Blur multiplayer will allow PS3 and 360 players to compete


Recommended Posts

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/37821/Blur-touts-360PS3-cross-platform-multiplayer

Activision?s upcoming racer Blur will be the first game to allow PS3 and Xbox 360 players to compete against each other AND the first to offer online multiplayer for Silver members of Xbox Live Arcade.

That?s the headline claim being made by Bizarre Creations, though the mechanics of the functionality are a little more complicated.

In truth, integrated Twitter functionality will allow users to challenge one another ? no matter what platform they?re playing on ? over the social network.

In addition, Xbox 360 owners will be able to swap challenges via Xbox Live's message system regardless of their membership level.

?In the single player mode when you finish a race, it records all of your stats and information,? lead designer Gareth Wilson told MTV Multiplayer.

?You can choose what you want to put into your challenge and send it to your buddy. He receives that as an Xbox Dashboard message, so he could be playing another game, he could be watching TV on Netflix.

Awesome (Y)

Dunno how this was pushed through MS (online mp without gold), but I guess it has to be or the ruckus of PS3 owners are doing this for free would kick up.

It doesn't sound like anything any other game can't do. You record your single player race stats and send them to another person as a "challenge". It doesn't sound like you're actually physically racing someone else across systems or membership levels. That's how I'm reading it anyways.

-Spenser

It doesn't sound like anything any other game can't do. You record your single player race stats and send them to another person as a "challenge". It doesn't sound like you're actually physically racing someone else across systems or membership levels. That's how I'm reading it anyways.

-Spenser

Yup, which would explain why Silver members can play "online".

The headline has been taken out of context

It doesn't sound like anything any other game can't do. You record your single player race stats and send them to another person as a "challenge". It doesn't sound like you're actually physically racing someone else across systems or membership levels. That's how I'm reading it anyways.

-Spenser

Yeah, read it the same way. Still, pretty cool and overdue for this.

It doesn't sound like anything any other game can't do. You record your single player race stats and send them to another person as a "challenge". It doesn't sound like you're actually physically racing someone else across systems or membership levels. That's how I'm reading it anyways.

-Spenser

yeah i was thinking the same thing. where does it say silver subscribers can't actually play against gold members... (see what i did there?). PS3 vs Xbox is kinda cool though.

It doesn't sound like anything any other game can't do. You record your single player race stats and send them to another person as a "challenge". It doesn't sound like you're actually physically racing someone else across systems or membership levels. That's how I'm reading it anyways.

-Spenser

The wording isn't clear on it but it seems that is about two Xbox players playing asynchronous and not PS3 vs 360.

Not that I care about racing games or the way theyve opted to implement cross platform play here, but it would be kind of cool to release a cross platform competitive online game where teams were chosen not so much at random but purely based on what platform you were playing from at the time be it PC, PS3 or XBox. Obviously you'd want some level of balancing on top of that but it'd be interesting to see how people would approach such a game given some people can get so passionate about their system of choice. Sure that would lead to some pretty heated cross team banter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!