Recommended Posts

Hmm.. I don't have a cable and download everything in SD due to ###### internet bandwidth restrictions.. so the quality is spot on for what I normally watch.

Also.  checking out the first episode (on my pc) it is nice and clear.  Can see everything that is happening, no artifacts, no lag.  Nice crisp clean video.  

Downloaded them, watched the first 10 minutes, and stopped and deleted them. 

Quality is subpar (looks like a 360p rip) and although clear, took away from the experience immensely. 

100% would recommend NOT downloading these. As commented earlier it doesnt do the show justice.

For those without cable or low internet caps... I would 100% recommend downloading them.  Good quality, clear audio.. I see nothing wrong with them.

  • Like 2

For those without cable or low internet caps... I would 100% recommend downloading them.  Good quality, clear audio.. I see nothing wrong with them.

 

it is very noticeable for the first 10-15 minutes for me (since i watch stuff at 720p normally as 1080p is too large)

but then you get used it, and it becomes fine to watch.  depends on how picky you are.    just sit further from the screen, and it is not as noticeable.

 

still, i highly recommend watching in HD !  since, while the main characters show fine,  the magnificent background views are really watched out.

Watched the 4 leaked episodes. I'm usually very anal about quality but the SD rip was perfectly watchable. It's not like your missing anything plot wise, just the quality of the picture.

Then again, I'll be re-watching them all in 1080p once they're out. Awesome 4 episodes! Really good so far.

  • Like 2

Found the premiere rather lame to be honest, with corny scenes like Sansa passing by Brienne and the bedroom scene between Daario and Dany which had porn level dialogue quality (to mention a few).

 

You should watch listen to porn dialoge more often. You would get a better perspective on how much, MUCH, MUCH better the writing on "Game of Thrones" is. :)

  • Like 3

You should watch listen to porn dialoge more often. You would get a better perspective on how much, MUCH, MUCH better the writing on "Game of Thrones" is. :)

very true.   there is only a handful of movies with dialog that can actually be used in real life.    

Talk Dirty to Me from 1980 is one such movie.  in case you are interested ;)

it is funny and it is corny, but if you can pull it of confidently it actually works on women.

Found the premiere rather lame to be honest, with corny scenes like Sansa passing by Brienne and the bedroom scene between Daario and Dany which had porn level dialogue quality (to mention a few).

premier episodes are almost always lame or boring, it's all setting up the storyline. Episode 2 is much better

 

 

You should watch listen to porn dialoge more often. You would get a better perspective on how much, MUCH, MUCH better the writing on "Game of Thrones" is. :)

porn has .... dialog?

You should watch listen to porn dialoge more often. You would get a better perspective on how much, MUCH, MUCH better the writing on "Game of Thrones" is. :)

With the show runners going off the rails, I'm sure the show will provide plenty of that:

 

"- That's why I have the Unsullied patrolling the streets.

- Anyone with a chest full of gold can buy an army of Unsullied. You're not the Mother of Unsullied. You're the Mother of Dragons."

 

And how about Mance's O faces.

  • Like 1

the 4 episodes did not catch me. my fault or does the season start a little lame?

 

i really enjoyed them.  while parts were slow, overall tone was just what i expected and wanted.

did you enjoy previous season?

if could be your mood, and the fact that you binged them in low quality too.

 

 

some parts this episodes, i had to rewind and watch a couple more times, that how awesome they were.  and those parts are enough to keep watching the rest of slow bits.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!