• 0

Which free server OS to use?


Question

I need to setup a basic no-frills LAMP server. The machine I'll be running it on is fairly old but was originally (about 6-8 years ago) some sort of enterprise server. I don't have the specifics ATM but it has 512MB of RAM and 4 processors (2 2-die Xeon).

What OS should I use? I was thinking of Ubuntu because of the wide-availability of how-to guides, but as I was researching I found guides claiming OpenBSD was the "paragon" of security for server OSes and that OpenSolaris/MySQL are the most "compatible" because Sun (and now Oracle) developed both.

The server will only be used for https requests coming to/from a BlackBerry application and making outgoing http requests to RIM's servers (for their PUSH APIs).

Which OS should I use?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/888126-which-free-server-os-to-use/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Honestly.. I dont realllly feel it matters too too much for a personal or small project such as this. You will find a lot of people will suggest different things

From Linux Distros like Ubuntu, CentOS to the BSDs like FreeBSD, openBSD.

I know openBSD strives on being a hardened OS, however I feel this can be accomplished with some patience on other OS or distributions as well.

i say just pick one that catches your eye.

  • 0

Use whichever linux distro you feel more comfortable with (or, to say it another way, which you've had the most experience with).

I personally use Debian on all linux servers, because it's the distro I've had the most exposure to (can't remember why I chose it in the first place). At the end of the day, if it's properly managed, any linux distro is as secure/reliable as any other.

  • 0

For my own uses, I like BSD but that's just because I'm used to it.

The software itself (Apache/lightttpd/whatever, MySQL, PHP, etc) is going to be pretty much the same regardless of which one you pick, just make sure that the distro in question is current with security fixes and whatnot.

Debian (or Ubuntu) is a pretty decent platform to work with. I've set a few up with that, pretty easy to deal with. Ubuntu has an install specifically catered to a server setup, kernel's tweaked a little differently, console only, etc etc. Tons of help out there for it. Last time I worked with it, it was pretty solid. Throw on Webmin for easymode administration.

If you want something a bit more user friendly if you're new to the Linux end, ClearOS is pretty decent too. Complete setup right out of the box. Personally, I think you're better off building from the ground up yourself though, learn how things work, but this one looks pretty good. Based on Centos, the free version of Red Hat Enterprise.

Nothing stopping you from using a Windows based server too, you can get Apache, MySQL, PHP, etc etc going as well, if that's what you're used to. (Granted, not free unless you qualify for DreamSpark, or 'alternative methods'). I've messed with the Abyss server which is actually rather good for a freebie too. Pretty fast, seemed secure, and easy to set up. (There's a better paid version if you need multiple domains and the like.)

  • 0
I need to setup a basic no-frills LAMP server
Then don't listen to all these people recommending the OS used in their "corporate setup" or that "the hosting industry has largely standardised on RHEL/CentOS so I think you'd be best using it"

There are a few people who said "stick with what you're most comfortable with" and that's the best advice you're going to get. Ubuntu will install a LAMP server as part of the initial install. And you're considering OpenBSD because some online tutorial said it's the "paragon" of security? LOL. Keep things simple for yourself, homie.

I've got Ubuntu running on a 12 year-old laptop with 512 MB of ram that's able to serve up 20-50 concurrent LAN connections to a PHP/MySQL stack without breaking a sweat.

  • 0

I need to setup a basic no-frills LAMP server. The machine I'll be running it on is fairly old but was originally (about 6-8 years ago) some sort of enterprise server. I don't have the specifics ATM but it has 512MB of RAM and 4 processors (2 2-die Xeon).

What OS should I use? I was thinking of Ubuntu because of the wide-availability of how-to guides, but as I was researching I found guides claiming OpenBSD was the "paragon" of security for server OSes and that OpenSolaris/MySQL are the most "compatible" because Sun (and now Oracle) developed both.

The server will only be used for https requests coming to/from a BlackBerry application and making outgoing http requests to RIM's servers (for their PUSH APIs).

Which OS should I use?

Personally just used Ubuntu Server. I usually have some very silly questions and the forums at Ubuntu always seem to hold an answer.

When I was working with a professional developer (15+ years experience) he used CentOS. But I always came back to Ubuntu..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      571
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!