Worthington predicts five 'Avatar' films

[Hani]

Nice trolling. Just shows how ignorant you are. You clearly don't know who Cameron is. He have pushed movie technology for decades.

You should give some credit to Stan Winston.

Give us a pornographic version of Avatar! I want to see some of that hairy action

:whistle:

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=26754

[x-byte]

You should give some credit to Stan Winston.

Of course. To bad he's not with us anymore.

[thealexweb]

Oh no

[x-byte]

Elaborate. How does me not liking Avatar (or any of Cameron's movies) show that I'm ignorant and unaware of who Cameron is?

Don't you remember your writing.. No story line in Avatar. You are trying too hard.

[brentaal]

Don't you remember your writing.. No story line in Avatar. You are trying too hard.

Try reading between the lines.

[Growled Member]

I wouldn't mind seeing a sequel but prob should stop there, there are way too many movie franchises going into the "Friday the 13th/Nightmare on Elm Street" way of thinking about films...

Some movies make sense to have trilogy's and such because of the continued story but not this one so much... (No I'm not trolling just expressing my Opinion)

I think it has more to do with Hollywood then true film making. There is no reason they couldn't make 10 sequels of great quality. Look at some book series and they have delivered a great quality book throughout the entire series.

[itzwolf]

I love the concept of a series of Avatar films, but I hope it just doesn't turn out to be recycled crap film after film. I'm quite interested to see how they even start the second film, as the first was tied up quite nicely.

+1

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=26754

:blink:

[Valerus]

Sorry this is just asking for this:

hahah this is AWESOME

[Nadja]

Arrrrrrrrrrrgh!!! more blatant display of American bullishness and imperialism coming up as a sub theme.

such a pity because the 3D graphics are awesome :cool:

[iamwhoiam]

Could you please back up your attacks and explain why I'm a troll?

Because your opinion doesn't fit with his opinion, of course.

LOL!

[Fred Derf Veteran]

I consider myself to be a dedicated SciFi fan and I still have zero interest in seeing Avatar. It won't be remembered like Blade Runner, Dark City or Brazil. Heck, even 12 Monkeys will probably age better.

[Rappy Veteran]

I consider myself to be a dedicated SciFi fan and I still have zero interest in seeing Avatar. It won't be remembered like Blade Runner, Dark City or Brazil. Heck, even 12 Monkeys will probably age better.

I am in the same mind dude, I love Sci-Fi always have but like you I don't really see myself sitting down to watch it, from the outset and the concept on the film I was like "meh" and I still am. I will never fault it for its visual attraction but you can see from just pictures it looks amazing but no not for me.

[CrossCheck]

+1

same here i have no interest in seeing a movie that stole its title from a cartoon. i don't know how this film is considered revolutionary or considered a brilliant film when it is 85% CGI. i am so glad cameron lost best director to his ex-wife. Also glad it somewhat got kinda snubbed at the oscars. The Hurt locker is what i call a brilliant movie

[Solid Knight]

same here i have no interest in seeing a movie that stole its title from a cartoon. i don't know how this film is considered revolutionary or considered a brilliant film when it is 85% CGI. i am so glad cameron lost best director to his ex-wife. Also glad it somewhat got kinda snubbed at the oscars. The Hurt locker is what i call a brilliant movie

Eh, I didn't quite see why The Hurt Locker was so great. Although it might be because I was in the military and can't help but call bull**** in some scenes. Of course there were a few scenes that had some problems like the sniper scene (entirely unlikely on its own) where it suddenly transitions from engaging the enemy to the EOD team being dehydrated and weak as if a lot of time had elapsed although there was no indicator of this. It was still overall a good movie but I think it's a tad overrated.

[JonathanVP]

That's great! Avatar overload by 2020!

[Kerm]

I'm just going to go ahead and ask it, what has Cameron revolutionised?

[Growled Member]

I'm just going to go ahead and ask it, what has Cameron revolutionised?

For Avatar he created an entire new camera system. He did the same for shooting underwater for The Abyss. He has also revolutionized sci-fi on the big screen, for better or for worse.

[clotz2000]

<OffTopic> At least we can say it was better than Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus, lol

[Draconian Guppy]

For Avatar he created an entire new camera system. He did the same for shooting underwater for The Abyss. He has also revolutionized sci-fi on the big screen, for better or for worse.

You're going to make me post this again?... Sheesh

I don't see how capturing CGI from multiple angles is "revolutionary" CGI is CGI, PERIOD. With our without motion capture. And I hate to say it to all you avatar fans out there, but visuals AREN'T the only thing that make a great movie... Heck for that matter, lets have james cameron re-do every movie that has had CGI in it and I dare you to spot a difference ;) Though I will give you he came up with some trick for shooting? Big deal, it's not changing the industry as a whole, people take words for granted...

So IMO... Heath ledger revolutionized how villains are to be portrayed.

Lord of the rings revolutionized make up...

Hell even the bullet time in matrix was a lot more "revolutionizing" then avatars CGI...

/revolution

In the end to each their own mate... I consider myself an avid sci-fi fan and count me in on changing channels if it were to show up on HBO/whatever channel you fancy.

[burnsflipper]

please God no, Cameron is the new George Lucas :unsure:

The only good Cameron is my beautiful terminator lady right here :wub:

[max84]

Avatar FTW!!!

[Rappy Veteran]

please God no, Cameron is the new George Lucas :unsure:

The only good Cameron is my beautiful terminator lady right here :wub:

oh yes

[Growled Member]

I don't see how capturing CGI from multiple angles is "revolutionary" CGI is CGI, PERIOD. With our without motion capture.

You are entitled to your opinion, of course.

And I hate to say it to all you avatar fans out there, but visuals AREN'T the only thing that make a great movie...

That's true. The story in Avatar wasn't weak but it wasn't anything new either. Of course, Titantic was the same way. Obviously, Cameron is doing something right for so many people to love his work. It's too bad that some of the really great sci-fi classics haven't reached the big screen. They would make some awesome movies.

In the end to each their own mate... I consider myself an avid sci-fi fan and count me in on changing channels if it were to show up on HBO/whatever channel you fancy.

I am a true blue sci-fi fan and I thought Avatar was great. However, like you said, to each their own.