Recommended Posts

Play Hardcode mode then, i got annoyed that you have to use up a full clip into someone, with HC mode its brilliant i only play HC now.

It's not that it takes a full clip to kill some one it's that my shots aren't even being detected by the server. On my end it's showing me that I got hits on the person but the server doesn't see it that way so I don't know that HC would solve that issue.

Big fat sigh. The M16 is the worst gun in the game now. I think the F2000 kills more quickly at any rage than the M16, that's how bad it is. With the horrendous hit registration I think I'm lucky if 1 bullet out of the 3 round burst even hits, and that's at close to medium range. :wacko:

I got a great deal ($25) on the ultimate edition for the 360. Even though I already had the original on the ps3, I couldn't resist.

The onslaught and 1943 made it an easy enough sale.

Lookin' forward to playing through the ranks again.

That Vietnam gameplay video looks nice indeed. Looks like the flamethrower changes the game dynamic quite a bit, especially with the flame tanks. Here's hoping that it just doesn't get annoying with every second player on a server packing the flamethrower.

It amazes me that people still insist on trying to snipe from spawn. I don't know why I still play this game. The amount of idiots in this game far outweigh the people who actually have some idea on how to play. :angry: :angry: :angry:

It's because everyone thinks it's the same as COD, run around and get the best K/D.

I've witnessed people who spend the entire game sniping from their spawn on Conquest without attempting on taking a flag, or people who hang around flags and don't even attempt to take it. The game mode isn't called Team Deathmatch, is it?

You think you've got it bad, it's even worse on the 360. Atleast people on the PC know how to play Conquest from BF2.

Here's a decent multiplayer video, you can hear the music in the choppers towards the end...

To be fair to these 'lame' players, and speaking from very recent experience, you can't expect new players to pick up the game immediately.

It's a big scary battlefield to be thrown into, and the first few times I joined a server I was killed so many times before I'd seen an enemy at all. So instead of bitching at snipers who camp at their spawn help them out. Ingame chat, hey if you moved to xxx it would help both your sniping and our team, blablabla.

Long story short, I didn't know what the **** I was doing. So just because you do and are amazing with all of your advanced weapons and upgrades shut up bitching.

People aren't vetted before they can play. Join a league if you want badasses only.

/rant.

Amazing game. I'm only really getting great results with the medic so far. Recons fun but I can't resist running into the trouble. Assault weapons seem weak (only unlocked the first two so far) and mags are too small when you're used to 200 rounds. :p

Amazing game. I'm only really getting great results with the medic so far. Recons fun but I can't resist running into the trouble. Assault weapons seem weak (only unlocked the first two so far) and mags are too small when you're used to 200 rounds. :p

Stick with Medic to rank fast.

It's because everyone thinks it's the same as COD, run around and get the best K/D.

I've witnessed people who spend the entire game sniping from their spawn on Conquest without attempting on taking a flag, or people who hang around flags and don't even attempt to take it. The game mode isn't called Team Deathmatch, is it?

You think you've got it bad, it's even worse on the 360. Atleast people on the PC know how to play Conquest from BF2.

You can't really expect a fully functional team on a random server, though it's not nearly as bad as you make out. I am often surprised at how much team work I get when playing with random folk.

To be fair to these 'lame' players, and speaking from very recent experience, you can't expect new players to pick up the game immediately.

It's a big scary battlefield to be thrown into, and the first few times I joined a server I was killed so many times before I'd seen an enemy at all. So instead of bitching at snipers who camp at their spawn help them out. Ingame chat, hey if you moved to xxx it would help both your sniping and our team, blablabla.

Long story short, I didn't know what the **** I was doing. So just because you do and are amazing with all of your advanced weapons and upgrades shut up bitching.

People aren't vetted before they can play. Join a league if you want badasses only.

I totally understand what you're saying. I've taking it into consideration, I'm wrong and wish to retract my statement. I'll let that rank 50 sit and snipe from the tree line outside his base the intire game of Conquest, on Panama Canal.

Well, here's the situation that set me off. It was on Isla Inocentes. We started off pretty good with team work and took out one of the mcoms pretty fast. But after that, I'm not exaggerating here the entire team decided it wanted to camp on the hill or snipe from the trees to the left of the spawn area. I was the only one rushing the mcom and dieing for it, meaning I didn't get any kills. At the end of the round I was dead last in score because of this fact and it ****ed me off because they're like "lolzers you're dead last in score what do you know stfu up noob". And not all of these people were new to the game, as well. Rage quit commenced..

I don't deny people their own playing styles, but I mean really??? They play to lose? What is the point in even playing if you're not gonna try to win. I wish the scoreboard showed your overall score per minute and not K/D. I may not have the best KDR but not very many people have a higher spm. :angry:

Well, here's the situation that set me off. It was on Isla Inocentes. We started off pretty good with team work and took out one of the mcoms pretty fast. But after that, I'm not exaggerating here the entire team decided it wanted to camp on the hill or snipe from the trees to the left of the spawn area. I was the only one rushing the mcom and dieing for it, meaning I didn't get any kills. At the end of the round I was dead last in score because of this fact and it ****ed me off because they're like "lolzers you're dead last in score what do you know stfu up noob". And not all of these people were new to the game, as well. Rage quit commenced..

I don't deny people their own playing styles, but I mean really??? They play to lose? What is the point in even playing if you're not gonna try to win. I wish the scoreboard showed your overall score per minute and not K/D. I may not have the best KDR but not very many people have a higher spm. :angry:

That's the main reason I stopped playing Rush all together.

Got sick of being the only one, going right after the MCOMs, just to have an entire team waiting for me.

And defending is just as sucky IMO, everyone goes their way, leaving MCOMs alone.

I totally understand what you're saying. I've taking it into consideration, I'm wrong and wish to retract my statement. I'll let that rank 50 sit and snipe from the tree line outside his base the intire game of Conquest, on Panama Canal.

Cool, glad I could help...tongue.gif

To be fair to these 'lame' players, and speaking from very recent experience, you can't expect new players to pick up the game immediately.

It's a big scary battlefield to be thrown into, and the first few times I joined a server I was killed so many times before I'd seen an enemy at all. So instead of bitching at snipers who camp at their spawn help them out. Ingame chat, hey if you moved to xxx it would help both your sniping and our team, blablabla.

Long story short, I didn't know what the **** I was doing. So just because you do and are amazing with all of your advanced weapons and upgrades shut up bitching.

People aren't vetted before they can play. Join a league if you want badasses only.

/rant.

Amazing game. I'm only really getting great results with the medic so far. Recons fun but I can't resist running into the trouble. Assault weapons seem weak (only unlocked the first two so far) and mags are too small when you're used to 200 rounds. :p

You're assuming the people I was playing with were all new to the game. They weren't. Most of them were above rank 35.

Like I said, I don't begrudge people their own playing styles, if you want to spam the CG or snipe from spawn be my guest. I might not like it but there are a lot of things people do that I don't like. But when an entire team decides they'd rather sit on a hill side and admire the scenery and then tell me I'm the worst player on the team because I'm actually trying to go after then objectives.. well, we'll have issues then.

So please don't assume I'm "bitching" without cause. I do say "hey guys, move up, use smoke to cover yourselves" and things like that, but yeah.. you can lead a horse to water..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!