competitive on the world stage, unless they use a lot more AI and robotics to remove a lot of humans from the workforce. With that said, bringing jobs back to more stable regions and using AI and robotics does have the benefit of reducing the risk of political trade wars and tariffs, but let's forget this idea of jobs coming back home to higher paying wages, that idea is dead in the water with the advancement of AI and robotics, and with humans, it would only end up making a lot more things more expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Miguel Batista earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      moojay67 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      urbanmopdubai1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Johnny Mrkvička earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      654
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      230
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      220
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      151
    5. 5
      Xenon
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!