Recommended Posts

Thinking about watching the leaked episodes now. The first two were just too boring and could have be done in one.

Starting way too slow :(

 

I'll never understand those comments. It's the same every seasons.

 

It's GoT ... you should know by now than GoT seasons are like a book. It's not like your average TV series where all sodes need to finish with a cliff hanger and have explosions all over the place.

 

In every GoT season there's an introduction, rising actions, climax, falling actions and a conclusion. Since there's multiple seasons the conclusion prepares the next season and is not a proper conclusion.

 

After 2 sodes you are still in the exposition/introduction. Nothing is actually supposed to happen there.

One more week and we at least get a new tidbit (preview for episode 5). I really feel like a junkie at times, when it comes to this show.

 

And for people saying leaked episodes weren't gonna hurt the show, episode 2 numbers have taken a dive, and I suspect it will go down even worse with the new one, and the next one, since the more time passes, the more people will have caught up with the leak.

  • Like 1

How the hell is it slow? So many things happen, episode 4 for instance is mental. They cut out so much of the fat from books 4 & 5. But as LaP said, I figure most people are still riding the last season finale's high, instead of accepting the pacing restart which happens each and every freaking year.

One more week and we at least get a new tidbit (preview for episode 5). I really feel like a junkie at times, when it comes to this show.

 

And for people saying leaked episodes weren't gonna hurt the show, episode 2 numbers have taken a dive, and I suspect it will go down even worse with the new one, and the next one, since the more time passes, the more people will have caught up with the leak.

Well that or a lot of people were dissapointed by the first episode no?

Well that or a lot of people were dissapointed by the first episode no?

 

Nah, I'd say it has more to do with downloads. But it's one of those things, where the leak will also hurt the show, where there's no scientific way of knowing why the numbers are lower, so you could argue that people like Nexus18 are right, even though, if yougo back through the years, most people complained it's slow when the new seasons start, ever since season 2.

Nah, I'd say it has more to do with downloads. But it's one of those things, where the leak will also hurt the show, where there's no scientific way of knowing why the numbers are lower, so you could argue that people like Nexus18 are right, even though, if yougo back through the years, most people complained it's slow when the new seasons start, ever since season 2.

Well, every show i've seen, always has good ratings at the first episode them plummet for the second.

 

True detective, on HBO.

 

S01EP01 2.33million viewers

SO2EP02  1.67

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_True_Detective_episodes

 

 

On BBC, just so you have different ideas on diffent networks:

 

Sherlock:

 

S01E01 9.23

S01E02 8.07

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sherlock_episodes#Series_1_.282010.29

 

 

Ok old series... Friends 1995  NBC  When piracy was not even a thing as it is today.

 

S01E1  21.5m

S02E2  20.2

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_(season_1)

 

 

 

Not saying that piracy doesn't have some effect, i'm just pointing out, general trend for shows is always to have lower ratings for second episode.

  • Like 1

True Detective, on HBO.

 

S01EP01 2.33million viewers

SO2EP02  1.67

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_True_Detective_episodes

 

Season 2 hasn't started yet, so I think you meant to write S01E02.

  • Like 1

So far 3 episodes in, and I'm not liking this season, the writing & acting aren't up to par IMHO as they were in the previous 4 seasons.

almost like we are watching the different show. i rewatched ep3 three times already.   the drama is perfect.   perfect.

 

 

maybe we have very diffrent expectations of the show.

Decent episode, probably the best one yet. I wonder if either of them survived.

 

According to this article...grayworm does but barristan doesn't

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/04/game-of-thrones-argued-against-shocking-death_n_7201962.html

 

And

 

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/05/01/ser-barristan-dead-thrones

Haha, this is hilarious. I'm glad I never bothered to watch past the first episode.

The scene with Stannis and Shireen is one of the most emotional on the show yet. I can't stand book Stannis fanboys who always claim the show doesn't do him justice (it's an epic, people, it's supposed to take years to build characters), and I'm not a big fan of the character anyway, but that was beautiful to watch.

 

Less than a week until the new episode :)

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!