• 0

[c#] pass variable between functions


Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 29/03/2010 at 05:54, Gangsta said:

Meaning access a variable in one from another function? that would be a scope trick. Use a variable declared outside...

if not, I have no idea what you're asking.

I have the variables declared outside of the functions, but I still can't access them. This is just a simple example what I am doing. What I do is click StudentBtt1 and update the variable to ten. Then with StudentBtt2 I want to show that updated variable. When I click StudentBtt2 I still get "1".

public int _var1 = 1;

    public void StudentBtt1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
     //update to ten
        _var1 = 5+5;
    }

    public void StudentBtt2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        //show the updated variable
        Literal1.Text = _var1;
    }


  • 0

you need to make the variable static, like..

static int x;   			

protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    x = x+5;
}

protected void Button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    Label1.Text = x.ToString();
}

however, the limitation with this is that is that a static variable is shared across all instances of the page and may will cause you issues if / when you have multiple users accessing the page.

a slightly better approach would be to use a session variable.. but global variables are not really 'supported' in c# and i think a best method would be to use a class

  • 0

Are you using WinForms/Desktop development, or ASP.NET?

It's quite important, as ASP.NET will require you to somehow persist your variables from one page view to the next, if that is what you need.

Your original solution would work perfectly fine for WinForms development, but not for ASP.NET, as when you view a page in ASP.NET the whole page class is instantiated, thus your variables would be instantiated as well.

Using a static instance as BGM suggested works for ASP.NET, again with the limitations he has expressed.

You could take advantage of either Session of ViewState too.

private int val;

protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) {
    if (Session["myVal"] != null)
      val = (int)Session["myVal"];
}

public void StudentBtt1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
  val = 5 + 5;
  Session["myVal"] = val;
}

public void StudentBtt2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
  Literal1.Text = val.ToString();
}

private int val;

protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) {
    if (ViewState["myVal"] != null)
      val = (int)ViewState["myVal"];
}

public void StudentBtt1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
  val = 5 + 5;
  ViewState["myVal"] = val;
}

public void StudentBtt2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
  Literal1.Text = val.ToString();
}

For this simple example, I'd recommend using ViewState.

Edited by Antaris
Reworded so I don't sound like a 'tard.
  • 0
  On 29/03/2010 at 05:46, heffer86 said:

I have two functions. How do I pass variables between the two?

    public void StudentBtt1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        _var1 = 5+5;
    }

    public void StudentBtt2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        Literal1.Text = _var1;
    }

Assuming you're using ASP.NET, you could store the variable in the ViewState. For example:

    public void StudentBtt1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        _var1 = 5+5;
        ViewState["_var1"] = _var1;
    }

    public void StudentBtt2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        _var1 = ViewState["_var1"];
        Literal1.Text = _var1;
    }

This allows you to store the contents of "_var1" inside the actual content of the page, and retrieve it on when you click the second button. Do bear in mind that there is a performance cost associated with keeping things inside the ViewState, but in this case, the cost is negligible.

If this is all confusing, then it might be worth reading up on the ASP.NET Lifecycle, since how pages work can be quite strange for those that aren't familiar.

EDIT: Decryptor beat me to it :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have the Pixel 9 Pro XL...Unless this thing is "leaps and bounds" faster than the 9, I'll pass. And by leaps and bounds, I don't mean on benchmarks. "Real world" faster. Most people don't even come close to topping out the performance of their phones. Tensor G5 is Google's most powerful chip to date, boasting a staggering 36 percent performance leap over G4.
    • MIT's stunning 'bubble wrap' device squeezes water out from thin air even in deserts by Sayan Sen Image by Matteo Roman via Pexels Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineers have built a new kind of device that can pull clean drinking water straight out of the air—no electricity needed. It’s designed for areas where water is scarce and traditional sources like rivers or lakes aren’t reliable. Right now, more than 2.2 billion people globally don’t have access to safe drinking water. In the United States alone, 46 million face water insecurity, with either no running water or water that’s not safe to drink. This new device, called an Atmospheric Water Harvesting Window (AWHW), uses a unique hydrogel panel that looks like black bubble wrap. These dome-shaped bubbles soak up water vapor from the air, especially at night when humidity is higher. During the day, sunlight makes the vapor inside evaporate. That vapor then condenses on a glass surface and drips down through a tube, turning into drinkable water. The AWHW doesn’t rely on power sources like batteries or solar panels. It’s completely passive, meaning it works on its own. The team tested a meter-sized panel in Death Valley, California, one of the driest places in North America, and got between 57.0 and 161.5 milliliters of water per day even with humidity as low as 21 percent. That’s more than what other similar passive devices have managed. “We have built a meter-scale device that we hope to deploy in resource-limited regions, where even a solar cell is not very accessible,” said Xuanhe Zhao, a professor at MIT. “It’s a test of feasibility in scaling up this water harvesting technology. Now people can build it even larger, or make it into parallel panels, to supply drinking water to people and achieve real impact.” Another cool part of the design is how they kept the water safe to drink. Usually, these kinds of hydrogels use salts like lithium chloride to absorb more vapor but that can lead to salt leaking into the water, which isn’t ideal. To solve this, MIT’s team mixed in glycerol, a compound that helps keep salt locked inside the gel. In testing, the lithium ion concentration in the harvested water stayed below 0.06 ppm (parts per million), which is way below the safe limit. The hydrogel domes also give the material more surface area, letting it collect more vapor. The outer glass panel is coated with a special polymer film that helps cool the glass, making it easier for vapor to condense. “This is just a proof-of-concept design, and there are a lot of things we can optimize,” said lead author Chang Liu, now a professor at the National University of Singapore. “For instance, we could have a multipanel design. And we’re working on a next generation of the material to further improve its intrinsic properties.” Published in Nature Water, the study says the AWHW could last at least a year and shows promise for making safe, sustainable water in places with harsh climates. The researchers believe an array of vertical panels could one day supply water to individual households, especially in remote or off-grid locations. Source: MIT News, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Clear Linux is open source, indeed, so its source code is available for anyone. They're just shutting down its support from them, they're not forbidding anyone else from taking over.
    • Linux Mint is also my favorite distro, but I fear what will happen with it if Clem were to disappear tomorrow, to be honest.
    • Yeah, I totally get your point, which is possible it could happen. I just hope there is a few people around him who are similar to where if they took over things would run pretty much the same. if not, then yeah, it could start to decline rapidly etc. but I figure something that's been around for a longer period of time with a decent backing, and probably more users than most Linux distro's (which I would 'imagine' Mint is one of the more used Linux desktop distro's by volume of people who use it), is less likely to just disappear. but like you said, nothing is guaranteed. but I do think you are probably right in that Clem is probably the core of what keeps Mint, Mint. I like how it tends to stay pretty much the same with some slight tweaks here and there (but is largely the same) instead of that crap some people go for with change for the sake of change trying to create a overly fancy interface and other unnecessary stuff etc. I also feel Mint keeps a nice balance of things out-of-the-box where it's not too bloated, nor too striped down. p.s. but I see Mint as a better Ubuntu basically. but I get your point like if it was more of a really serious choice of needing a 'safe bet' to use long term, then yeah something like official Ubuntu would be one of the better choices for sure given what you said with it being backed by an actual company which makes it a safer bet than Mint which is smaller and 'could' potentially be more fragile.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Ian_ earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      MacDaddyAz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Explorer
      cekicen went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      209
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      202
    4. 4
      Xenon
      145
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      121
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!