Toshiba vs. HP: Quality/Durability

By unintentional
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Contributor

unintentional

Posted
Posted

DISCLAIMER: This is my first post on the site. I tried to search for similar topics and didn't come up with anything that matches my problem, so please forgive me if someone has recently asked or if this is the wrong place for this post.

Hi everyone!

I'll be shipping off to college in the fall, and I need a good laptop for school activities and other related work. I would like a computer with a large hard drive, at least 4GB of ram, wireless b/g/n support, and a 64-bit version of Windows. I do nearly all of my shopping at Amazon.com, and I managed to narrow down the final candidates to these two computers: (scroll down to see the specifications)

HP Pavilion DV6-2162NR

Toshiba Satellite L505-GS5037

I don't really care about the difference in price. What is easily noticeable is that the hardware specs on both of these machines are nearly identical (the HP has just a slightly better processor and a higher RPM on the same size hard drive as the Toshiba). What I want to know is out of your experience, is one brand more durable than the other? I've experienced way too many problems on a crappy old Dell to go back to them. My Apple experience has been about average, but I have never dealt with any other brands. Please indicate what kinds of repairs you needed to fix or have worked on (any experiences with customer service would be nice as well:))

Thanks,

-- unintentional

(P.S. On an unrelated subject, if I got the Toshiba, does anyone know how to remove the Face Recognition component from the Windows login screen?)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/886782-toshiba-vs-hp-qualitydurability/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

M_Lyons10

Posted
Posted

I have honestly never had a good experience with an HP. It always fails... Even friends I've known that had HP had serious issues... As for Toshiba, I've never owned one, but a couple of friends have. They've never had problems. And they've had these machines for a LONG time...

Community Regular

d4diesel

Posted
Posted

In terms of quality durability, both HP and toshiba will be close. I haven't dealt with toshiba but HP warranty in Canada is a nightmare. I would rather just buy a new one rather deal with their warranty. On the other hand, have been very satisfied with Dell warranty. Bought a Inspiron when vista came out and i have flickering issues. turns out it was a driver issue but they replaced the whole laptop and upgraded some specs on the new one. for the XPS, again, had the dreaded Nvidia video card problem and they replaced the whole motherboard. The XPS casing had a crack b/c i dropped it accidently once but they replace that as well for free without even asking. the turn around time for me has been roughly 3-5 business day for the repairs.

if you are looking for well built laptop and dont mind spending a little bit more, I know that Sonystyle.ca has been selling similar i3 laptop like the one you posted for around 700 bucks. I am sure sonystyle.com would have similar deals as well. might want to check them out.

EDIT: here is the link to the sony laptop. http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&categoryId=8198552921644699998&N=4294953240

Collaborator

Howling Wind

Posted
Posted

Toshiba. I had like three HP laptops for school (because they were cheaper than a Apple laptop) and all ended up frying in a year. Video card I think. Bad cooling setup or something.

My dad has had a Toshiba since 2007 for stuff at work and it has only needed to have the HD replaced. I vote Toshiba. I would vote Dell over HP for laptops honestly >.>

Sure Dells are noisy and stuff but hey... atleast the fan works. HP isn't too noisy... but all mine fried =/ Toshiba is pretty quiet and it still doesn't fry.

Veteran

The Dark Knight

Posted
Posted

I would recommend a Toshiba any day. I have a 4 & 1/2 year old Toshiba Satellite that still works perfectly. Not had to replace any of the parts, all factory originals. Even the battery still holds a decent charge. Although it originally came with Windows XP Home, it is now running Windows 7 Ultimate.

Whereas 3 of my friends have 3 different HP laptops, all a little over 1 year old and bought seperately; running Windows 7 reports that the battery is in need of a replacement. The battery charge hardly lasts, despite being a little over 1 year old only! And that is not the only problem; software and driver support is horrible, customer service is also pathetic, etc. All of them are not at all happy with their purchases and have vowed never to buy HP again.

Now I know, and as some people here have said, that not everyone faces problems with their HP laptops, but at least from what I have seen and hear, they are not a good option.

And to the person who recommended a VAIO, Sony laptops are not at all reliable. Sony should have stuck to making what they are good at, that is; Televisions, Music Systems and portable audio players.Many people I know have had a lot of issues with them. And these are not minor software issues. Some had their Motherboards die on them, sound cards failing etc.

On an unrelated subject, if I got the Toshiba, does anyone know how to remove the Face Recognition component from the Windows login screen?

AFAIK, that should be removable from Programs & Features in the Control Panel.

Grand Master

zhangm Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

Cold hard reality: every major OEM (Dell, Sony, HP, Toshiba, Lenovo) has different product lines for consumers and businesses. The business class machines will have more consistent quality, be better supported, and last longer. The simple reason is that if the OEM screws over an individual consumer with a shoddy machine that falls apart two weeks after the default year-long warranty, they might lose a future sale or two. If the OEM screws over a corporate customer, they'll lose tens or even hundreds of thousands of sales.

If you're looking for a disposable or secondary (to a primary desktop machine), that will experience its first hardware failure within six months and require major hardware replacement after two years, then go ahead and buy a relatively cheap consumer-oriented model. If you're looking to rely on this laptop for work through three, four, or even five years of school, then look to the business-class laptops: ThinkPads, Vostros, Latitudes, and Precisions, and the Pro/Elitebooks.

Also be aware that since you're now a college student (presumably some institution has accepted you), you'll be eligible for academic discounts, either through your school's computer store, or directly via the OEM website. You should easily be able to get ~10% off, or possibly more, depending on the OEM and the final configuration that you choose. I believe my Dell laptop had an up-front 700$ discount, and I managed to top that off with an additional 16% discount. Finally, if you're intending to rely on this purchase for several years, don't skimp on the warranty. Get at least three years. Laptop components are heinously expensive to replace yourself, and over the period of a few years, a couple hundred bucks invested in a warranty will pay itself off.

  • Denis W. and kjx
  • Like 2
Community Regular

Sjokkel

Posted
Posted

If it's between those two, the HP for sure. That Toshiba feels and looks like crap. In terms of hardware, neither is better than the other in dependability. Buy a Sony if you want a really well built Windows laptop.

I'm currently running a sony vaio and my wife owned one in the past, had one in the office also. I never had more problems with a laptop then with a sony vaio. I still regret buying this one.

Grand Master

ATLien_0

Posted
Posted

My personal take. HPs are not terrible although lately they have had reports of engineering problems, just going by friends experiences with their laptops. HPs have always felt cheap to me. Toshiba on the other hand, they are decent, but customer support is beyond horrific. I have a few posts on here about that.

If you are only going with those 2 companies I would go with HP

Honestly there are only a handful of companies that I feel I can trust to make good products with good customer support

Dell

Lenovo

Sony

Apple

Contributor

unintentional

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I've actually already seen that article... what I was looking for was human experience, but thanks for the link!:)

I happen to disagree with you about the Dell thing, as I have had a HORRID experience with their Inspiron line when Vista came out (same time, apparently). Thanks for the link to the Sony; as I said before, I tend to do all my shopping at Amazon because I have a fantastic discount/shipping combo deal, but will definitely be checking this out.

I would recommend a Toshiba any day. I have a 4 & 1/2 year old Toshiba Satellite that still works perfectly. Not had to replace any of the parts, all factory originals. Even the battery still holds a decent charge. Although it originally came with Windows XP Home, it is now running Windows 7 Ultimate.

AFAIK, that should be removable from Programs & Features in the Control Panel.

That's good to hear. The problems I have dealt with on my Dell were mainly having the battery fail, and having the hard drive slowly go corrupt...

If you're looking to rely on this laptop for work through three, four, or even five years of school, then look to the business-class laptops: ThinkPads, Vostros, Latitudes, and Precisions, and the Pro/Elitebooks.

Thanks for your great advice; I am aware of student discounts. I do plan on buying an extended warantee for this computer (my goal is to have it last 4 years with little or no problems). Can you recommend a business model with similar specs to the ones I'm currently looking at?

Thanks to everyone who has posted. All your advice has been extremely valuable. Please continue to post if you have any additonal comments!:D

Thanks,

-- unintentional

Grand Master

zhangm Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
Thanks for your great advice; I am aware of student discounts. I do plan on buying an extended warantee for this computer (my goal is to have it last 4 years with little or no problems). Can you recommend a business model with similar specs to the ones I'm currently looking at?

These models probably will hover around 900 - 1100$ with a student discount applied, Windows 7 Pro, and extended warranties.

Lenovo Thinkpad T510.

Dell Latitude E5500.

HP ProBook 4520s.

Grand Master

Yorak

Posted
Posted

This is how it works:

HP are physically built very well and solid.

Toshiba are built very cheaply.

HP have average customer support.

Toshiba also have average customer support, probably not quite as good as HP.

HP are above average with durability.

Toshiba are below average with durability.

So overall HP seems to be a bit better than Toshiba. I know you only asked to compare those two but I would strongly, strongly recommend Lenovo if your budget permits it. :)

Also, welcome to Neowin, and good luck!

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Dv6000 was the HP laptops I owned. =/ The video card always crashed like two days away from it being a year old. We finally gave up after repairing it twice. $300 a year to repair a laptop? No thanks!

the 5000, 6000 and 9000 series (and I think maybe some others, just check a model on HP.com it's the first note under service/support) all have a service note, regarding the issue, of unable to activate wlan, dead screen, unable to power and so on. Meaning free repair outside warranty.

Granted personally, I like living in a country with a law that says laptops have a 5 year mandatory warranty on production faults. which covers this anyway.

Personally , I don't mind HP though, in fact they'd probably be my second choice for laptops. but My first laptop was a Toshiba, after that I had some Acer and while i like my Acer, it was no Toshiba.Toshibas' are just solidly built all the way through. they feel solid. so now I'm back on Toshiba, yeah it's more expensive than the Acers, but it's worth it.

Dells however, ranks slightly below acer again. and Asus, besides the terrible built quality, too much problems and issues with repairs.

Contributor

unintentional

Posted
  • Author
Posted
So overall HP seems to be a bit better than Toshiba. I know you only asked to compare those two but I would strongly, strongly recommend Lenovo if your budget permits it. :)

Also, welcome to Neowin, and good luck!

Thanks!;)

The more I search around, the more people recommend Lenovo to me, so I thought I would check them out. To whoever it was that recommended Sony, I did take a look, and decided that some of their features are a little out of my price range. Anyway, I checked out Lenovo, but I'm finding it really difficult to find a laptop with a Blu-ray drive on their website. I know they have them, and I'm impressed by their good word of mouth, but I can't seem to do this correctly *roll eyes*...

If someone could help point me to a laptop along these lines:

Intel i3 processor

300+GB HD

4GB DDR3 ram

Blu-ray player

Preferably between 14 and 16in screens.

Thanks everybody for all your help and opinion. I having taken your advice and will definitely be using it:D If you can help with the Lenovo website thing, then that would also be lovely.

-- unintentional

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

      Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2

      By Copernic · Posted

      Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43

      By Copernic · Posted

      Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Firefox 152.0.1

      By Copernic · Posted

      Firefox 152.0.1 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Firefox 152.0.1 fixes: Fixed frequent crashes affecting users with Intel Raptor Lake processors. (Bug 2039575) Fixed an issue on macOS where choosing a PDF option, such as "Save as PDF", from the system print dialog would send the job to your printer instead of saving a file. (Bug 2047850) Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 146.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      81
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!