Recommended Posts

So, this weekend, while at BestBuy, I stopped at a demo of Samsung new 46" 3D HDTV. The only 3D movie available, the animated "Monsters VS Aliens" was playing on the new Samsung 3D Blu-Ray player.

First thing that caught my eyes : PRICE. For the same price of a 55" LED LCD, you get a 46" 3D display. It get worst if you go to a bigger 3D display. And then, $875 ($CAN) for the Blu-Ray player, 2 pair of glasses and that one 3D movie.

I let that shock pass, got a pair of glasses, turn them ON and watched. Not 5 minutes later, a form of headaches was getting to me. Lets just say that I don't have ANY problem watching 3D movie in theater. And it's NOT the same 3D, not at all. I don't know if it's a bad 3D movie, but things just barely feels like they pop out of the screen. I've seen my share of 3D in theater and the effect is much better than this. Before someone here tells me that I was not placed correctly to enjoy the demo, well, I was, as specified by Samsung.

It's a HUGE let down, I'll have to wait and see some other 3D movie to compare (when they are out....). But Monsters VS Aliens was not up to par, or the hole 3D experience is not up to par with theater 3D.

For the price, right now.... It's a ripoff.

What do you guys think?? Have you seen the demo?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/887830-the-begining-of-3d-hdtv/
Share on other sites

I have not seen the demo but I'll have to check it out next time I am at BestBuy.

The headache I am guessing is to due with the dual refresh rates (one for each eye). I am sure this will be of common complaint as this gets more widespread.

If im not mistaken the 3d demo in best buy uses shutter glasses, the movies I've seen in theaters use Polarized glasses, such as Avatar and How to Train Your Dragon. I too have tried the Samsung demo and felt a slight sick feeling but I'm sure you just have to adjust to it.

If im not mistaken the 3d demo in best buy uses shutter glasses, the movies I've seen in theaters use Polarized glasses, such as Avatar and How to Train Your Dragon. I too have tried the Samsung demo and felt a slight sick feeling but I'm sure you just have to adjust to it.

Yeah, theater use polarized VS LCD shutter glasses for home 3D.

That's the point, I don't want to adjust to a sick feeling... I'm quite fine when I go to theater. It suck to have two VERY different experience while watching a movie. Were talking about my eyes here, I don't want to wear them out too fast because of 3D.

People are having hearing problems sooner because of loud volume and headphones and in-ears phone. I don't want to suffer from any eyes sickness because of badly implemented 3D.

That's my point of view, and my .02 cent.

So, this weekend, while at BestBuy, I stopped at a demo of Samsung new 46" 3D HDTV. The only 3D movie available, the animated "Monsters VS Aliens" was playing on the new Samsung 3D Blu-Ray player.

First thing that caught my eyes : PRICE. For the same price of a 55" LED LCD, you get a 46" 3D display. It get worst if you go to a bigger 3D display. And then, $875 ($CAN) for the Blu-Ray player, 2 pair of glasses and that one 3D movie.

I let that shock pass, got a pair of glasses, turn them ON and watched. Not 5 minutes later, a form of headaches was getting to me. Lets just say that I don't have ANY problem watching 3D movie in theater. And it's NOT the same 3D, not at all. I don't know if it's a bad 3D movie, but things just barely feels like they pop out of the screen. I've seen my share of 3D in theater and the effect is much better than this. Before someone here tells me that I was not placed correctly to enjoy the demo, well, I was, as specified by Samsung.

It's a HUGE let down, I'll have to wait and see some other 3D movie to compare (when they are out....). But Monsters VS Aliens was not up to par, or the hole 3D experience is not up to par with theater 3D.

For the price, right now.... It's a ripoff.

What do you guys think?? Have you seen the demo?

it may look like a ripoff but come on you know the prices will be high when it first comes out wait a year or two or three it will drop.Not everone borughta HDTV when it first came out because of the high prices.The Same for bluray dvd players not everyone got them when they first came out.

polarized theater glassed does essentially the same as shutter glasses for TV's though.

polarized TV/computer glasses isn't a very good technology since it use an interlaced picture. LG does polarized though.

Theaters use shutters as well though. projectors can use polarized glasses the same way as theaters though.

I hope it doesn't catch on to be honest... i've always had a bit of a headache after watching something in 3d, I also don't like the idea of having to put on some special glasses every time I want to watch something.

As we are yet to get any proper terrestrial HDTV channels in the UK that broadcast for more than the odd random program 3D is not something ill have to worry about anytime soon i don't think.

it may look like a ripoff but come on you know the prices will be high when it first comes out wait a year or two or three it will drop.Not everone borughta HDTV when it first came out because of the high prices.The Same for bluray dvd players not everyone got them when they first came out.

I don't remember Blu-Ray player costing $875 with only 1 movie included. How much those 2 glasses cost, I don't know, but It's above and beyond what I would be ready to pay. And lets not forget, TWO glasses, so if you're more, you'll have to fork some more $$ for extra glasses.

Another thing, even if I know that it's new tech, and they are going to suck the money from early adopters... The price of admission is high. Right now (and I mean NOW) who would prefer to pay more for 46" 3D LED LCD instead of 55" LED LCD?

People are just getting on board with HDTV and buying new TV. With the slow economy, it did not help. IF you already own a relatively new HDTV, are you going to switch now to 3D?

So whats the big difference here? I can watch any 3D movie with the polarized glasses they give you with the movie on my regular LCD HDTV and I get a fantastic effect. Why should one buy a 3D TV?

-Spenser

What movie??

The only 3D movie I have here in Blu-Ray came with the CRAP blue/red cardboard glasses. The effect is terrible, the worst of all.

What movie??

The only 3D movie I have here in Blu-Ray came with the CRAP blue/red cardboard glasses. The effect is terrible, the worst of all.

I watched part of My Bloody Valentine 3D. One of my buddies nearly jumped out of his chair when an axe got thrown at the camera.

-Spenser

I don't remember Blu-Ray player costing $875 with only 1 movie included. How much those 2 glasses cost, I don't know, but It's above and beyond what I would be ready to pay. And lets not forget, TWO glasses, so if you're more, you'll have to fork some more $$ for extra glasses.

Another thing, even if I know that it's new tech, and they are going to suck the money from early adopters... The price of admission is high. Right now (and I mean NOW) who would prefer to pay more for 46" 3D LED LCD instead of 55" LED LCD?

People are just getting on board with HDTV and buying new TV. With the slow economy, it did not help. IF you already own a relatively new HDTV, are you going to switch now to 3D?

There are other changes with the 3D tv's though. like higher refresh and much higher light. thought that may only old true for the polarized type as I don't think the shutter type needs it.

I'm yet to be convinced that 3D is anything but a gimmick. The recent push by TV manufacturers into the domestic 3D market is a cynical marketing ploy, riding the current bandwagon in an effort to improve on flagging sales due to the economic downturn.

Don't believe the hype. Don't waste your money.

While I agree with many here that 3D is ridiculous and is just a great way to cause migraine, I?m surprised many here are not interested. A couple of my co-workers saw some display 3-D TVs at Best Buy and they told me it?s the most amazing thing they?ve ever seen! I haven?t checked it out yet, but maybe I should. I would like to see how ?amazing? it really is.

A couple of my co-workers saw some display 3-D TVs at Best Buy and they told me it?s the most amazing thing they?ve ever seen! I haven?t checked it out yet, but maybe I should. I would like to see how ?amazing? it really is.

It's NOT. Far from the effect that we have in a movie theater. And lets not forget the lack of 3D content as of NOW. One movie in Blu-Ray 3D, that's it. And maybe it was not the best movie to showcase the 3D HDTV.

I'm yet to be convinced that 3D is anything but a gimmick. The recent push by TV manufacturers into the domestic 3D market is a cynical marketing ploy, riding the current bandwagon in an effort to improve on flagging sales due to the economic downturn.

Don't believe the hype. Don't waste your money.

That's exactly what 3D is, a marketing ploy.

3D movies hurt my eyes too :( People think I am weird for saying this, but they really do. My bloody valentine 3D KILLED my eyesight for the next day or so.. it strained my eyes so bad I had to remove the glasses during the movie and watch part of it in the blurry condition.

Judging from what you said, my eyes get strained easily, although I have better than 20/20 vision. I've been told I have eyes like a hawk, (far sighted) which is probably why I can't watch 3D movies. Avatar did the same thing to me. I am failing 3D HDTV's.. as they are junk.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!