Popular games you just can't get into?


Recommended Posts

Half-Life 2 I'm afraid. Love TF2 and Portal, but Half-life gives me that POV sickness feeling. I've adjusted the video settings and it doesn't happen as often, but I still can't go with more than half an hours play.

Motion sickness?

I honestly do not understand motion sickness at all. I get sick as a dog in airplanes, and quite sick from car rides as well (mostly from stop and go traffic or cars that ride extremely rough), as well as on boats (though, thats sea sickness....slightly different than general motion sickness). But I have NEVER felt motion sickness from playing a video game. I have played nearly every halfway decent PC FPS game that exists, as well as many other types of games and have not once got sick from it, but I get motion sickness from virtually ever other source of rapid movement.

Any game that begins with call of duty, any popular mmo,anything that is over-hyped and is "next gen" :rolleyes: , games like crysis,oblivion. In general games that receive so much praise while in reality they lack any serious depth and good gameplay ;) .

Motion sickness?

I honestly do not understand motion sickness at all. I get sick as a dog in airplanes, and quite sick from car rides as well (mostly from stop and go traffic or cars that ride extremely rough), as well as on boats (though, thats sea sickness....slightly different than general motion sickness). But I have NEVER felt motion sickness from playing a video game. I have played nearly every halfway decent PC FPS game that exists, as well as many other types of games and have not once got sick from it, but I get motion sickness from virtually ever other source of rapid movement.

I remember getting motion sickness with Metroid Prime 3, but that was a mixture of poor graphics (Wii standard in 480i) and a crappy TV so it made it worse. I want it again though now as I have a new telly...

I know a few people that can't play FPSs at all or for a long period of time because they get motion sickness from it. My girlfriend can't even watch me play a fps game for more than five minutes because she starts getting nausiated.

Well.. that's not as much not being able to get into it, as having a lack of time due to playing great games :laugh:

Well, now that's true but I bought it when it came out so like a couple weeks before either of those two games. ;) Plus, I need a new comp to play it on high!

About 2/3 of the popular FPS games (Crysis, CoD, Halo).

Never finished the first Assassin's Creed.

Tried Everquest and Ultima Online, didn't even bother with WoW. It's odd, tho, because I was addicted to old school text MUDs back in the 90's before I got my PS1.

Sim racers (Gran Turismo, etc.).

Halo -- I think only because I grew up as a PC Gamer -- so Halo had absolutely NOTHING to offer me other than a generic story line :yawn:

Bioshock 2 -- The first one I had a lot of fun with...I guess the 2nd felt too...repetitive of the first for me.

Half-Life -- Could never get into it whatsoever, but I was and still am a DoD ###### :p

WoW -- I tried it, really I did lol but it was after a 3 year run with City of Heroes which I was unhealthily addicted to, and WoW just bored me with all the running around, get this get that, etc.

i might get boo'ed for this but here is my list:

Oblivion IV

Gears of War 2

Half life series

apart from these, i never had interest in those sport games like NHL NBA, fifa etc.

Boooo. J/K :D

Halo. I HATE the effing thing.

Gears of War. Just don't get it. Never did.

I never liked sport games either.

Metal Gear Solid - I have the first two in the series and just couldn't think anything but "clunky and cheesy." Sam Fisher FTW.

Halo - have 1 through 3, liked 'em but wouldn't put them in even the top half of FPSs

Modern Warfare - own it, just meh. Of course, I hate online gaming, so there's that.

MMOs - see the part about me hating online gaming. Mostly, I hate people.

Motion sickness?

I honestly do not understand motion sickness at all. I get sick as a dog in airplanes, and quite sick from car rides as well (mostly from stop and go traffic or cars that ride extremely rough), as well as on boats (though, thats sea sickness....slightly different than general motion sickness). But I have NEVER felt motion sickness from playing a video game. I have played nearly every halfway decent PC FPS game that exists, as well as many other types of games and have not once got sick from it, but I get motion sickness from virtually ever other source of rapid movement.

I think it's something like motion sickness, I think it's something to do with the field of view in the game (thanks google). I also felt a bit queezy when I played Timesplitters 2, but apart from those 2 I'm fine with FPS's.

As far anything else, I used to be pretty sick on a aeroplanes, but it's very rare now.

Heavy Rain

Most turn based RPG's (even though I liked FFX)

Starcraft

Diablo

Any MMO that is based on the standard wizards, swordsman, etc formula and that time period.

Dungeon trolling RPG's like Dragon Age, Demon Souls or even Oblivion.

Half Life 2

Little Big Planet

Uncharted series

Ghost Recon anything

Team Fortress

Street Fighter

@HilariousNinja - Clannad FTW!

Modern Warfare 2 is top on my list. I've tried to get into it on many occasions, but I just don't like the multiplayer on it. I liked the singleplayer campaign though; I played through it on Veteran difficulty.

Grand Theft Auto IV is another one. It's just too dull and bland-looking for me. There's also the huge problem of massive framerate drops in intense scenes. Vice City is still my favourite in the series.

The Final Fantasy series is up there as well for me. I played the beta of FFXI, but it just felt like an even more boring version of World of Warcraft. And I have tried to play through FFVII on two occasions, but I'm just not a fan of it. One of the big reasons for me is that the game is stretched out too much. Last time I tried playing through it, I got about three or four hours in and bugger all happened.

WoW and Oblivion are the only games I found in this thread that I agree with.

Hated oblivion but loved fallout 3.

WoW is the most boring game ever, if they created ONE main storyline and a LOT more cut scenes, I would enjoy it... but you can't be good at the game unless you dedicate your life to it, and its the same grinds over and over and over again.

-Bioshock 1 and 2, got halfway through and forgot about it.

-Any Tom Clancy game

-Any game on a console apart from playing FIFA with mates, just hate controllers. (PC ftw)

-Elder Scroll games, combat is horrible imo. That and any other game with similar combat.

-Point and click RPG's; bores me to death.

Probably a lot more other games I can't think off.

Ever since playing the Mass Effect games, I've looked at games differently I have to say. No longer is Jedi Academy or Half Life my benchmark to games on how games incorporate story, gameplay and graphics. Jedi Academy was really just me loving Star Wars and finally being able to play as a Jedi without any crappy point clicking crap. Best Star Wars game in the series, perfect. Half Life was awesome as well, embodying story and gameplay as well as well scripted scenes. Amazing. Mass Effect just topples them with the immersive story and great execution of both gameplay mechanics and graphics. Still not sure which I like better in terms of gameplay, 1 or 2 :s. 1 had a proper inventory and felt more like a RPG than number 2 did but number 2 had better combat among other things, easier to say it was more streamlined.

Whoops, got a little off topic haha

Edit: Fallout 3 :blush: Started out okay I guess but the combat (again) gets way too boring (admittedly, my save game got corrupted otherwise I may have played the game through). I might try it again someday, not sure when though.

I actually completed Bioshock and wasn't overly impressed with it - certainly not enough to be thrilled by the thought of a sequel. All the bugs and glitches didn't help either.

Strategy games - I want to like these but could never get my head around how to keep control of all these units around a battlefield. Small squad games, like Soldiers: Heroes of WWII, I can play but that's because you're keeping all your units more or less on screen so can keep an eye on them.

I actually completed Bioshock and wasn't overly impressed with it - certainly not enough to be thrilled by the thought of a sequel. All the bugs and glitches didn't help either.

Strategy games - I want to like these but could never get my head around how to keep control of all these units around a battlefield. Small squad games, like Soldiers: Heroes of WWII, I can play but that's because you're keeping all your units more or less on screen so can keep an eye on them.

yeah RTS are the hardest games ever. takes some practice. I am sort of good at warhammer 40K cause I used to play it with my brother all night when I was at my dads, though all I did was build a massive force with one of the super unit things, and just sent them in an destroyed anything that moved

WoW - My mate was level 60 or whatever when I joined her server. The goal was I'd level up to a point where I could play with her but after two weeks I was at about lvl 18 and bored of going at it alone and quit.

Forza - Bit dull IMHO. Not much of a racing sim fan so this game didn't interest me. Loved Project Gotham mind you.

MGS4 - Only played an hr or two so I might get back into it. At this early stage it seems a tad dull but. Quirky but dull. One I need to give a better chance probably

GTA IV - Really boring game IMHO. TBH there isn't a sandbox style game that isn't an RPG that I really like. The genre is still in its infancy IMHO and to me feel like where FPS were at when Doom was released compared to what we are getting now. Basically games that are barely touching the surface. Regardless of how expansive these games are I feel the world exists purely to put people and obstacles in front of me and nothing would have any purpose if I ceased to exist. The games are also extremely static. I'll add an exception for AC2 but even that game had a bit of a static world. I thought the missions were fun but.

Anyway to me GTA was a mediocre story (I cared for none of the characters) filled with overly drawn out missions, some of which required too much driving. Give me more in the way of check points and maybe it'll hold my interest better (No, I didnt care for calling down cabs all that much). If anything I prefered Vice City. The smaller world gave it a bit more personality and you got a bit more intimate with the surroundings. Later games have felt too vast and soulless. I liked the vehicles handling better too and the ability to go and purchase properties. Even the soundtrack was fantastic.

I could throw Prototype in there too. A game I loved that got boring rather quick. The reason for putting GTA ahead is that at least Prototype didn't try and be anything else...it didnt try and throw in romancing or a few dull diversions like bowling and the like. GTA 4's attempt to be a bit more realistic hurt it in the end I think.

Assassins Creed: God awful game. The fact the guards were overly suspicious so that anything above a walk would trigger them off alone let this game down. On the other hand AC2 is one of the best games I've played in a long time.

Duke 3D, Farcry 2, Descent and a bunch of older games - A few games here that would make me motion sick within maybe five mins.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!