Recommended Posts

MikaelKalms

DICE

Join Date: Jan 2010

Posts: 134

The Vietnam maps are not repurposed BC2 maps.

The directory names for the Vietnam maps are mp_001_nam, mp_002_nam, etc.

We have run dev servers against the public backend on occasion. www.bfbcs.com has noticed those map directories being run on our dev servers; then the creators of www.bfbcs.com have incorrectly assumed that mp_001_nam is a Vietnam version of Panama Canal, etc.

And then some people get a bit excited.

So, to reiterate: the info on www.bfbcs.com is incorrect. Chill.

http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-bad-company-2-ng/1300169-vietnams-4-maps-same-maps-4.html#post17673477

Just thought I'd post this. If anyone here is using GTX 480, SLI 480, Tri-SLI 480 or Quad-SLI 480's on this game and you are having a stutter issue (framerate stays constant but every 10 seconds or so its like the game skips a frame) then once the game is open go to Task Manager and right click on the Bf2.exe process and select 'Set Affinity' and uncheck all but 3 of your processor threads. If you have a Core i7 you should have 8 threads listed, uncheck 5 of them. This will make the game run smooth again until NVIDIA and EA sort the issue out. Not everyone with the above setup is affected but some are.

ATi cards, GTX 200, 9xxx 8xxx and below series are unaffected.

it's 2 threads on an i7 so on any given quad core should be 3 cores being used, and it only works for single gpu set ups. sli needs to be fed by all the cores to keep up.

i've seen reports it also does work on ati cards with this issue. although they seem to be less vocal about it.

at least this is what i've read on the subject in a thread at evga 400 series forums, but there was two guys arguing about how fast c2 quad cores were vs bottle neck on 480 sli so yeah. but the quote in the OP from yet another forum said to just disable 2 threads on i7s this way to fix the issue.

kirbygtr: "@demize99 Just saying I can understand 1 button for actions on consoles but not on the PC. It makes disarming difficult and it not like-"

Source: Twitter / Kirby: @demize99 Just saying I ca ...

Demize99: "@kirbygtr Interact and pick up kit have been the same button on all BF games ever. You need to try harder, though I admit mcoms show a flaw."

Source: Twitter / Alan Kertz: @kirbygtr Interact and pic ...

Demize's response on why the 'E' key is combined with pick up kits and arm/disarm mcoms..

That guy is such a class act. No Demize, you need to try harder. And he's wrong, too. The sad part is BC2 is not the first game he's worked on so he should know.. :wacko:

Would be nice to have a different button for arming/disarming the mcom on the PC. Can't even count how many times I came to disarm/arm the mcom, and then grabbed the kit of the fallen guy that was attacking/protecting it before me instead.

Sometimes it's really annoying, especially on the last seconds when the mcom is armed and your job is to disarm it.

I haven't played in months, but I'm really looking forward to getting back into it once my new videocard comes in the mail. It's beefier than my old one so I'll be able to play the game with higher settings. I can't wait!

How do you manage to get good accuracy with auto shotguns? Mine are always pretty bad. Maybe I just suck idk :(

Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes. ;)

How do you manage to get good accuracy with auto shotguns? Mine are always pretty bad. Maybe I just suck idk :(
I dunno, I guess because I came from playing ET:QW some of the skills I learnt there must have transferred over. Even though game play mechanics are completely different.
Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes. ;)
Hey! I do plenty of long rang shots with my SAIGA/USAS (Y) What GFX card you getting?

I dunno, I guess because I came from playing ET:QW some of the skills I learnt there must have transferred over. Even though game play mechanics are completely different.

At least then I've got a good enough excuse because BC2 is my first online shooter. :D

Yeah, and I remember you going on some big knife killing sprees too. Though that's a totally different subject. :laugh:

Ha ha, this comment and the amount I've lost at SC2 makes me want to come back into the game.whistle.gif

No one defends mcoms because it's pointless to do so. You can load a blackhawk, quad bike, or hummer up with c4 and drive it into an mcom station and destroy it instantly. I wouldn't mind the c4 if people actually ran up to the mcom and put it on there, but they don't. DICE needs to make it so c4 can't be put on vehicles.

Thanks to the brilliant minds at DICE. Lets put all the objectives either out in the open or in buildings that get destroyed if you do more than breath on them. Brilliant.

Between the tiny choke points on just about every map and people c4ing objectives it's really starting to get old. You can accurately predict that in any given game on any give map where the game will end. On Arica Harbor it will most likely end at the second set of mcoms with the A mcom probably not even being touched. In Port Valdez it will most likely end after the second set of mcoms with neither going down, that is if you make it past the second ones. Blah blah blah blah.

Yeah, I just got out of a game where the other team didn't even bother trying to arm the mcoms, they just c4'd them. Irritating... rage quitting is becoming more and more common for me these days. :angry:

No one defends mcoms because it's pointless to do so. You can load a blackhawk, quad bike, or hummer up with c4 and drive it into an mcom station and destroy it instantly. I wouldn't mind the c4 if people actually ran up to the mcom and put it on there, but they don't. DICE needs to make it so c4 can't be put on vehicles.

Thanks to the brilliant minds at DICE. Lets put all the objectives either out in the open or in buildings that get destroyed if you do more than breath on them. Brilliant.

Between the tiny choke points on just about every map and people c4ing objectives it's really starting to get old. You can accurately predict that in any given game on any give map where the game will end. On Arica Harbor it will most likely end at the second set of mcoms with the A mcom probably not even being touched. In Port Valdez it will most likely end after the second set of mcoms with neither going down, that is if you make it past the second ones. Blah blah blah blah.

Yeah, I just got out of a game where the other team didn't even bother trying to arm the mcoms, they just c4'd them. Irritating... rage quitting is becoming more and more common for me these days. :angry:

Exactly. This happened to me a couple of times today, I wanted to quit but didn't want to lose the good k/d ratio I had. I don't think I am going to play Rush a lot now.

No one defends mcoms because it's pointless to do so. You can load a blackhawk, quad bike, or hummer up with c4 and drive it into an mcom station and destroy it instantly. I wouldn't mind the c4 if people actually ran up to the mcom and put it on there, but they don't. DICE needs to make it so c4 can't be put on vehicles.

Thanks to the brilliant minds at DICE. Lets put all the objectives either out in the open or in buildings that get destroyed if you do more than breath on them. Brilliant.

Between the tiny choke points on just about every map and people c4ing objectives it's really starting to get old. You can accurately predict that in any given game on any give map where the game will end. On Arica Harbor it will most likely end at the second set of mcoms with the A mcom probably not even being touched. In Port Valdez it will most likely end after the second set of mcoms with neither going down, that is if you make it past the second ones. Blah blah blah blah.

Yeah, I just got out of a game where the other team didn't even bother trying to arm the mcoms, they just c4'd them. Irritating... rage quitting is becoming more and more common for me these days. :angry:

Personally I've seen attackers using c4ed vehicles quite rarely. And regular c4ing is fine; if defenders let attackers in, it's their own fault. Imo the stupid amount of chokepoints is a more important problem.

I recently played Conquest mode on Nelson Bay after a long break from the game (all thanks to StarCraft 2 and Modern Warfare 2). Honestly, it feels like my performance isn't as good as it used to be. The map pack update was server-side right? It could be a problem on my end but I don't know what it is. Nothing has changed on my end: driver version is still the same, CPU clock speed is the same, etc. And no, there isn't any dust in my case. It could just be the daytime lighting on the map as I always felt that Nelson Bay (Rush) offered better performance because of the lack of lighting.

No one defends mcoms because it's pointless to do so. You can load a blackhawk, quad bike, or hummer up with c4 and drive it into an mcom station and destroy it instantly. I wouldn't mind the c4 if people actually ran up to the mcom and put it on there, but they don't. DICE needs to make it so c4 can't be put on vehicles.

Thanks to the brilliant minds at DICE. Lets put all the objectives either out in the open or in buildings that get destroyed if you do more than breath on them. Brilliant.

Between the tiny choke points on just about every map and people c4ing objectives it's really starting to get old. You can accurately predict that in any given game on any give map where the game will end. On Arica Harbor it will most likely end at the second set of mcoms with the A mcom probably not even being touched. In Port Valdez it will most likely end after the second set of mcoms with neither going down, that is if you make it past the second ones. Blah blah blah blah.

Yeah, I just got out of a game where the other team didn't even bother trying to arm the mcoms, they just c4'd them. Irritating... rage quitting is becoming more and more common for me these days. :angry:

This is exactly why I refuse to play Rush. The majority of the time they just go off due to the building they're in being destroyed.

The gol is awesome. My favorite rifle in the game.

Edit: Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd I finally platinum stared my AEK-971. Wow that gun is horrible compared the M4.

AEK is awful, god knows how you managed to platinum it. I could hardly kill enough people with it to unlock the second assault gun!

If the AEK is awful then I wonder what that makes the F2000. There isn't a word to describe how bad that gun is. If you get in a close range fire fight with some one when using the f2000...well I've see the respawn screen a lot when using that gun.

Anyways, maybe I'll try playing conquest more.. I always hated conquest though.

If the AEK is awful then I wonder what that makes the F2000. There isn't a word to describe how bad that gun is. If you get in a close range fire fight with some one when using the f2000...well I've see the respawn screen a lot when using that gun.

Haha, I always got killed with it when I was using the M60!
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!