Recommended Posts

I'm in the process of testing antivirus software for my office. I'm deciding between two different applications, and I'd like to have some side-by-side comparisons of how well they work. I'm not interested in charts or anything like that that has already been done. I want to see for myself, a live test, of how effective each AV product is.

My users are fairly good at contracting viruses ( :p ), but I can't seem to find any! I'm using IE8 and surfing the internet without any AV software. I'm going to tons of warez & crackz sites, clicking on all the links I can find. My biggest problem is staying away from the porn, since anyone that walks around the corner will see that on my screen. I disabled images for IE to avoid this, but that probably also hindered my ability to get infected.

I already tried the Eicar test virus, but this is not a substantial test as far as I'm concerned. I want to get (a lot) of real viruses. Does anyone know of a sample I can get? If you have a known bad link, post it up!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/883170-where-can-i-download-a-virus/
Share on other sites

Personally I would use data found by other trusted sources. Just because an anti virus can pick up something in one of your tests doesn't mean it will pick up something else in the future.

What I meant by my OP was that I've already looked at all of the data collected by the "professionals" and am interested in a live demo as well. Of course I've taken into account the standardized benchmarks.

http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm

That is the only test file that I know of offhand-

I would in the past say do a search for bonzi buddy-- not really a virus but a difficult spyware to get rid of- I would also say do a search for spyware sherrif -- not really the removal but maybe one of those links could get you infected.

http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm

That is the only test file that I know of offhand-

I would in the past say do a search for bonzi buddy-- not really a virus but a difficult spyware to get rid of- I would also say do a search for spyware sherrif -- not really the removal but maybe one of those links could get you infected.

LOL Bonzi Buddy... I remember that gay little purple ape from the late 90s. As mentioned in my OP, I don't want Eicar. Already tried it, and it's not really a sufficient AV test. It will let you know if your AV engine is working, but can't demonstrate effectiveness at removing a true infection.

I'm in the process of testing antivirus software for my office. I'm deciding between two different applications, and I'd like to have some side-by-side comparisons of how well they work. I'm not interested in charts or anything like that that has already been done. I want to see for myself, a live test, of how effective each AV product is.

My users are fairly good at contracting viruses ( :p ), but I can't seem to find any! I'm using IE8 and surfing the internet without any AV software. I'm going to tons of warez & crackz sites, clicking on all the links I can find. My biggest problem is staying away from the porn, since anyone that walks around the corner will see that on my screen. I disabled images for IE to avoid this, but that probably also hindered my ability to get infected.

I already tried the Eicar test virus, but this is not a substantial test as far as I'm concerned. I want to get (a lot) of real viruses. Does anyone know of a sample I can get? If you have a known bad link, post it up!

The most virus alerts I've ever gotten were torrent finds looking for "NERO" burning software...practically EVERY SINGLE ONE! I finally bought one, since no one could post a good/working copy.

No insult to you, but I simply cannot fathom how on earth you feel a live demonstration would somehow sway your choice in picking an AV. So the AV detects it? So what, that's like 1 out of a billion viruses. Perhaps you should leave the AV testing to those that actually know what they're doing (presumably they don't need to go around on tech sites asking for viruses to compile their tests...) and perhaps you might try a nicer attitude also.

Unless of course, this is all a ruse and you actually just want a virus so you can infect somebody that's ****ed you off (wouldn't be the first time it's happened)

No insult to you, but I simply cannot fathom how on earth you feel a live demonstration would somehow sway your choice in picking an AV. So the AV detects it? So what, that's like 1 out of a billion viruses. Perhaps you should leave the AV testing to those that actually know what they're doing (presumably they don't need to go around on tech sites asking for viruses to compile their tests...) and perhaps you might try a nicer attitude also.

Unless of course, this is all a ruse and you actually just want a virus so you can infect somebody that's ****ed you off (wouldn't be the first time it's happened)

I don't appreciate the accusation. I tend to have a short attitude with those that post dumbass responses without reading posts (not referring to you, but see above). I choose to test this way because that's what I want. If you don't want to help, then fine. And when you say "leave the testing to those that know what they're doing", I know what I'm doing. I know that I clean viruses off of machines (far) too often, and I know an effective removal when I see it (Malwarebytes, for example, in many cases). I'd like to see this for myself with one of the AV apps I'm testing. Is that OK with you?

I don't appreciate the accusation. I tend to have a short attitude with those that post dumbass responses without reading posts (not referring to you, but see above). I choose to test this way because that's what I want. If you don't want to help, then fine. And when you say "leave the testing to those that know what they're doing", I know what I'm doing. I know that I clean viruses off of machines (far) too often, and I know an effective removal when I see it (Malwarebytes, for example, in many cases). I'd like to see this for myself with one of the AV apps I'm testing. Is that OK with you?

By "know what I'm doing" I assume you mean when the box comes up that asks whether you want to delete the virus or not you know to press "yes"? Seriously, in comparison to the companies out there that dedicate their entire business model to the study of real viruses, their patterns, and anti-virus software heuristics, I'd say your own 'test' is pretty fruitless - if you're serious about protecting your corporate environment, you'll forget endangering it more by downloading viruses on it, and instead do some in-depth study of existing published material on which corporate anti virus solutions work the best.

here is what I would do, start going to torrent sites and clicking on ads. there are plenty of viruses there. you want more go to off the wall porn sites, if they don't have anything on their websites click on the ads. finally go to warez sites and password crack sites and click on the ads there. it is almost ridiculous how easy this stuff is to get on your computer when you try to get stuff for free/work around licensing.

you can also try downloading torrents, I would say about 50-70% are loaded with viruses/malware.

By "know what I'm doing" I assume you mean when the box comes up that asks whether you want to delete the virus or not you know to press "yes"? Seriously, in comparison to the companies out there that dedicate their entire business model to the study of real viruses, their patterns, and anti-virus software heuristics, I'd say your own 'test' is pretty fruitless - if you're serious about protecting your corporate environment, you'll forget endangering it more by downloading viruses on it, and instead do some in-depth study of existing published material on which corporate anti virus solutions work the best.

While I agree somewhat, reading can only go so far. I don't know any IT admin who has purchased the licenses for a domain/workgroup/massive networrk to an av product without actually trying it first. There is nothing wrong with throwing a couple viruses/malware at them in a sandbox and seeing how they react and behave. If you even take it from an end user perspective, seeing how they react to these programs and viruses could be valuable information. I'd almost call someone an incompetent/lazy admin if they didn't do this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!