• 0

Basic Html/Css Questions..


Question

When writing lots of paragraphs what is the best way to do it:

A:

<p>Paragraph 1</p>

<p>Paragraph 2</p>

<p>Paragraph 3</p>

or B:

<p>Paragraph 1...<br />

Paragraph 2...<br />

Paragraph 3...</p>

-----------------------------------------

When creating complex-ish layouts, like the image i've attached below, what is the best way to do this in CSS. I have a feeling i'm going the long winded way about it.

Ignoring the header and footer, this is my CSS for the below image:

main width 800px

#menu {

width: 250px;

float: left;

}

#BigPhoto {

width: 550px

float: left;

}

#Middle {

width: 400px

float: left;

}

Text {

width: 650px;

float: left;

}

PhotoBottom {

width: 150px;

float: left;

}

.clear { clear: both; } /*to bring the footer down*/

Also, if each of the columns on each row varied in size i would also have to wrap those in <div></div> to keep in rows inline.

layoutmz.png

I've worked on a website that is laid out similar to this, and it has different layouts on every page.. This has made the CSS look very messy, i'm just wondering if that's the way you would go about doing those types of layouts.

Is there a way to get text and photo side by side without putting each in it's own div?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/886726-basic-htmlcss-questions/
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

a) best way ive always doen it to keep it more organized is to use <p></p> for each separate paragraph. it gets confusing embedding a whole bunch of <br />'s throughout your text

b) your css looks fine. i didnt chekc to make sure it worked, but the style of it looks fine.

  • 0

a) best way ive always doen it to keep it more organized is to use <p></p> for each separate paragraph. it gets confusing embedding a whole bunch of <br />'s throughout your text

b) your css looks fine. i didnt chekc to make sure it worked, but the style of it looks fine.

Thanks,

the real issue i was having was just the different sized boxes = lots of CSS. the messier it got the more i thought i was going the long way about it.

Paragraphs go in well, paragraph tags :p

They are both technically in paragraph tags.

--

So is it possible to have text side-by-side but contained in the same <div>

  • 0

1. Lots of paragraphs, go with:

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

2. If every block is going to have a different fixed width, then yes, every block will have to have its own rule in the CSS. However, if you have say 3 different blocks with the same width, it may make more sense to create one class that those 3 can share.

3. Once you float the photo left or right, the text will naturally move to its side. You can apply the float directly to the image without a div.

  • 0

3. Once you float the photo left or right, the text will naturally move to its side. You can apply the float directly to the image without a div.

I didn't know that, it would definitely eliminate the need for some extra divs as i have been casing each text and photo in it's own div just to get them side by side.

  • 0

As the others said, paragraph tags are designed to encase a single paragraph, so for each paragraph, you want to put it in a new <p></p> tag.

As for your question about row alignment, its actually necessary to have divs to align the rows anyway. If you're floating your items on the left, you will need extra the divs to stop the paragraphs and other stuff from sitting alongside the floated elements.

  • 0

To be technically correct,Princeton defines a paragraph as

"One of several distinct subdivisions of a text intended to separate ideas."
(emphasis mine). The more logical way to code your document is to divide paragraphs, as they should be, by their tags...

&lt;p&gt;This is the first paragraph...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the next one...&lt;/p&gt;

But if your paragraph is divided into blocks of text that are still relating to the same subject, you should use line break tags:

&lt;p&gt;This paragraph has a subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Still talking about the same subject...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And so on.&lt;/p&gt;

However, the simplest thing of all is to just split everything using <p> tags, as the other posters have suggested.:)

Hope this helped!

-- unintentional;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!