Command & Conquer Copies Ubisoft's Awful DRM


Recommended Posts

Well I'm striking C&C4 off my list, I don't see the point of renting a game at full retain price (as this is essentially what this is). I'm actually not so much bothered it requires an active internet connection but more what is gonna happen when EA shuts down the servers? they can't run them forever obviously, so the real question is how long after release before the game disc becomes a coaster?

Well, a lot of these companies tends to release a patch that removes most of the restrictive DRM features later on in the game's lifecycle. I think EA did that for Sims 3. I do agree with you and I'm not going to buy this game. I don't understand why I have to deal with this BS if I'm going to pay with my hard earned money. It's ridiculous how pirates can have things so easy while paying customers get the shaft.

This game is a piece of s**t. I'm a long time c&c player / fan but this thing is nothing. The missions are easy and annoying, the units are too cartoonish and the artists are painful to watch ( I could kill the "wife" ).

Well, a lot of these companies tends to release a patch that removes most of the restrictive DRM features later on in the game's lifecycle. I think EA did that for Sims 3. I do agree with you and I'm not going to buy this game. I don't understand why I have to deal with this BS if I'm going to pay with my hard earned money. It's ridiculous how pirates can have things so easy while paying customers get the shaft.

No. They never had any on Sims 3, except for digital copies. It requires the DVD in the drive, but thats pretty much it.

Well, a lot of these companies tends to release a patch that removes most of the restrictive DRM features later on in the game's lifecycle.

What I find odd actually is EA seems to have no real generic stance on the issue. They seem to release some titles with restrictive DRM, some pretty much completely free and some with it which they then remove.

Maybe it's just me but it seems to be the sort of thing where I'd just have a company wide policy and stick to that. Perhaps they are just experimenting to see whats popular and they'll unify the entire process down the line.

To be the devil's advocate here: When is your PC not connected to the internet? Apart from outages on the ISP's end my computer is always online.

I have a laptop that could handle this game quite nicely, but I'm not always in a location to get net access with it either. What about people that have a PC/laptop and don't have internet? Some just want to play the game and couldn't care less about multi player.

Are EA so confident that there is there absolutely no workaround for this DRM? Somehow modifying the game so it doesn't need to connect to the net perhaps? Reason I ask is that as soon as someone pulls it off - all EA are doing is punishing loyal customers again!

Offline mode for this game is already done.

However, the requirement was not hidden. And folks are buying the game anyway (even before the offline server workaround was pushed out the door).

If any person that bought the game had been having Internet connection issues, than *any* game that requires a persistent connection (including MMOs) would be a bad bet.

It would be one thing if they weren't aware of either their Internet connection issues, or the game's requirements in that regard. However, where one or both are known well ahead of purchase time, and the game gets bought anyway, I don't blame the developer, or the publisher. I blame the *purchaser* for insufficient due-dilligence.

Whoa - not caught this thread in a few days. Anyway, Ironman was just pointing out that I was stating that my internet connection was perfectly fine and that it appeared to be EA's side of things. I gave it a few days to calm down and just watched the official forums to see when people were able to play again then tried it on Sunday afternoon.

It didn't even go smoothly then because it kept crashing out when trying to load the main menu - a new issue that I'd seen people complaining about on the official forum but I refused to be beaten... After having it happen around 5 times in a row I noticed that each time it crashed out, it loaded the menu buttons but not the chat room (everyone was speculating that it was this causing the errors) so I put my mouse where the campaign/single player button was, loaded the game for a final time and skipped the intro videos whilst nailing the left mouse button as fast as I could. Surely enough I was thrown straight into the single player menu without it crashing out...

I managed to get around 5-6 hours of gameplay in and I'd just saved before I got the random disconnect message again. It seems there are quite a few kinks that they really need to iron out.

As for the other issues you guys have been discussing, I too have a laptop that I game on when I'm out and about so I'm not always guaranteed a web connection which is why I was gutted when I'd heard all those months back that this would require a permanent connection. The suggestion someone made of allowing for an offline skirmish/campaign profile would be great but I doubt EA are gonna be doing anything else with this game :(

Well, here you go PGHammer, straight from the horse's mouth:

EA's mouthpiece foiled by Command and Conquer DRM

By Ben Kuchera | Last updated a day ago

When you have to be connected to the Internet at all times to be able to play a single-player game, something has gone terribly wrong with this industry. EA's first-party blogger and outspoken mouthpiece Jeff Green found this out the hard way, and spread the word. "Booted twice?and progress lost?on my single-player C&C4game because my DSL connection blinked. DRM fail. We need new solutions," he posted to Twitter.

He then goes on and says that calling it a single-player game may not be fair. "However, C&C4 experiments w/what a "single-player game" is?given it's constantly uploading progress/stats for unlocks. It's complicated... I think if we think of C&C4 as an 'online-only' game?which it basically is?then maybe we'd adjust our expectations accordingly."

Making single-player games effectively online-only is a bad solution to any problem, especially after we've explored how many people live without reliable Internet connections. You could save the points and progress and upload them when there is a connection, as Green points out, or simply design your games assuming players may not always be where there is Internet.

Green sent a warning to prospective players. "The story is fun, the gameplay is interesting and different at least?but if you suffer from shaky/unreliable DSL?you've been warned."

Source: ArsTechnica

Well, here you go PGHammer, straight from the horse's mouth:

Source: ArsTechnica

[/size][/color][/size][/font][/color]

And his issue was his normally-reliable connection (DSL) fell down. How is C&C 4 respeonsible for that?

Also, he stated *categorically* that he knew about the *persistent Internet connection requirement* when he got the game.

Sounds like nerdrage to me (and like trying to pass the buck).

Also, you can go back to the last point you were credited with and pick up from there (instead of having to go all the way back to the beginning) as the same autosave system that C&C has always had remains in place. (Comes in handy when you have to leave a game in the middle for *other* reasons, like someone else's computer acting up.)

I used that back-to-a-previous-save option to progress in alternating fashion through the GDI and NOD campaigns (I had initially started with the NOD campaign, but then later went back to the branch point and chose GDI).

I therefore *categorically* refuse to take your bait.

No base building = fail.

Edit: This game has been cracked by Reloaded and Skidsrow, so now only paying costumers are suffering.

And why are they suffering?

No base building = fail.

Edit: This game has been cracked by Reloaded and Skidsrow, so now only paying costumers are suffering.

they didnt crack anything. All they did was have you add a line to your hosts file to loopback to you (127.0.0.1).

That method has been used on apps and games for ages.

they didnt crack anything. All they did was have you add a line to your hosts file to loopback to you (127.0.0.1).

That method has been used on apps and games for ages.

Actually, I have a friend who downloaded it. He told me about it while he was downloading it and I told him that it was going to be a pain to install because you needed to edit your hosts file, etc. He installed it and called me over to see it. Apparently he just copied a couple of cracked files over to the install directory and now when he starts the game it bring up a window with 2 buttons. The first button says "Start server" (the other is grayed out at first). Then the server button grays out and the second button: "Start Game" gets enabled. Click on the button and the game starts. He played part of the first mission, so it works that far. It was all very simple and, frankly, pretty professional looking.

Actually, I have a friend who downloaded it. He told me about it while he was downloading it and I told him that it was going to be a pain to install because you needed to edit your hosts file, etc. He installed it and called me over to see it. Apparently he just copied a couple of cracked files over to the install directory and now when he starts the game it bring up a window with 2 buttons. The first button says "Start server" (the other is grayed out at first). Then the server button grays out and the second button: "Start Game" gets enabled. Click on the button and the game starts. He played part of the first mission, so it works that far. It was all very simple and, frankly, pretty professional looking.

AC2 will get that some day. They already have a server emulator and are working on key values that the game sends to Ubisoft, and logging the Ubisoft responses. In short, the AC2 server emulator works for a majority of the game already, from what I have heard there are only a few sidemissions and what not that are not working yet, but all the main storyline missions (or at least most of them) work without issue.

Chances are once it gets working 100%, someone will make a 1-touch "crack" similar to what you mention, where there is a button to start the emulation server, then another to launch the game.

More difficult to do than standard cracks, but now that its done all people need to do is do similar things for other games with the same DRM.....the longest part will be getting all the values so people can play 100% of the game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!