• 0

Need advice on what Anti-spyware software to use.


Question

I know there are a thousand similar topics to this. But I think I need to explain my specific dilemma.

I've been out of touch for a few years. The last time I trolled here and looked at what was a good and powerful combination of programs to use to protect my PC , I was using AVG Free anti-syware (for Anti-virus), Ad-aware (for anti-spyware), combined with Spy-bot Search and Destroy.

At the time, that was the best thing to do.. to run Ad-aware SE edition with Spybot. The two worked well together, What one missed, the other caught, etc.

I then switched out my anti-virus to Nod32, and added a 3rd anti-spyware to the mix (Windows Defender).

So this is pretty much what I had been using.

Now, I'm still using:

-Nod32 (for Anti-Virus)

-Spybot Search and Destroy (as one of my Anti-spyware).

-Windows Defender (Build in to windows - I'm still on Windows Xp).

But for the longest now my Ad-aware SE has stopped updating (too old). And I've been trying to decide what to replace it with.

It has got me re-evaluating thing, such as if I even need to still be using some of the application in my list above.

I've heard good things (from this site), for Windows Security Essentials. But as I use Nod32. I am not sure if I should have both on at the same time.

But if I keep Nod32.. what should I do for Anti-spyware? I don't think Spybot Search and destroy on it's own, is enough. At least it wasn't so in the past.

And if I do need to add something, what should I now be using?

I'd appreciate any help you guys can provide.

Thanks,

Zanatar.

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I just use Symantec Endpoint Protection. Picks up just about everything from malware to trojans and updates regularly. Not very heavy on system resources (although if you are SHUTTING down, not hibernating, your comp, it's like having to kickstart a dead elephant when you start up) and is fairly small. Symantec seems to have really pulled up their socks with this.

I am however not using anything else. I have't really trustem Microsofts antivirus products because until they can come up with a system with less holes than a sponge (I'm still using XP and don't plan to use 7), 3rd party is the way to go. NOD32 works great too, so if it has worked for you so far, take some risks with some new AV's and see if they get along nicely like a good group of buddies. :rofl: :no: :cool:

  • 0

...

I have a question that I've always been meaning to ask and just never have.. When any Anti virus program quarantines a file due to an infection, it is still on your PC right? It is neither cleaned nor deleted. So what exactly does quarantining it do?

Do I need to remove those 3 quarantined files after? Or is it safe to just leave it as is now that they are quarantined. I've never known what to do with a quarantined file in the past.

...

To actually answer, instead of just bashing each other, files are quarantined in case the file is something you need - an important word document for instance that has been infected, it can cause no further damage. Some files can be repaired, or opened in a safe environment (i.e. a sandbox/vm) later on to recover the data. Unless you recognise and need any of the quarantined files it is perfectly safe to just delete them all.

  • 0

Quarantining is also useful when for you decide to use the most dusty and least used button labelled "Send Virus to Labs for Inspection So We can Better Protect You in Our Next Update"

Doesn't happen very often but quarantining does have it's uses

  • 0

It let a virus through about 5 hours ago on my machine, so I say it blows.

How did you acquire the viruse? Usually a virus doesn't install automatically unless you have an exploit of some kind they got through.

Yes MSE missed "This one" but MSE might also catch one that another AV might miss.

Just by saying "It let" a virus though, means you are relying WAY to much on the AV. Might want to try CS 2.0

  • 0

One thing i would say which i don`t think anyone has mentioned yet is whatever you choose Do Not have it set to automatically Remove a suspected Malware, you need to have some user intervention so if the detection is a false positive and a critical system file, it doesn`t get deleted and bork your system. This has happened many times in the past and will in the future, at least if you have the option you can investigate further...

  • 0

Umm, one more thing, there is a stickied thread up the top of this forum page (Definitive Best Anti-Virus Software) which kinda encompasses 90% of this matter. I'm sure that the thread would also say what programs play nice with others and which ones don't and I would be VERY surprised and dissapointed if it didn't.

Not to say I have any choice in the matter, but if thats ok with you OP, might I reccomend an auto-distruct on this thread set to maybe 5 days? All in the interests of keeping the place tidy, and not to say that everyone's efforts were in vain, but I get the feeling this matter is wrapped up tighter than a taco.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!