Got a PS3. Now just have a few questions!


Recommended Posts

Got me a PS3 on Saturday. I've owned 2 xboxes in my time but never made the Sony leap.

I just have a few questions about my new console.

I got it with Littlebigplanet, Assassins Creed 2, Ghostbusters and Bioshock 2.

My first reaction when trying to play them, after coming from an xbox, was just how long it took before I could play them. They have to install, there is no optional install it seems to be mandatory on some games so that's a 10 minute wait before I can even start up. Not a big problem I guess, but I plan on renting my games and my poor 40gb HD is going to take a beating.

But perhaps my most important issue is framerate. Unless my Ps3 is faulty but I seem to be getting lots of framerate issues. In bioshock 2, I feel like the PS3 is just struggling to run it. Ghostbusters is where I really notice it though. It just seems to be straining most of the time and its noticeable. In fact my PC runs both those games alot faster.

Assassins Creed 2 is better, but when I bring up the map there is a noticeable lag.

I guess what I'm asking is, is this performance normal? Or have I got a defective unit?

I think to be blunt, the PS3 is too complex for most developers so they focus their attention on the Xbox 360 (and PC) versions.

So try going for exclusive or first-party titles, otherwise you will see some jerky frame rates and stuff.

Ghostbusters was certainly one of the sloppy ports that hit the PS3 lower resolution etc etc got a total slating. Not heard anything about Bioshock 2 though so that surprises me.

As mentioned try picking up some exclusives if you really want to see what the machine can do. Although there really is little reason for sloppy ports anyways.

A lot of cross platform titles have an install on the hard disk for the PS3.

Its fairly rare for First party titles to have an install, those that do have a small install footprint. Final Fantasy 13 is another good example of game that does not install, but has quick load times.

I guess it all comes down to the developer.

Basically it comes down to what others have said so far, poorly optimized ports.

Uncharted 2 for example, which is a PS3 exclusive, runs beautifully for me all of the time and is a very enjoyable game.

Assassins Creed 2 runs exactly the same on the PS3 as it does on the 360 - the map 'lags' in both.

Bioshock 2 runs perfectly fine on my PS3, same as on the 360.

This was my understanding as well, that both of these games ran fine.

Honestly I have not really heard about frame rate being a widespread issue on PS3 games in a good 6 months.

Also to the OP, check in Bioshock 2 menu settings, there is something about locking the frame rate in and not locking it in, and see if that helps performance with it at all.

Ghostbusters now that is another story, that is a well publicized travesty on the PS3.

They need to install because Blu-Ray is slow read compared to DVD.

It's not hideously slow. At 2x speed (the PS3) Blu-ray is read constantly at 9MBps. At 12x speed (the 360) DVD averages 11MBps with a single layer and 8MBps with a dual layer.

It's not hideously slow. At 2x speed (the PS3) Blu-ray is read constantly at 9MBps. At 12x speed (the 360) DVD averages 11MBps with a single layer and 8MBps with a dual layer.

Good of you to point that out. Most people just see the #x and assume that number alone tells the whole story.

Thanks for the info. I thought I was going mad. I guess ill try to swap in Ghostbusters for another title. Even if the framerate issue wasn't there, I find the game too boring to be honest.

Apart from Uncharted 2, can anyone recommend any other really good titles exclusive to PS3?

PS3 has many excellent exclusives, there's more to it than just Uncharted or MGS4 (which 9 out of 10 people you ask here will answer with :p). "Really good" is subjective so yea...

Valkyria Chronicles

MLB 10

Disgaea 3

Demon's Souls

God of War Collection/3

Heavy Rain

Killzone 2

Ninja Gaiden 2

InFamous

Rachet and Clank

White Knight Chronicles

LBP

Yakuza 3

MAG

These are just off the top of my head, there are plenty more I'm sure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!