• 0

[C++] Implement press any key to continue


Question

How to implement press any key to continue?

The following doesn't work, it requires me to press enter.

void pressAnyKeyToContinue()
{
	cin.sync();
	cout << endl << "Press any key to continue..." << endl;
	cin.get();
}

Neither does getchar(); instead on cin.get();

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

What platform are you using?

Without implementing some kind of keyboard hook, I think it's only possible on Windows.:

A) system("pause") - which will make people rant about how "slow" and unreliable it is (but you don't give a **** since you just want to end the program)

B) use the _getch function, which is included in conio.h

  • 0

What platform are you using?

Without implementing some kind of keyboard hook, I think it's only possible on Windows:

A) system("pause") - which will make people rant about how "slow" it is (like you give a **** since you just want to end the program)

B) use the _getch function, which is included in conio.h

Getch(); would work great for you. Though "cin" should already be waiting...but I think your problem is that cin.get(); waits for a specific key (Default Enter)

  • 0

Keep your original code, just change the message to "Press ENTER to continue". Both system("pause") and _getch() are Windows-specific; don't introduce that dependency just for the sake of supporting any key (if you already have that dependency, nevermind). In any case, most users press space or enter when prompted for any key.

  • 0

Keep your original code, just change the message to "Press ENTER to continue". Both system("pause") and _getch() are Windows-specific; don't introduce that dependency just for the sake of supporting any key (if you already have that dependency, nevermind). In any case, most users press space or enter when prompted for any key.

Your argument is made ad infinitum on the web, but it simply doesn't address the OP's question. He wants the user to be able to press any key, not the enter key. And I clearly pointed out that those 2 functions were Windows-specific. But if that's the platform he's developing on, then like you mention, it's perfectly fine. If not, then what he's asking is probably not possible without implementing some low-level key-event hook, but I doubt that would be cross-platform so we'd gain nothing there anyway.
  • 0

It's worth considering both. If it's homework or something, it might be best to simply ask the user to press enter, because this can be done in a cross-platform manner.

If you really want the any key thing and this is for Windows, use boogerjones' option B. There is no good reason to call pause, even if the overhead doesn't really matter. _getch() does the same thing. Remember that you probably want to flush stdin before you call it, otherwise you can end up just reading a character that is already in the buffer instead of prompting for a new one.

If it's for another platform, you would have to find out what the equivalent terminal I/O stuff is there.

  • 0

I see.. Well this then is a pretty difficult problem to overcome. Although ultimately it doesn't really matter much that you have a "press any key to continue" sort of function.

Although.. could he perhaps do something like

int main()
{
char c;
//....code.....
//...more code...
cout << "Press any key to continue.\n";
cin >> c;
//..more code
cout << "I dont know why I have so many pauses here...\n";
cin >> c;
//...etc...
}

Something like this. Just create a character to be used in the "pause" mechanism that comes with getting input.

It's not flawless, but you could just disregard the character otherwise. It only takes up one byte, anyway.

It's still not perfect but hey, do what you can.

  • 0

I think this should work:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <termios.h>

int main()
{
char x = ' ';

printf("Press any key to continue...\n");
x = getch();

printf("The key you entered is: %c \n", x);

return 0;
}

int getch(void)
{
int ch;
struct termios oldt;
struct termios newt;
tcgetattr(STDIN_FILENO, &oldt); /*store old settings */
newt = oldt; /* copy old settings to new settings */
newt.c_lflag &= ~(ICANON | ECHO); /* make one change to old settings in new settings */
tcsetattr(STDIN_FILENO, TCSANOW, &newt); /*apply the new settings immediatly */
ch = getchar(); /* standard getchar call */
tcsetattr(STDIN_FILENO, TCSANOW, &oldt); /*reapply the old settings */
return ch; /*return received char */
}

I found it here: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-225713.html

  • 0

Something like this. Just create a character to be used in the "pause" mechanism that comes with getting input.

It's not flawless, but you could just disregard the character otherwise. It only takes up one byte, anyway.

It's still not perfect but hey, do what you can.

No, it won't work. It will block at the first cin until you hit enter.

Rudy's code probably will work for the specific platform it's designed for (Linux?), as it's basically an implementation of the Windows _getch().

  • 0

No, it won't work. It will block at the first cin until you hit enter.

Rudy's code probably will work for the specific platform it's designed for (Linux?), as it's basically an implementation of the Windows _getch().

Unfortunately I don't have a c/c++ compiler on my Windows machine at work.... so I can't test it but yes I believe it was written for Linux (but I figured it might work on Windows or give him an idea where to start)

  • 0

Unfortunately I don't have a c/c++ compiler on my Windows machine at work.... so I can't test it but yes I believe it was written for Linux (but I figured it might work on Windows or give him an idea where to start)

It won't, because the Windows console is completely different. Still good to have though, since he didn't specify an OS.

The Windows implementation I described earlier would look like this (in C):

void pause(void)
{
	puts("Press any key to continue...");
	FlushConsoleInputBuffer(GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE));
	_getch();
}

If you wanted it to run on both Windows and Linux, you'd just have to add some #ifdefs.

  • 0
Your argument is made ad infinitum on the web, but it simply doesn't address the OP's question. He wants the user to be able to press any key, not the enter key.
No need to be so picky. I was not trying to contradict you, just propose an alternative - since you did not mention it, did you? ;). While "Press ENTER to continue" is technically not the same as "Press any key to continue", in many cases it achieves almost the same effect while avoiding a dependency on a non-standard C++ feature. Chances are the OP hadn't thought of it and might consider it a worthy solution. Of course your reply did address his point more directly, but since you already had done so, I saw no reason to repeat what you said.

That's all. :)

  • 0

The code needs to be portable, but I can work with the all your responses.

Right, then you have to just ask for enter. There is no portable way to ask for "any" key. It simply doesn't exist. I suppose you could use #ifdefs to add the platform-specific code for the platforms you support and have tested, and then fall back to asking for just enter on all other platforms.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This article does not make sense and it’s very evident, the bug wasn’t confirmed to exist, because the application itself runs on editions of Windows which make it impossible to run Hyper-V VMs on, “Basically, Claude Desktop on Windows spins up a 1.8GB Hyper-V virtual machine if you use Claude Cowork or agent mode even once.”, suggests the bug is caused by something else otherwise it would only happen to users with the capability of running Hyper-V VMs and that’s only if Hyper-V was enabled which is by default not enabled. The true issue is that the author who reported the bug used the incorrect terminology.
    • “To prevent hallucination issues and keep the database clean, the platform uses a multi-agent verification loop to check code quality.” - This absolutely isn’t happening. ”Before the massive rise of LLMs, which tanked its traffic by about 50% over the last couple of years, Stack Overflow was the go-to website for millions of programmers seeking coding solutions.” - It still is trusted, because the community of users, blocked other users from submitting false and misleading answers generated by AI agents that can be convinced something it generated is actually incorrect even if it’s actually correct. The company itself doesn’t know what it wants to be so it keeps trying and failing to introduce AI features to the platform. This effort will also fail, already submitted one successful poison pill, look forward to generating more.
    • Faster? MBP M5 Max, I have 4k video renders running faster than Teams.
    • Completely irrelevant as long as pricing is garbage. With OneDrive I get storage for about $18 / TB for a year. With Proton it's $96. For the record, Google One is around $48, Dropbox $69, iCloud $60. In other words, Proton is the worst value BY FAR. Not to mention with OneDrive I get full desktop and web office suites for 6 people.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      211
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!