Recommended Posts

I'm thinking each episode needs to be 2hrs :)

  • Like 2

Yeah I figured as much. I still really enjoy the show and wait patiently for it every Sunday. The thing is at the pace they go, it's going to have to go at least 10 seasons to start to come together isn't it?

S1 = Book 1

S2 = Book 2

S3&S4 = Book 3

Books 4&5 take place concurrently ... so I'd imagine 3 seasons to cover them. Then 6&7 (and possibly more, depending on how much GRRM writes) are still being written, so who knows how they will be split. But thats 7 seasons just to get to what exists now.

S1 = Book 1

S2 = Book 2

S3&S4 = Book 3

Books 4&5 take place concurrently ... so I'd imagine 3 seasons to cover them. Then 6&7 (and possibly more, depending on how much GRRM writes) are still being written, so who knows how they will be split. But thats 7 seasons just to get to what exists now.

No way that's happening, and we should all be glad because that would be the death of the show if they did it that way.

Imagine seeing Daenerys f*cking about in Meeren for three years, after the buildup she gets this season? They'd get canceled before you can say it.

The way I see it, AFFC and ADWD combined will offer two seasons max, and I'd go as far as saying they should try and be done with all existing material by the end of season 5.

Season 4: Remainder of Book 3, at least one plotline lifted from AFFC:

Kingsmoot, which takes place parallel to ASOS anyway

, possibly even more, as some characters will be running out of ASOS storylines as soon as this season's end

(Bran comes to mind).

Season 5: Compress most of the remaining AFFC/ADWD material.

Season 6: Whatever's left of AFFC/ADWD, start with TWOW material.

Show runners have already mentioned they're aiming for 8 seasons max, and I think that would be amazing. As the story picks up faster and faster each season, it would be smart not to drag it out and use the momentum it builds up. No matter how good a show is, after a while it risks an audience decline, especially with complex material like this, and some obvious flaws in later books (introducing major characters in book 5? WTF?), and right now they're in the once in a life time position to tell a perfect story (assuming TWOW and ADOS get back to the quality set by first three books) and actually improve in one huge area where the last two books suffered: pace. Btw, they've mentioned in a recent interview they're going with the story regardless if GRRM finishes the books or not, as they're familiar with major storylines.

Show runners have already mentioned they're aiming for 8 seasons max, and I think that would be amazing. As the story picks up faster and faster each season, it would be smart not to drag it out and use the momentum it builds up. No matter how good a show is, after a while it risks an audience decline, especially with complex material like this, and some obvious flaws in later books (introducing major characters in book 5? WTF?), and right now they're in the once in a life time position to tell a perfect story (assuming TWOW and ADOS get back to the quality set by first three books) and actually improve in one huge area where the last two books suffered: pace. Btw, they've mentioned in a recent interview they're going with the story regardless if GRRM finishes the books or not, as they're familiar with major storylines.

Agree, i hate it when Shows are supposed to End after Season X and later on they decide to extend it because it is a huge Success.

Hope the will do the same with True Blood; every good Story Needs a good End :)

''Choas isn't a pit, chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail, never get to try it again. The fall breaks them. And some are given a chance to climb, they refuse, they cling to the realm, or the gods, or love... illusions. Only the ladder is real, the climb is all there is''

Freakin amazing.

I wouldn't go that far, but it has been probably the weakest episode of the season. No need for set-ups this far off in the show. Besides the bear-pit scene and Dany's scene (which was the highlight), not much was crucial to the plot and could've easily been left out or moved to the next episode.

I guess it's one of the problems of the adaptation, you either leave out too much, or you have to draw it out (depending if you go the entire book vs half the book adaptation route).

I think the episode will work much better on repeated viewings or as part of the entire season, though. Waiting a week and knowing you have to wait another week is what kills it.

Game of Thrones producer Frank Vogler has revealed that he expects the show to span seven seasons.

George RR Martin has penned five novels in his Song of Ice and Fire series - which serve as the basis for the HBO drama - with two more planned.

"[The total number of seasons] is being discussed as we speak," Vogler explained at the BAFTA Television Awards (May 12).

"The third season was the first half of book three, season four will be the second part of book three. George RR Martin has written books four and five; six and seven are pending.

"I would hope that, if we all survive, and if the audience stays with us we'll probably get through to seven seasons."

Game of Thrones won the BAFTA Audience Award at Sunday night's ceremony, with Vogler claiming that defining the show's appeal is "impossible".

"I think the quality of the writing is superb, I think the character drama is first-rate and I think the mix of reality with the fantasy elements is pretty intoxicating," he suggested.

The third season of Game of Thrones is currently airing on HBO in the US and on Sky Atlantic in the UK, with a fourth run already confirmed.

Great episode, especially compared to the last one.

What I absolutely hated is how the show basically ruined Sansa. It's like half her brain is suddenly gone. Season 2 did a great job establishing she's starting to cope with the reality of things and growing as a character (getting educated by the Hound, even taking jabs at Joffrey and Tyrion in the Blackwater episode). I honestly can't believe they changed the scene when Tyrion cloaks her. She refuses to kneel down in the books, and it's the only bit of defiance she can afford in a situation where everything she does is dictated by others. It was a great character moment. In this episode, she was basically willing to undress for him. It's like season 2 never happened. I also don't understand the need for whitewashing Tyrion so much, I mean, he's basically flawless right now. Wasn't he likeable enough as it is?

Everything else was pretty great, though. The Hound and Arya are the new roadtrip buddy comedy duo, Davos reading was adorable, they nailed it with the choice of actor for Daario, and the last scene was amazing.

Excellent episode. A definite improvement over the last one. Tyrion rocks (Y)

She refuses to kneel down in the books, and it's the only bit of defiance she can afford in a situation where everything she does is dictated by others. It was a great character moment. In this episode, she was basically willing to undress for him. It's like season 2 never happened.

Maybe she's accepted the fact that she will never get out of King' Landing, and might as well play along. That can be associated with the fact that she didn't go with Littlefinger earlier.

^She refused to go with Littlefinger while she still believed she was to marry Loras. As if that wasn't naive enough. But I can't believe they made her go from being rightfully devastated that she was about to marry Tyrion, to pretty whatever about it, after one conversation with Marg. That's season 1 stupidity right there. She's been ruined by writing choices this season.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!